- Home
- Forums
- Immigrant Visas (Green Cards)
- I-485 Issues
- I-485 Issues Common to All Services Centers
- General I-485 and Related Issues
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Informative AILA article
- Thread starter GCWaitEB12005
- Start date
Call me Shrek
Registered Users (C)
I skimmed the article, and my question is: what good it does to _educated_ professionals? Seems like they are hammering on burger flippers and toilet cleaners...
...oh, yeah, corporate interests. Need to get a path for those to legalize, so that they would start paying lawyers, too. OK, anyone still has any doubts that AILA is NOT your friend?
...oh, yeah, corporate interests. Need to get a path for those to legalize, so that they would start paying lawyers, too. OK, anyone still has any doubts that AILA is NOT your friend?
140downgctogo
Registered Users (C)
AILA article and S 1932
I hadth same feeling. The push os for low skills and not for special skills.
I sent a letter to our congressman for supporting S 1932.
I got a prompt reply with definitive NO saying the economy and market do not support increasing numbers.
This is from a democrat.
So I have low expectations from S1932.
Democrats have sort of abandoned the immigrant population.
They are more concerned about illegal immigrants and providing all benefits to them, left unions to keep their vote banks intact and thats why Byrd mixed up the union thing with quotas for skilled workers. How many union jobs do skilled workers take away..?
I believe we should not bank on politicians at all since they don't care..we are not goignt o vote another 6-7 years anyway for them.
ITs the businesses and employers that we need to get into the fold to push the politicians as they pay them and can lobby much better.
Any suggestions for doing that?
At least if we can manouve rthe republicans, they can push the rsolutionsas they have majority and business friendly.
I hadth same feeling. The push os for low skills and not for special skills.
I sent a letter to our congressman for supporting S 1932.
I got a prompt reply with definitive NO saying the economy and market do not support increasing numbers.
This is from a democrat.
So I have low expectations from S1932.
Democrats have sort of abandoned the immigrant population.
They are more concerned about illegal immigrants and providing all benefits to them, left unions to keep their vote banks intact and thats why Byrd mixed up the union thing with quotas for skilled workers. How many union jobs do skilled workers take away..?
I believe we should not bank on politicians at all since they don't care..we are not goignt o vote another 6-7 years anyway for them.
ITs the businesses and employers that we need to get into the fold to push the politicians as they pay them and can lobby much better.
Any suggestions for doing that?
At least if we can manouve rthe republicans, they can push the rsolutionsas they have majority and business friendly.