good for consular processing!

Ali_Sabri

Registered Users (C)
should support also if consular processing!????

please answer my question

I know part of this new law is only beneficial for people who are already in USA as they can file i-485 even their file is not current,but my question is that
Is this law also useful for people outside USA as priority dates may go forward because 90 000 extra visas and priority dates become better or not?

thanks for your helps
 
Last edited by a moderator:
two reason?

1-Exemption of All Dependents from the Visa Count
2-Recapture Up to 90,000 Unused Visa Numbers Each Year

do u agree with me?
also usefull for consular processing
 
yeah i think the CP guys will benefit too because as you said the PD's will move forward. But i dont think the PD's will become current for either india or china so those folks may be stuck till their PD's becomes current.


Ali_Sabri said:
1-Exemption of All Dependents from the Visa Count
2-Recapture Up to 90,000 Unused Visa Numbers Each Year

do u agree with me?
also usefull for consular processing
 
well, not really.

If you are within the USA, there is the possibility of getting an EAD (even though PD is not current). But in case of CP, you are stuck outside the USA. The case will be processed only after the PD's are current.

So in a way, if this becomes the law, non-Cp chaps have an advantage

my 2 cents....
 
From immigration-law.com
----------------------------

11/06/2005: S. 1932 and Consular Immigrant Visa Proceeding vs. I-485 Application Proceeding

People must understand that the provision in the S. 1932 that will permit certain people to apply for adjustment of status (I-485) even during the period of visa retrogression will not apply to those who go through the consular immigrant proceeding. This means that those who have been waiting for the visa number outside of the U.S. to start the consular immigrant visa proceedings will not be able to get any help from this legislation. They will remain "subject" to the visa retrogression and until the visa number becomes available, they will not be able to apply for the immigrant visa for years from now. Those, who had already started the consular immigrant visa proceedings to take advantage of speedy processing in some consulates like Montreal, Canada or whatever and then remain stuck with the visa number retrogression, may be able to file I-485 application regardless of the visa retrogression, if they will be physically present in the U.S. at the time when this bill is enacted into law and the USCIS starts implementing the law.
Once this bill is enacted into law, there will be a huge difference between the consular immigrant visa processsing and the USCIS I-485 adjustment processing. Under the visa retrogression environment, it will make no sense that one considers a consular immigrant visa proceeding once this bill is enacted into law. This may sound unfair to those who will have to go through the consular proceeding as they are present outside of the U.S., but the intent of this legislation is to give a relief to those who will have to face a tremendous hardship after spending years of endurance and hard work and have been stricken by the lightening ball of visa retrogression. This bill amends Section 245 of the immigration statute which applies only to the I-485 application proceedings for those who are physically present in the United States.
 
Pd

How far PD is expected to go ??
I agree it won't be current. But it will move to 2002 atleast ?

Ali_Sabri said:
1-Exemption of All Dependents from the Visa Count
2-Recapture Up to 90,000 Unused Visa Numbers Each Year

do u agree with me?
also usefull for consular processing
 
should pd go forward

anyway to have green card if matter for you,,the pd should go forward in all types,,
i think it will move by new bill,,,,may be 2002 for india as it was on january 2004
 
The PD for EB-1 is Aug 2002. Any guess, how far it may move forward if S.1932 bill becomes a law and all unused EB numbers are recap? How many guys out there with EB-1 retro?


June04 said:
How far PD is expected to go ??
I agree it won't be current. But it will move to 2002 atleast ?
 
Top