No Title
Not just based on the May 99 approval. I guess that is one of the reasons. Just the spread in the 99 approvals is a little scary. Even if we accept that there are two teams, one working on 98 and other on 99 cases, Jan 99 to May 99 is a large enough spread and cause for concern don\'t you think? How much of a spread in RDs of approved cases is enough before we characterize processing as random? I don\'t want to overanalyze, but still can\'t help feeling a little depressed.