again, it\'s a personal opinion and I\'m no legal expert, BUT:
From the former posts, you can see that several people have successfully gone through this kind of situation.
Now to your comments about my former post:
By saying nothing, a person does not lie! An attorney is bound to protect the interests of the person he/she is representing, within the limits of the law. Actually, if my understanding of legal counseling services is correct, the attorney puts himself/herself in a rather unethical position
by doing the opposite.
The 180 day threshold you are mentioning allows one to use the provision in question, I give you that, but it says "if the case is not adjudicated in 180 days" and does not mention anything about when a job change can occur (see the link to a Murthy transcript posted in this thread). Furthermore, since the poor dude made sure that his I140 would not be revoked as a request of his former employer, to me it seems that he could be OK, provided that he meets the AC21 criteria (similar job, > 180 days and so).
The purpose of this forum, the way I see it, is, among others, to give people ideas that would help them find a way out of their immigration trouble, rather than to tell them they\'re doomed, because it makes one feel smart or something. "Refraining from giving tips" (to follow the law, not to break it, though), would definitely not help anybody.
my 1 1/2 cents,
v.v.
PS: the spelling is "egregious"!