Immigration Samachar - 04

garam.chadi

Registered Users (C)
One economist's dream is another's nightmare
By Robert Plummer

---------------------------------------------​

Ask economists the simple question "Is immigration good or bad for the US?" and you will soon find that their view is far from unanimous.

In terms of sheer numbers, legal immigration is currently high by historical standards. Figures from the Department of Homeland Security show that 1.1 million people became legal permanent residents of the US in 2005.

Most experts seem to agree that the US economy is bigger and faster-growing because of the influx of illegal workers.

David Card, an economist at the University of California, who says the wage gap between dropouts and high school graduates has remained constant since 1980.He concludes there is "scant" evidence that immigrants harm the opportunities of US-born workers.

Some US jobs only exist because of the availability of cheap illegal immigrant workers, who are prepared to work for wages that are below what Americans would accept.

Whatever the truth of the matter, the fact remains that Mexicans who enter the US illegally in search of a better life are simply obeying market forces - and little can be done unilaterally by Washington to stem the tide without the Mexican government's co-operation.

==============================​

In the end --- its' the Market Forces that drives everything.
Fast depopulating cities like Detriot (downtown area) --- even the illegals do not want to live there.....

The interesting thing is as one economist put in: Some JOBS only exists.....
Does that mean... like Strawberry harvesting ... it’s a laborious job ... and even if the workers are paid higher... it will NOT attract any US workers.
The seasonal nature of job and too much of physical labor involved makes it very less attractive.
What if illegal’s stopping coming for harvesting -- the production of strawberry disappear or become less.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
garam.chadi said:
In terms of sheer numbers, legal immigration is currently high by historical standards. Figures from the Department of Homeland Security show that 1.1 million people became legal permanent residents of the US in 2005.



1.1 million GC each year ... I never knew that the number is this high.
Any one has the break up ....

How come so few GC's for EB guys?
 
Includes all categories

nTan

GC break-up:

EB: 140K
FB-quota based: 226K
FB-near/dear - non quota: about 500K (covers mainly "spouses", "children", etc.)

BTW, in 2004, the actual number was LESS THAN 700K.

I think the overall "limit" is about 1 million.

Regards
GCStrat :)
 
gcstrat said:
EB: 140K
FB-quota based: 226K
FB-near/dear - non quota: about 500K (covers mainly "spouses", "children", etc.)


thanks GCstrat....

So near and dear ones are who ... that take up most GCs.

What is the make of this FB-near/dear guys --- they are not spouses and dependents of EB applicant right...

nTan
 
FB-near/dear

nTan

FB "near/dear" is usually for non-US citizens marrying US citizens.

Example: A non-US citizen with expired spouse and 2 children falls in love with a US citizen. They decide to get married. After marriage the US citizen spouse files for FB based GC for the spouse and children.

There is no set quota for such GCs.

Regards
GCStrat :)
 
gcstrat said:
nTan

FB "near/dear" is usually for non-US citizens marrying US citizens.

Example: A non-US citizen with expired spouse and 2 children falls in love with a US citizen. They decide to get married. After marriage the US citizen spouse files for FB based GC for the spouse and children.

There is no set quota for such GCs.

Regards
GCStrat :)

A good %age of FB "near/dear" males also non citizens who marry American single moms who look for a faithful husband and a caretaker for their fatherless children. In fact this is the easiest way to get GC especially if u r a male from countries like India where people are known for family values and are not willing to cheat. It is also easier if the single mom is fat lady.
 
The easiest way to GC

gcstrat said:
FB "near/dear" is usually for non-US citizens marrying US citizens.


Ahhh .. I totally forgot about these guys .. in this big immigration debate.
The easiest way to GC ..... which has no boundaries.
 
Top