tyrannosaur
New Member
I'm a Canadian working for a mid-size commercial production company in Los Angeles, California. I have a bachelor's degree in Mass Communications from a Canadian university.
We applied for an H-1B under the occupation of "Communications Specialist", which I think the lawyer connected with "Public Relations Specialist", and recently received an Request For Evidence (RFE), obviously relating to the definition of a "specialty occupation".
I've done some research, in particular into appeals cases, and heard the consistent mantra that "it is not enough to go on the record without supporting evidence." I'm concerned that my lawyer won't acknowledge this, or is unwilling to be as thorough as possible.
My question is (especially for anyone with experience with RFEs) -- how can I compile the most compelling case when I submit my response? I understand at the base level we should provide
Is there anything else we can/should submit to bolster my case?
ALSO: my lawyer thinks it will be enough to simply have similar companies submit letters, but I'm worried this will be written off by USCIS as "going on the record without evidence" -- do I need a company brochure, and maybe copies of the diplomas, etc. of the employees they claim to have hired? Or at the very least, do they need to specifically name the people? I am very worried about this.
And for job listings, I saw all the appeal cases thrown out because their wasn't sufficient evidence that the companies were in the same industry, or of a similar size. What can I submit alongside the postings that can corroborate this? Print outs from the company website? Press/corporate kits?
Thanks so much for your help and wisdom, guys!
We applied for an H-1B under the occupation of "Communications Specialist", which I think the lawyer connected with "Public Relations Specialist", and recently received an Request For Evidence (RFE), obviously relating to the definition of a "specialty occupation".
I've done some research, in particular into appeals cases, and heard the consistent mantra that "it is not enough to go on the record without supporting evidence." I'm concerned that my lawyer won't acknowledge this, or is unwilling to be as thorough as possible.
My question is (especially for anyone with experience with RFEs) -- how can I compile the most compelling case when I submit my response? I understand at the base level we should provide
- an enhanced job description (any opinions on what this might require? Our original application already included time breakdowns/percentages)
- degrees and pay stubs of any employees in the same position, past or present
- letters from similar sized companies in the same industry, acknowledging that they require employees to have my same degree when doing the same position.
- job postings from similar sized companies in similar industries, specifically requiring people with my degree for similar positions.
Is there anything else we can/should submit to bolster my case?
ALSO: my lawyer thinks it will be enough to simply have similar companies submit letters, but I'm worried this will be written off by USCIS as "going on the record without evidence" -- do I need a company brochure, and maybe copies of the diplomas, etc. of the employees they claim to have hired? Or at the very least, do they need to specifically name the people? I am very worried about this.
And for job listings, I saw all the appeal cases thrown out because their wasn't sufficient evidence that the companies were in the same industry, or of a similar size. What can I submit alongside the postings that can corroborate this? Print outs from the company website? Press/corporate kits?
Thanks so much for your help and wisdom, guys!