goofy3 said:My I-140/495 was denied a two week back, I work for a big company with around 200+ employees, 25 mil turnover. In RFE they wanted the financial statement of the company which was given but it was still denied from the california center although people who had applied from other centers like vermont got the GC, even from california many people were approved 2 months back. I am going to apply for MTR soon.
what is LDU ?
thanks
goofy3 said:I am in EB3. Do you know of any case here with the same situation. The reason I have doubt is you get 7th year extension based on GC, if that is denied then there is no valid reason, if it was within 6 years period it might be possibe.
goofy3 said:How long does it takes to get the result from MTR?
Are you currently being paid more than the LC wage? Have you been paid 55-60K all the time since 2001 or only sometimes? BTW, you can continue working on your H-1B.goofy3 said:I am going to file for MTR ia a week.
My current H1 is till jan 06. I hope in that case I can still use my current
H1, i dont have to apply for new h1.
My LC salary is 45k, I earn around 55k- 60k. PD - 2001.
How long does it takes to get the result from MTR?
goofy3 said:Yeah I have always been paid more than 45k . I got approved labor in 2004.
the PD was on 2001. The uscis says my employer didnt had money in 2001(ie they didnt pay much taxes) to sponsor 10 GC so it is denied, they have approved 5 of them.
You should win the case if you can prove you have been paid more than LC PW all the time. Be sure to attach all your W-2s and all this year's pay stubs. I cannot image how the CIS kick you out if they have the proof in their hands. Of course, if you cannot provide the proof or do something beyond people thought such as pay the employer and then the employer pay back, that will be another thing.goofy3 said:Yeah I have always been paid more than 45k . I got approved labor in 2004.
the PD was on 2001. The uscis says my employer didnt had money in 2001(ie they didnt pay much taxes) to sponsor 10 GC so it is denied, they have approved 5 of them.
This is good to know that i can work till my H1 lasts.
goofy3 said:It was a subsitute labor, There profit for 2001 was very less and they sponsored too many people then what they were supposed to.