I think our understaing about finding FP using A# & WAC# is wrong.

raju muthu

Registered Users (C)
I spoke with IIO first time and she could see the FP result using WAC# and second time called IIO I told my WAC# before she asked. But she said A# will be better. Then I asked her can\'t she see using WAC# then she said even if you give WAC#, they will access the FP using A#.
So some IIO will find the A# using WAC# and some IIO prefer to get A# from us (may be lazy IIO or don\'t know how to find A# in the system).
That is why some people in the board say, first time IIO could see FP using WAC# but second time they could\'t and asking for A#.
Hope guys understand what I meant to say.
Still if you believe in System 1 and System 2 concept go ahead no problem.
 
Two systems theory still holds

A# number can be found from your files if an IIO wants to. Usaually, they will ask you for A# number to save a few key strokes. If an IIO askes for your A#, then it is more or less certain that your FP did not move to the local system, where as, if they don\'t ask for A# then your can be on either system. There is no sure-fire check to confirm if your FP made it to the local system.
-Raju
 
No Title

i really do not understand why there should be two systems, if any???
they should just have a central system.
 
Top