Is USA really serious about stopping illegal immigration ?

Rose101

Registered Users (C)
For the last few months, we are bombarded with news of illegal immigration. I am really wodering about the possibilities. Border control is not an easy task. It seems if they could find a solution to future illegal immigration, law makers could decide on current illegal population. And ofcourse. LEGAL immigrants are last in the line for now whoes problems can be tackled a little bit (may be) after/along with illegal issues or may suffer for ever by chaotic functioning of BCIS.

Is USA governament really/seriously will/can stop illegal immigration ?
 
American living is all about excesses. To be able to sustain this life style, there is perpetual need for workers to work in "slave" like conditions.

Whatever is people say on the outside, this country needs illegal people. Trying to legalize them is like shooting at you own feet.

Just my opinion, I may be right or wrong.
 
No

Short answer: NO

Just think, everyone is talking about immigration. Who's talking about SCANDALS and SCAMS of this administration???? Nobody is even talking about the 29% approval rating of the President. Good Diversion

More talk no action - keep the pot boiling.

Regards
GCStrat :)
 
By noticing all faces and actions of heads of power, I am just loosing the trust. What is the purpose of law when it is not cared by people (employers and administrators) or not heartfully implemented by Governament. If they could not find a solution to their illegal labor problems this long, how can they effectively solve anything else ? Considering a most developed nation, Are not they ashamed of a complete failure of their law making and implementation mechanism for immigration problems ? Nobody seems taking responsibility of this failure and still try to procastinate having a better bill or solution to their requirements.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Maybe politicians will be forced to deal with it.

The only thing I notice is that Americans are way more aware about the problem now. Obviously any country with a border, no matter how powerful, has limited resources. If politicians continue to turn the blind eye, I am wondering how long the public infrastructure can be sustained in the name of cheap labor ?

If the information below is true and that becomes a trend, then politicians may be forced to deal with it:

05/12/06:
4. VOTERS ARE GIVING OPEN-BORDERS FOLKS A LOT OF GRIEF -- Cannon story


Rep. Cannon's problems today are similar to what we are saying in many locales across the country. Voters are starting to make a real difference.

A couple of years ago, Cannon was bragging that he was the White House point man in the House for Bush's efforts for a guestworker/amnesty program.

He appeared at the National Council of La Raza to receive an award for his championing of illegal aliens and he was widely quoted in national media giving the reasons why illegal aliens are good for America.

Two years ago, Matt Throckmorton kept Cannon from getting the 60% of GOP convention votes necessary to go on the ballot in the fall. That is almost unheard of for an incumbent Congressman, but Cannon's immigration positions gave Throckmorton a good handle to turn. Cannon went on to win the primary but with only 58% of the Republican voters supporting him.

Ever since then, Cannon has been a little more careful and has voted pretty well on enforcement issues while continuing to push for amnesties and massive guestworker programs.

Political newcomer John Jacob (a wealthy land developer) mounted a strong challenge to Cannon based on his support for amnesty and not only denied Cannon his 60% but actually beat him 52-48.

That means the Republican voters of Utah's 3rd Congressional District will get a chance to cast a clear immigration vote a month from now, deciding whether Cannon or Jacob will be the Republican nominee on the November ballot.

This is a huge development, especially since the Wall Street Journal and Grover Norquist have been claiming for a couple of years that Cannon's victory in '04 was proof that our immigration-reduction message just can't win at the polls.

Jacob needs to be better still on immigration. All of you in Utah need to really press him to become a clearer champion of our issues. To send him an immigration survey, click here.

We had another victory at the polls in the last week in Nebraska.

Congressman Tom Osborne lost his primary attempt to run for governor. As a long-time hero football coach of the Nebraska Cornhuskers, with huge margins of victory in the past and with an endorsement by Sen. McCain just before the primary, Osborne had looked like a sure thing.

But he lost. And even he said that one of the main reasons for his loss was his support for in-state tuition for illegal aliens. His opponent stood firm against providing incentives for illegal aliens.

Osborne was a lackluster Member of Congress on our issues, with a B-minus. He wasn't that bad. But Nebraska voters made it clear that they prefer somebody a little more excited about protecting them from out-of-control immigration.

BTW, McCain spoke at the Utah convention before the vote on Cannon. McCain did his usual plea for a massive guestworker program (which, for him, includes citizenship for illegal aliens and future guestworkers). Cannon has been one of the most enthusiastic supporters in the House for solutions like the ones offered by McCain.

If McCain had an effect on the delegates, it was to remind them why they didn't like Cannon.

The Herndon, Virginia City Council was overturned by the voters over immigration.

The decision by the Herdon City Council to use public funds to set up a center for mostly illegal-alien day laborers created a controversy that got national attention.

But when the mayor and city council members came up for re-election, the voters through out all but one of the incumbents seeking re-election. The mayor is gone. The new mayor and five of the six council members was elected on a platform of opposing providing incentives to illegal aliens.
 
Top