For all those who have filed under the "Future employment", if this
is true, it is too good to be true.
Check out this gov. circular:
http://www.immigration.gov/graphics/lawsregs/handbook/I140_AC21_8403.pdf
<quote>
In all cases an offer of employment must
have been bona fide, and the employer must have had the intent, at the time the Form I-140 was
approved, to employ the beneficiary upon adjustment. It should be noted that there is no
requirement in statute or regulations that a beneficiary of a Form I-140 actually be in the
underlying employment until permanent residence is authorized. Therefore, it is possible for an
alien to qualify for the provisions of §106(c) of AC21 even if he or she has never been employed
by the prior petitioning employer or the subsequent employer under section 204(j) of the Act.
</quote>
Am i just wishing it or is it really true that what this 'official' document says is that "no requirement that a benificiary of a Form i-140 actually be in the underlying employement utill permenent residence is authorized".
Sooooooo , tell me if i having being Nightmare for nothing ( i am in "future employement") ; with my Lawyer telling me doom and gloom stories for not having joined my sponsoring employer after getting my EAD(12 months ago!).
Look, i know there are a number of guys that are in the same "future employement" boat as me. How about we form a sort of sub-group that tackles our concerns and thoughts????
is true, it is too good to be true.
Check out this gov. circular:
http://www.immigration.gov/graphics/lawsregs/handbook/I140_AC21_8403.pdf
<quote>
In all cases an offer of employment must
have been bona fide, and the employer must have had the intent, at the time the Form I-140 was
approved, to employ the beneficiary upon adjustment. It should be noted that there is no
requirement in statute or regulations that a beneficiary of a Form I-140 actually be in the
underlying employment until permanent residence is authorized. Therefore, it is possible for an
alien to qualify for the provisions of §106(c) of AC21 even if he or she has never been employed
by the prior petitioning employer or the subsequent employer under section 204(j) of the Act.
</quote>
Am i just wishing it or is it really true that what this 'official' document says is that "no requirement that a benificiary of a Form i-140 actually be in the underlying employement utill permenent residence is authorized".
Sooooooo , tell me if i having being Nightmare for nothing ( i am in "future employement") ; with my Lawyer telling me doom and gloom stories for not having joined my sponsoring employer after getting my EAD(12 months ago!).
Look, i know there are a number of guys that are in the same "future employement" boat as me. How about we form a sort of sub-group that tackles our concerns and thoughts????