Have you got USCIS (Yates?) e-mail ?

GCdreamer2006

Registered Users (C)
I searched USCIS.gov but I couldn't find an e-mail I could use for feedback/reuqests. Please let me know if you have e-mails I could use to send the following suggestion to help relief problems caused by this tragic backlog. I am not sure if Yates is still in charge.

Let's face it, this backlog will stay with us for a long time. Perhaps the US Congress *may* increase Visa numbers, but no miracles are expected.

In my view, one of the key frustrations and main drawbacks of this long greencard process is the career stagnation condition. Honestly, one can get your entire career ruined if there is no possibility to change jobs and move up in the career ladder after 4 years. Now imagine if you don't grow for 7-10 years due to this backlog. I am not sure if my staying in the US could be justified under such circumstance. This is serious especially in IT. The existing AC21 portability has a serious restriction that allow you only to change to same or similar jobs. This adds a level of uncertainty in this process and many are not willing to take the chance. Moreover, after 4 or 7 years working in the same occupation, naturally many have the ambition to move up and take positions such as a program manager, product manager, director, etc. The AC21 portability would be useless in this case. You also need to ask the new employer to provide letter to USCIS which states the offer is "permanent". The language in such AC21 letter intimidates many new employers, especially the ones without a legal department to interpret such letter. If such letter is not required from the part of the new employer, all you could say to new potential employer is "I AM AUTHORIZED TO WORK IN THE US". From there you could use your EAD and have a transparent job transition. When you mentioned such need for AC21 letter, it is when you end up explaining that you need such AC21 letter in order to accept the position with new employer, you need to explain you are temporarily here waiting for I-485, etc. In reality, many (if not most) employers walk away from offering you the job.

My request to USCIS is that in order to help alleviate this backlog problem, please change requirements on AC21 to "If I-140 has been filed and I-485 > 180 days, YOU CAN CHANGE JOBS. Period."
Then EMPLOYEE/BENEFIACIARY should send copy of paystubs of new job to USCIS to demonstrate he/she is employed. That is it.
 
I completely agree with you....I dont care if I get a green card after 20 years. ......as long as they let me change jobs without ANY restrictions...I am totally fine with everything....
 
Let's face it, apparently this simple rule could be relatively easy to get implemented, since it doesn't rely on complex US Congress votes. If USCIS so desires, USCIS could even establish this based on priority dates, to make sure that the individual can satisfy reasonable requirements of sponsorship based on the specific employment Labor Certification was filed for. Something like, if I-140 is approved ,I-485>180 days AND Priority Date > 4 years, let individual change jobs.


santosh_30 said:
I completely agree with you....I dont care if I get a green card after 20 years. ......as long as they let me change jobs without ANY restrictions...I am totally fine with everything....
 
You would be asking wrong people.

Its true there should be complete portablility after 180 days. In my opinion this whole GC process should not be there. Instead there should be a process like point based system they have in Canada,Australia. Atleast they can pilot that with people who have US degrees and atleast 4-5 yrs US work experience and give them GCs without the whole idiotic process.
But providing this feedback to USBCIS will not serve any purpose. These people are just following what is written in law.They are just there to interpret and implement the law not to write it.
It is US Congress who should be educated. And yes good luck with that.
 
Kutta Billi.. getting nicer.. kya hua ?

AlHindi said:
Its true there should be complete portablility after 180 days. In my opinion this whole GC process should not be there. Instead there should be a process like point based system they have in Canada,Australia. Atleast they can pilot that with people who have US degrees and atleast 4-5 yrs US work experience and give them GCs without the whole idiotic process.
But providing this feedback to USBCIS will not serve any purpose. These people are just following what is written in law.They are just there to interpret and implement the law not to write it.
It is US Congress who should be educated. And yes good luck with that.
 
I think sending this to a higher up at USCIS would just be a small step. I already called a couple of US Congressmen office and suggested this. At least it is reasonable, I think. Of course if will be implemented or not it is another story, but it is time for action now, not evaluate what is going to pass or not.

AlHindi said:
Its true there should be complete portablility after 180 days. In my opinion this whole GC process should not be there. Instead there should be a process like point based system they have in Canada,Australia. Atleast they can pilot that with people who have US degrees and atleast 4-5 yrs US work experience and give them GCs without the whole idiotic process.
But providing this feedback to USBCIS will not serve any purpose. These people are just following what is written in law.They are just there to interpret and implement the law not to write it.
It is US Congress who should be educated. And yes good luck with that.
 
Top