Lawyer Mathew Oh on why we need to fight for Legislative Reform

gc_bronco

Registered Users (C)
Earlier many of us were happy that as per AILA's report, the effect of retrogression might be significantly reduced. Now lawyer Mathew Oh has come out with the some analysis as to why this exuberance might be showtlived and why we need to fight for legislative reform with respect to Employment Based Green Cards. So remember "It aint over till its over".

Here is an excerpt of his analysis from http://www.immigration-law.com/

  • The State Department's new prediction is derived from two changed circumstances. One is the slow-down of I-485 adjudications by the USCIS and the resultant decrease of the EB visa numbers demand on the part of the USCIS. The second factor is the delays in processing of the old labor certification cases in the Backlog Eliminination Centers of the DOL. It is not clear what has caused the decreased visa number demand from the USCIS EB-485 proceedings, but it may have something to do with the on-going reengineering of the USCIS processing and adjudication system. As for the Backlog Elimination Centers, they have yet to complete the ground work of data entry and 45-day letters, before they can focus on adjudication of the backlog applications. Currently, the USCIS is scheduled to complete the reengineering by the end of September 2006 and the DOL is scheduled to complete the ground work of data entries and 45-day letter processing by approximately the end of June 2006. As we reported earlier, a substantial number of these BEC cases are known to be 245(i) cases, meaning that the cases were filed in traditional regular application type of EB-3 in most cases on or before April 30, 2001. A substantial number of these cases have yet to go through the "supervised" recruitment process to complete the labor certification processing and it will take a substantial period of time before these cases will move into the USCIS I-485 processing system.
  • From the foregoing analysis, one can predict that the big winners of the new prediction may include (1) those old priority date I-485 cases pending before the USCIS including 245(i) cases which may be approved within next several months; (2) those old priority date I-140 cases pending before the USCIS which may at least move into the I-485 phase and getting the benefits of EAD, AP, and AC 21 change of employment eligibility; and (3) those old priority date backlog labor certification cases which can move into the I-140/I-485 concurrent filing phase upon approval of the delayed backlog labor certification processing with the ancillary benefits that come along with the filing of I-485 applications such as EAD, AP, and AC-21 change of employment benefits. It is anticipated that the cases under the foregoing (3) may remain very limited in numbers due to the BEC processing delays.
  • The real losers may turn out to be those with late priority dates. Once the USCIS reengineering work is completed by the end of this fiscal year and the BECs start processing backlog cases en masse around the end of this fical year, the stream of visa number demand will move into the State Department visal allocation system. The pressure to the allocation system will mount tremendously as time passes, and unless the Comprehensive Immigration Reform legislation brings a cure to the current ailing immigrant visa quota system within this year, it is likely that these late priority date cases may experience tremendous difficulties due to the stand-still or further retrogression of the visa numbers and the resultant unavailability of the ancillary benefits of EAD, AP, and AC 21 change of employment opportunities. It is anticipated that the real crisis may be witnessed beginning the end of this calendar year as by that time it is anticipated that the BECs are expected to pump out certifications of backlog cases.
  • It is thus obvious that the new prediction of the State Department can turn out to be a short-lived relief for a limited number of immigrants and a sign of foreseeable dark cloud and storm moving into the visa number system for most of the immigrants. The only answer to the clogged employment-based immigration system lies with the reform of the employment-based immigrant quota allocation system and related reform, including but not limited to (1) dependants immigration without taking out visa numbers from the employment-based quota system and (2) eligibility of I-485 applications for those who attained the labor certification approvals or I-140 petitions even during the period of visa number unavailability. For these reasons, the immigrant community should not stop its efforts to bring back (1) the legislative proposals which were reflected in the failed Section 8001 and 8002 of S. 1932 and (2) the adjustment of EB-immigrant quota substantially upward as reflected in the McCain-Kennedy bill.
 
what does his hope full prediction mean to us?

gc_bronco said:
From the foregoing analysis, one can predict that the big winners of the new prediction may include (1) those old priority date I-485 cases pending before the USCIS including 245(i) cases which may be approved within next several months;


what does it mean to us ???
does it mean PD will move ahead and move back :confused: , once the 245(i) cases are out of the back log centers ??

Or does he think that PD will move beyond 22nd April 2001

Any thoughts ????
 
brahmaputra said:
what does it mean to us ???
does it mean PD will move ahead and move back :confused: , once the 245(i) cases are out of the back log centers ??

Or does he think that PD will move beyond 22nd April 2001

Any thoughts ????

Yes. PD will move beyond APril 2001. But it will be temporary. This forward movement will be slow and it will continue till DOL starts approving heavily the 245i cases. At that point, PD will move back again to april 2001. Therefore, the real winners are those PDs after april 2001 and gets 485 approvals in between this temporary period. After this point, unless new legislation comes, the movement of PD beyond april 2001 may not possible for years.
 
245 (i) & Backlog centers are the key players.

can_card said:
Yes. PD will move beyond APril 2001. But it will be temporary. This forward movement will be slow and it will continue till DOL starts approving heavily the 245i cases. At that point, PD will move back again to april 2001. Therefore, the real winners are those PDs after april 2001 and gets 485 approvals in between this temporary period. After this point, unless new legislation comes, the movement of PD beyond april 2001 may not possible for years.

IF, IF , the 245(i) are delayed in the back log centers the movement of PD may be beyond 2002 what do u think ???
 
Jesus, the honest tax payers ended up in this endless queue, and the illegal aliens were granted amnesty and ended up getting greencards faster, without labor certification. No lawyer out there can bring a lawsuit to those who allowed this to happen ?

brahmaputra said:
IF, IF , the 245(i) are delayed in the back log centers the movement of PD may be beyond 2002 what do u think ???
 
What if?

What if USCIS messes up your application. Why I am saying that? Because USCIS messed up my application. I could realize that only when I applied my GC.

Rajesh Singh
 
already messed up.

Brij523 said:
What if USCIS messes up your application. Why I am saying that? Because USCIS messed up my application. I could realize that only when I applied my GC.

Rajesh Singh

Singh Bhai , they already messed up.
 
We have to keep fighting for legislation ...

Guys and Gals,

What Mr. Matthew Oh says makes perfect sense. Even if the dates progress beyond April 2001 and go into 2002 over the remainder of 06, it will be a shorterm relief for most of us. We need to make sure that the visa numbers are increased this year. We should keep supporting legislation that aims to change the immigration process. If we get complacent then retrogression will hound us all again by the end of this year.

regards,

saras76
 
EB1 and EB2

Not sure if this is going to be an issue for EB-3 only. Would the experts please
let us know ?

Regards
 
I dont understand one thing. Even if backlog centers starts approving 245(i) cases down the line, how will those people file adjustment of status if the PD stays retrogressed as it is now? Is'nt PD the date your labor gets approved and NOT when filed?

SO how can the dates ever move back even if 245(i) labors gets approved?
 
friendcool said:
I believe this is only an issue for EB-3.
EB-1 and EB-2 India/China should be ok from now.

Am I right?
There were lot of filing in EB-2 in 2002/2003/2004/early 2005. I know from California aamr 2002 cases are still rotting in Backlog centers. These would start coming in and would affect priority dates.

Immigration reforms is the only way which will nbenefit everyone irrespective of EB-1/2/3. But sadly these reforms take time to become law so don't expect anything in short terms of a year or so.
 
Sun07 said:
I dont understand one thing. Even if backlog centers starts approving 245(i) cases down the line, how will those people file adjustment of status if the PD stays retrogressed as it is now? Is'nt PD the date your labor gets approved and NOT when filed?

SO how can the dates ever move back even if 245(i) labors gets approved?
Dates can move back agian even if one person applies for AOS with P.D much earlier than current P.D

So watch out for some reverse swing.
 
Yes I understand but please explain to me the following:

1. If someone has a PD much earlier then today's cut-off why has that person not filed his/her I-485 yet? What was stopping him/her so far and what will change that he/she will apply now?

2. Even if 245(i) labors gets approved in. let's say, June 2006, will they not carry a PD of June 2006 and hence can not file AOS untill cut-off dates for that category reached June 2006?
 
Top