Immigration Application Fees to Rise By 80 Percent

LolaLi

Active Member
Immigration Application Fees to Rise By 80 Percent

By Spencer S. Hsu and Darryl Fears
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, January 31, 2007; Page A03

The Bush administration will announce an increase today in immigration application fees of more than 80 percent, federal officials said yesterday.

The cost of applying for naturalization, for example, would rise from $330 to $595, and a required fingerprint check would go from $70 to $80.

The increases, which have been under consideration for months, would raise nearly $1 billion for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. The troubled $2 billion-a-year agency has antiquated paper systems that have fed years-long delays for applicants and fears that terrorists might slip through the cracks.

Union, civil rights and immigrant advocacy groups called the changes discriminatory, warning that they will keep lower-income and less-educated people from becoming citizens.

"What they're saying is, people trying to become Americans are not a priority," said Cecilia Muñoz, vice president of the National Council of La Raza, the Hispanic civil rights group.

Critics also said the changes would create an incentive for the agency to drag out processing, thereby extracting more fees, or to expedite cases for people who can afford premium services.

USCIS faces budget problems because of an increase in applications and because Congress funds it not with tax money but with user fees, which trail operational demands.

The money will allow USCIS to recoup its business costs, "provide future services, enhance national security and to modernize . . . a totally outdated business infrastructure," said an agency official who spoke on the condition of anonymity so as not to upstage the announcement.

Officials said the increases will not address costs that would result from an overhaul of the nation's immigration laws, which the White House has proposed.

Fee increases will take effect no sooner than 120 days after they are published in the Federal Register tomorrow, including a 60-day public comment period.
 
Good deal, as the proposed fee for the TDs is ridiculous. Below is the chart with the new fees - and attached is the federal registry.

TABLE 12.—CURRENT AND PROPOSED FEES
Form No. Current fee (dollars) Proposed fee (dollars) Difference (dollars)
I-90 ..................................................................... 190 290 100
I–102 ................................................................... 160 320 160
I–129 ................................................................... 190 320 130
I–129F .................................................................. 170 455 285
I–130 .................................................................... 190 355 165
I–131 .................................................................... 170 305 135
I–140 .................................................................... 195 475 280
Waiver Applications .................................................. 265 545 280
I–290B/Motions ....................................................... 385 585 200
I–360 .................................................................... 190 375 185
I–485 .................................................................... 325 905 580
I–526 .................................................................... 480 1,435 955
I–539 .................................................................... 200 300 100
I–600/600A ............................................................ 545 670 125
I–687 .................................................................... 255 710 455
I–690 ...................................................................... 95 185 90
I–694 .................................................................... 110 545 435
I–695 ...................................................................... 65 130 65
I–698 .................................................................. 180 1,370 1,190
I–751 ..................................................................... 205 465 260
I–765 ..................................................................... 180 340 160
I–817 ..................................................................... 200 440 240
I–824 ..................................................................... 200 340 140
I–829 ..................................................................... 475 2,850 2,375
I–914 ....................................................................... 270 0 (270 )
N–300 ...................................................................... 120 235 115
N–336 ...................................................................... 265 605 340
N–400 ...................................................................... 330 595 265
N–470 ...................................................................... 155 305 150
N–565 ...................................................................... 220 380 160
N–600/600K .............................................................. 255 460 205
Weighted Average Application/Petition ........................... 231 454 223
 
This is too much of a decent forum for me to say what I think about these people.
And we're still waiting for GC that take forever.
 
Hey folks,

I urge you (pretty please - with sugar on top! :D ) to post your comments regarding the registry. If we flood them with what we think about these ridiculous fee increases, then perhaps they will notice.

I personally don't understand why USCIS is not publicly funded. It angers me to think my tax dollars pay for US Citizen Passport applications and production - yet it doesn't pay for my own naturalization appication process! Incredible. Unbelievable.

The Democrats have issued a warning that they will review the proposed fee increases before allowing it to take place. They want the cost-analysis behind the reasoning...or so they say. Perhaps Congress will allocate $1billion to USCIS - which should stop the increase.

In either case - please send in your comments. The directions are on the registry document I attached.
 
Please No!

LoaLi - I know you mean well but let's not rock the boat!

We should be very happy and content with being allowed to stay in the country, working our asses off, paying taxes and getting treated like dirt. As some learned members of the Forum have previously said, the INS has started to improve and we should be content with their public relations spin that they will improve customer service even if there is no commensurate action.

So RTDs and RPs will now cost $305 a pop? I say we should beg that it should be increased to $500 and be valid for only six months. Hell, even if increased to $1,000, we will take it like real men! We should be happy that asylees are even allowed to travel in the first place.

Cheerio


LolaLi said:
Hey folks,

I urge you (pretty please - with sugar on top! :D ) to post your comments regarding the registry. If we flood them with what we think about these ridiculous fee increases, then perhaps they will notice.

I personally don't understand why USCIS is not publicly funded. It angers me to think my tax dollars pay for US Citizen Passport applications and production - yet it doesn't pay for my own naturalization appication process! Incredible. Unbelievable.

The Democrats have issued a warning that they will review the proposed fee increases before allowing it to take place. They want the cost-analysis behind the reasoning...or so they say. Perhaps Congress will allocate $1billion to USCIS - which should stop the increase.

In either case - please send in your comments. The directions are on the registry document I attached.
 
TortFeasor said:
LoaLi - I know you mean well but let's not rock the boat!

We should be very happy and content with being allowed to stay in the country, working our asses off, paying taxes and getting treated like dirt. As some learned members of the Forum have previously said, the INS has started to improve and we should be content with their public relations spin that they will improve customer service even if there is no commensurate action.

So RTDs and RPs will now cost $305 a pop? I say we should beg that it should be increased to $500 and be valid for only six months. Hell, even if increased to $1,000, we will take it like real men! We should be happy that asylees are even allowed to travel in the first place.

Cheerio

That's right! My friend TortFeasor is being sarcastic, but I am actually dead serious. After all, most immigrants gladly pay immigration lawyers $$$$$ to get their immigration issues resolved quickly and professionally, then why not pay USCIS more to get them do the same? I will be happy to pay for my citizenship application $1000 or $2000 if they say they will process my application much faster that way. This is just the cost of your ticket to Europe ( and we all travel quite often according to this site), so you can do it. I welcome your screaming responses..:}
 
I totally agreed with Lolali, we pay taxes just like US citizens, and the federal should fund at least part of immigration service. And I disagree that USCIS will improve their service quality and speed after the fee hike, not a chance.

If you don't want to read the whole document, here are ways to voice your opinion:

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by DHS Docket No. USCIS–2006–0044 by one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
You just need to select USCIS, last one on the list, and hit search, the document will show up.

• E-mail: OSComments@dhs.gov.Include the docket number in the subject line of the message.
• Facsimile: Federal eRulemaking portal at 866–466–5370.
• Mail: Director, Regulatory Management Division, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, 111 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., 3rd Floor,
Washington, DC 20529. To ensure proper handling, please reference DHS Docket No. USCIS–2006–0044 on your correspondence. This mailing address may also be used for paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TortFeasor said:
LoaLi - I know you mean well but let's not rock the boat!

We should be very happy and content with being allowed to stay in the country, working our asses off, paying taxes and getting treated like dirt. As some learned members of the Forum have previously said, the INS has started to improve and we should be content with their public relations spin that they will improve customer service even if there is no commensurate action.

So RTDs and RPs will now cost $305 a pop? I say we should beg that it should be increased to $500 and be valid for only six months. Hell, even if increased to $1,000, we will take it like real men! We should be happy that asylees are even allowed to travel in the first place.

Cheerio

TortFeasor -
I so enjoy your sense of humor - no matter how warped! May I ask who these 'learned' members are? I'm a bit shocked I'm not included in that bunch. :eek:

Shifting through your cynicism, one can pick out many 'truths'. Most notably the fact that this is a PR spin and CIS will most likely continue to be inept. We should also be content with paying taxes and living here; I believe most people in this forum fall in this category.

However, we should never be complacent about unfair rules or injustice. After all, isn't this why we fled/left our countries of birth? Personally, I'm a model citizen who pays his taxes, works hard, and enjoys life with equal gusto. I'm also a PR of this country and as such should start exercising my rights. And you better believe this will not stop after I become a citizen. It is our right to question what we view as being unfair. It is also our right to scrutinize new information until we are given enough data to validate what has been presented. What is being proposed for some of the form types justifies the fee increase; however, not all fees should be increased. There should also be a method of accountability so that CIS can be held accountable should they not accomplish what they promised. For example, a trial period or time limit to accomplish what they promise - and if they fail, applicants get refunded a portion of their fees. Or, have the agency take a loan, implement the changes they claim the increased fees will help them attain and then pass the debt on to the applicants (through increased fees). This way, applicants will not complain about the huge fees because a workable system is already in place and the distrust of CIS will be disbanded.

I could go on forever about this, as you can see. But the point here is to have a voice and speak out. There isn’t room for anger, fear or complacency.

Regards -
 
14ksusha said:
That's right! My friend TortFeasor is being sarcastic, but I am actually dead serious. After all, most immigrants gladly pay immigration lawyers $$$$$ to get their immigration issues resolved quickly and professionally, then why not pay USCIS more to get them do the same? I will be happy to pay for my citizenship application $1000 or $2000 if they say they will process my application much faster that way. This is just the cost of your ticket to Europe ( and we all travel quite often according to this site), so you can do it. I welcome your screaming responses..:}

No screaming response - sorry to disappoint. :D I am with you on this as long as one condition is met... There must be accountability on USCIS's part, so there is a guarantee the increase in fees results in a smoother and faster processing of applications.

By the way, you'd be surprised how many folks do not use lawyers. So, the idea of spending $1000 - $2000 for legal related fees is quite foreign to me.

Later -
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do not get me in trouble with you know who!

LolaLi - I will not name the names of those learned members who think the INS is improving or are outright apologists for Herculean incompetence. Apparently, there are some who suffer from the "Stockholm Syndrome" and prefer to be kind to their tormentors! Trust me you are not one of them and I love your kick ass attitude!

Unfortunately, I do not believe that any of the promises made by the INS to improve service or offer better service by raising fees will hold true. In my "brief" encounter, I have seen the cost of RTDs go from $65 to the now proposed $305 (this is a more than 469% increase in less than 7 years). Such inflation has not even been witnessed by some of the Banana republics we hail from!! GC applications have gone from $285 to the now proposed $905 (a more than 300% jump). I do not have any more patience to await their reform.

This is what I will do. When I travel, I will use my NP. It is valid for five years, costs about $100, and gets me in and out of POEs in five minutes with my GC. No hassle, no secondary inspections, no funny looks by ignoramus agents. I do not care if they raise the price of RTDs to $305, $500, $1,000 or $1,500 (not an unlikely scenario, in light of the 469% increase).

Of course, I know how to kick the INS’ ass if they even have the temerity to challenge my use of NP at naturalization time. At that time, I will pay whatever the prevailing cost is charged to naturalize. To be cynical and from a selfish point of view (here I agree with 14ksusha) the increase may hurt a lot of people but for those of us who are well established and earn six and seven digit figures, the fees are pocket changes. Hey, come to think of it - look at the bright side - it may even reduce the number of people in the pipeline. Those who can not immediately afford to seek that dream will delay their applications. Less people means more expedited approval. Sweet!

Where can I sign up to demand that the INS further revises its schedule of fees to increase fees further?

Cheerio


LolaLi said:
No screaming response - sorry to disappoint. :D I am with you on this as long as one condition is met... There must be accountability on USCIS's part, so there is a guarantee the increase in fees results in a smoother and faster processing of applications.

By the way, you'd be surprised how many folks do not use lawyers. So, the idea of spending $1000 - $2000 for legal related fees is quite foreign to me.

Later -
 
Top