Interim EAD after 90 days

trade_001

Registered Users (C)
Does anybody know 90-day starts from RD or from ND. Sometimes RD and ND are the same, so shouldn't raise such questions; sometimes ND is one month behind RD, so which one should be accounted?
 
http://www.murthy.com/UDac21qa.html


Question 1 : Is it the receipt date or the notice date that governs the counting of the 180-day period under AC21? TOP

Based upon the wording of the law and the INS interpretation of AC21, the 180 days should be counted from the date the INS receives the filing at one of its Service Centers. This is not the notice date, which reflects the several days or weeks the INS takes to issue the Receipt Notice. The 180 days are calendar days, not business days.
 
Originally posted by 6th-year
http://www.murthy.com/UDac21qa.html


Question 1 : Is it the receipt date or the notice date that governs the counting of the 180-day period under AC21? TOP

Based upon the wording of the law and the INS interpretation of AC21, the 180 days should be counted from the date the INS receives the filing at one of its Service Centers. This is not the notice date, which reflects the several days or weeks the INS takes to issue the Receipt Notice. The 180 days are calendar days, not business days.

It becomes 180 days now? I mean EAD filing. Normally after 90 days, one can go to local office to get interim EAD
 
trade_001,

it could be extention (90 days) or new filing (180 days),
doesnt matter,
according the "Murty"you should
be counted from the date the INS receives the filing at one of its Service Centers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top