registrationid
Registered Users (C)
I believe NIS has changed the policy to allow detailed case inquiry into a case by a immigration officer only if the receipt date is past due the current processing date. Basically the 150-180 estimated date range and the accompanying verbage asking the applicant to inquire if the case has taken longer then 180 days is totally bogus. So to delay and ward of inquiry the authorities could post a random processing date of Jan 1, 1900 (yes last century and am stretching the imagination) and have a blanket policy that states that they are answerable only for cases that have a receipt date prior toJan 1900. Shouldnt such policies be challenged? Shouldnt they be held accounatable for inquiry after 180 days. The stance adopted leaves plenty of room for inefficiency. In a land that is counted as having one of the most transparent policy system in the world, the procedures and policies reek of a dangerous mix of babudom bureacracy and hypocritical dictatorship.
The final parting shot: in the land where tax payer's rights are divine, these institutions run partly on our money and we contribute honestly and quite handsomely to the tax system despite not having an means to enjoy the tax benefits due to our lack of residence status. Seems like the system punishes one for trying to be legal, productive and contributory....need i say the opposite?
The final parting shot: in the land where tax payer's rights are divine, these institutions run partly on our money and we contribute honestly and quite handsomely to the tax system despite not having an means to enjoy the tax benefits due to our lack of residence status. Seems like the system punishes one for trying to be legal, productive and contributory....need i say the opposite?