how long do you really have to stay with current employer????

bb_5555

Registered Users (C)
ok I am really confused

how long do you absolutely have to stay with employer after getting gc

lets say for sake of arguement that employer sponsored you and you got your gc today

also lets say employer doesn't really care if you leave tomorrow

where did this 6 month rule come from?
 
bb_5555 said:
where did this 6 month rule come from?

Nowhere, There is no CIS regulation to support that rule. And there is no known case to conclude anything like that. So don't beleive it just because it been mentioned again and again on this forum. :D :D
 
Well,

Here is the deal. An employment based green card is issued in the basis of a future employment with that employer. It is absolutely possible to work for one employer (or be a student) and process GC with another employer (As long as that employer is willing to do that. Normally they don't).

Now since you obtained the GC in a future employment basis and If you don't stay with the sponsoring employer, then USCIS may determine that you obtained the GC by means of fraud (Only if you get caught). You may not be get caught until after it is time for your Naturalization. At that point you may not get approval for Naturalization.

If you have no intention to Naturalize you are usually fine unless you get caught by other means.

Go ahead change employment man. Let yours be the first case to prove that changing employoment before 6 months is a problem. :p
 
I do want to see how far I can go with this

actually I am a citizen and I want to create a business that sponsors immigrants solely for the purpose of them getting their gc

once they got their gc I would want them to leave so I can bring on another one. maybe I can make it look like they were laid off or something
 
bb_5555 said:
I do want to see how far I can go with this

actually I am a citizen and I want to create a business that sponsors immigrants solely for the purpose of them getting their gc

once they got their gc I would want them to leave so I can bring on another one. maybe I can make it look like they were laid off or something

Are you serious or just dumb and stupid?
 
what?

what's wrong with that?

there is nothing illegal about it

I am the employer and I have the discretion.

In fact it makes good business sense to do this

who better to help sell my product then someone who knows the language, the culture.

immigrants have a lot to offer to a business that a native born person just doesn't have.

yes I am considering doing this

and I hope some of you are willing to help me do it
 
bb_5555 said:
I do want to see how far I can go with this

actually I am a citizen and I want to create a business that sponsors immigrants solely for the purpose of them getting their gc

once they got their gc I would want them to leave so I can bring on another one. maybe I can make it look like they were laid off or something

This would be tantamount to fraud. You need a valid job opportunity to sponsor a GC, you can't create a job solely for the purpose of GC. Also this type of posting could invite retaliatory action in the form of a lawsuit by some concerned individual. So these types of posts are not recommended here :mad: :mad: :mad:
 
hipka said:
This would be tantamount to fraud. You need a valid job opportunity to sponsor a GC, you can't create a job solely for the purpose of GC. Also this type of posting could invite retaliatory action in the form of a lawsuit by some concerned individual. So these types of posts are not recommended here :mad: :mad: :mad:
Hold on now, how about some freedom of speech? He did not call people names, there was no vulgar language. Who are you to decide what is "recommended" or "advisable"? People post all sort of idiotic questions all the time. With this guy, you just explained to him that it is illegal to have a business like that. It is up to him to go forward and end up in jail, potentially. It is no concern of yours, is it?
 
GeneM said:
Hold on now, how about some freedom of speech? He did not call people names, there was no vulgar language. Who are you to decide what is "recommended" or "advisable"? People post all sort of idiotic questions all the time. With this guy, you just explained to him that it is illegal to have a business like that. It is up to him to go forward and end up in jail, potentially. It is no concern of yours, is it?

Technically speaking, what he is saying is very much possible. There is no law that explicitly declares this unlawful. My advice to bb_5555 is talk to a lawyer and good luck. Hope to see you in the news sometime.
 
GeneM said:
Hold on now, how about some freedom of speech? He did not call people names, there was no vulgar language. Who are you to decide what is "recommended" or "advisable"? People post all sort of idiotic questions all the time. With this guy, you just explained to him that it is illegal to have a business like that. It is up to him to go forward and end up in jail, potentially. It is no concern of yours, is it?
Alas!An neo-Hercules kind of person needed to shoulder or support those type
of utopian business propositions.
Is there one? If so,he can only help this type of revolutionary(?) business idea which may boomrang nicely.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Participant said:
Alas!An neo-Herclues kind of person needed to shoulder or support those type
of utopian business propositions.
Is there one? If so,he can only help this type of revolutionary(?) business idea which may boomrang nicely.
Agreed, but who the heck cares about this business proposition? I do not care. All I care is the self righteousness about what is advisable to post and what is not.
 
GeneM said:
Agreed, but who the heck cares about this business proposition? I do not care. All I care is the self righteousness about what is advisable to post and what is not.
Who told you that you are free to post any junk you wish to? There have been several cases of employers suing employees for complaining about them. In this case this guy is asking advice about something illegal, so it should not be posted. Don't give me that nonsense about freedom of speech. I know exactly how free you are in this country.
 
hipka said:
Who told you that you are free to post any junk you wish to? There have been several cases of employers suing employees for complaining about them. In this case this guy is asking advice about something illegal, so it should not be posted. Don't give me that nonsense about freedom of speech. I know exactly how free you are in this country.
Who told you that you are the gate keeper of the posts? Only the host of this board can potentially be liable for illegal discussions. If you are the host, I profoundly apologize, otherwise you have no right to determine what is supposed to be posted.

And, by the way, you have no idea how free I am in this country.
 
GeneM said:
Who told you that you are the gate keeper of the posts? Only the host of this board can potentially be liable for illegal discussions. If you are the host, I profoundly apologize, otherwise you have no right to determine what is supposed to be posted.

And, by the way, you have no idea how free I am in this country.

I am no gate keeper, just an advisor. Contributors are also liable for illegal advice and although you may think you know about freedom of speech I know better!
 
Basically,I beleive,the host of this site was generous in providing a common
arena for the people with immigartion issues or issues related to immigrants,to post or suggest to get an co-operative hand in the process of alleviation
of the problems/impending problems and re-instill hope in the strenous saga of getting their immigration benefits /realted issues whether minor or major.
Across the years it really helped the immigration stressedup people got an
releif and helping hand from the other members and relieved the despair
in many cases and still doing.
This reflects in the real and genuine issues faced by mebers posted and got suggestions for themselves and retained as archives helps future issues of members/new members issues.
Hence the term to be considered here is 'affective contribution' in either the (real)issues faced or solutions or general topics (for a change for small time!).
I guess,the host(for that matter any host who provides) might have thought
this resposibility was pregone understanding for the learned members for
using this benefit(only my guess,correct me if I am wrong) and hence might have not thought to put the 'strings' and spared whcih involves his valuable 'data base space' also.
Inaddition,any right to post any also has an repsonsibility equally and automatically implies and need not be expilicit.
So it is upto memebers to use the descrition how it will contribute to him
or to the community or just posting for the heck of it.
So the questions remains for one's own.none else and not needed to be judged by others absolutely .Agreed.
Further it remains.
Is it real? or Is it genuine? or is it legal ?or is it inline ?or is it worth atall?
or is it incremental to the positive sense? at least any one of these?
Adding to the daily life of the immigrant?
or simply detrimental?One has think himself then.
 
qwertyisback said:
How many drinks you had before posting such many use(less) post??? :D :D

Too many I guess as I have wasted my time reading all the BS thats posted here. A guy put forward a business idea. Who the &*$% cares if it is illegal or not?! Its his %$#@&%$ problem! Ok, I feel better now.
 
Top