- Home
- Forums
- Immigrant Visas (Green Cards)
- I-485 Issues
- I-485 Issues Common to All Services Centers
- General I-485 and Related Issues
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
INS is great !!
- Thread starter debo_nair
- Start date
patienceGC
Registered Users (C)
I am not laughing
The implications of this incident is huge. They are going to toughen immigration laws,do thorough background checks and be very selective when it comes to approval. I am not concerned with the end result cuz most people here dont have incriminating records ( I hope). But its gonna take a long time. Longer than the current times.
See why we cant laugh?
The implications of this incident is huge. They are going to toughen immigration laws,do thorough background checks and be very selective when it comes to approval. I am not concerned with the end result cuz most people here dont have incriminating records ( I hope). But its gonna take a long time. Longer than the current times.
See why we cant laugh?
A wake up call for the INS !
This certainly serves as a slap-in-the-face wake up call for the INS.
There are 2 possible ways that this can impact processing of immigrant and non-immigrant visas:
1. INS will stop wasting time and effort at approving criminals and terrorists 6 months after they are dead and have already committed their dastardly acts. Since time is of the essence, they will HAVE TO find a streamlined and LESS time-consuming ways to identify and not approve terrorists or would be terorists. It would be a much larger negative issue if they keep their current approval process at the current snail\'s pace, especially if they are trying to determine who is and who is not a terrorist applicant!
2. Given my first point, this embarrasing gaffe could potentially mean a more stringent, and longer, background check on the current applicants on file until they find a quicker and effective way of processing applications.
I know that we all wanted our GC, not today nor tomorrow, but yesterday. But, for the sake of my and my family\'s safety, I would rather that until the INS morons have a quicker and more efficient screening process in place, that they can be more stringent even if takes them a little more longer to adjudicate.
This certainly serves as a slap-in-the-face wake up call for the INS.
There are 2 possible ways that this can impact processing of immigrant and non-immigrant visas:
1. INS will stop wasting time and effort at approving criminals and terrorists 6 months after they are dead and have already committed their dastardly acts. Since time is of the essence, they will HAVE TO find a streamlined and LESS time-consuming ways to identify and not approve terrorists or would be terorists. It would be a much larger negative issue if they keep their current approval process at the current snail\'s pace, especially if they are trying to determine who is and who is not a terrorist applicant!
2. Given my first point, this embarrasing gaffe could potentially mean a more stringent, and longer, background check on the current applicants on file until they find a quicker and effective way of processing applications.
I know that we all wanted our GC, not today nor tomorrow, but yesterday. But, for the sake of my and my family\'s safety, I would rather that until the INS morons have a quicker and more efficient screening process in place, that they can be more stringent even if takes them a little more longer to adjudicate.