- Home
- Forums
- Immigrant Visas (Green Cards)
- I-485 Issues
- I-485 Issues Common to All Services Centers
- General I-485 and Related Issues
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
how accurate is rupnet gc predictor?
- Thread starter lindaMac
- Start date
For me the best way to treat Rupnet's prediction is how you treat your horoscope.You know it is not totally accurate, but it serves as a guide and have fun with it.I should have been approved last March 03 following 4 months ago.If you decide to check on their last month or worst this month's prediction, I would get my approval April 04.
Console yourself by clicking the one that shows earlier chances of your approval rather than having it delay, otherwise you will just get frustrated with the current or what is going on.Enjoy!
Console yourself by clicking the one that shows earlier chances of your approval rather than having it delay, otherwise you will just get frustrated with the current or what is going on.Enjoy!
LindaMac,
I guess, as a mathematical predictive tool, such models can be nearly accurate...perhaps 90% plus, till the kinks are ironed out, when they reach 99% plus accuracy, especially if the model can learn from mistakes.
The problem with what this model is trying to do is simply this: it assumes that there is a rhyme, reason, method in the madness... and therein lies its downfall. Mathematically, such models do not deal well with 'catasthrophes'... and the BCIS is surely that, in every sense of the word!
I guess, as a mathematical predictive tool, such models can be nearly accurate...perhaps 90% plus, till the kinks are ironed out, when they reach 99% plus accuracy, especially if the model can learn from mistakes.
The problem with what this model is trying to do is simply this: it assumes that there is a rhyme, reason, method in the madness... and therein lies its downfall. Mathematically, such models do not deal well with 'catasthrophes'... and the BCIS is surely that, in every sense of the word!