BrainDrain
Registered Users (C)
Is it true that the EB3 India would be further retrogressed ?
BrainDrain said:Is it true that the EB3 India would be further retrogressed ?
kamrans said:From the statements of the representative of DOS and USCIS this is evident that it will happen not only for India but for ROW as well.
Good Luck to all.
Chocolate said:Is it possible that EB2 ROW will also go back in dates.for eb3 though ROW category is not much different from India dates.Any inputs.
BrainDrain said:Is it true that the EB3 India would be further retrogressed ?
saras76 said:Chocolate,
Everyone is trying to file in EB2 now. This will no doubt increase pressue on EB2. In a few years EB2 will be just as bad if not worse than EB3.
regards,
saras
Chocolate said:Thanks for the info.But the ROW for EB2 is always current right i have never seen retro in that .Is it possible that the dates go back for it too. I have 2 pending labor applications and 1 is eb3 and 1 is eb2 .I am mostly interested in eb2 one as i can file for ead/ap as soon as labor is approved. so will it be that dates will go back for eb2 category for row so soon. any inputs
HBG2001 said:I agree. It can get any worse than this. Unless many Substitued Labors with Old PDs come into stream or USCIS runs out of EB3 numbers for FY2006, further retrogression may be unlikely. Anyway, let us wait for August bulletin and see if we can make something out of it.
-Thanks
techy2468 said:Brain drain......sorry but you dont make much sense........i totally understand the frustatration of everyone around.....but that is no reason to make illogical statements
alexberg said:You are the first one to figure it out - it is a cunning plan on the part of the US government to slow-down Chinese and Indian economies by driving skilled people from those two countries back where they came from
BrainDrain said:Also lets face it, though H1 B's get the necessary skilled workers that US needs, the program is also being exploited by lots of employers by employing foreigners even when they have Americans available to do these jobs. They do not need these H1 B's forever.
GCdreamer2006 said:Let's forget polls for a minute and let's talk about or own research:
I do consultancy for a major software maker housed in Seattle. They are looking desperately for IT folks there. I got four offers so far - and even if I had my US citizenship or GC - I would prefer not to work there, unless I had no other choice. I have many friends working there and many of them tell me that it is a high turn over environment, people get burnt out often and leave. I know that company is lobbying hard for H1Bs. That's a typical scenario in which it is hard to find "qualified US candidates". If the company changes its management practices, culture, offer more benefits, better wages and mainly, stop squeezing people to a 60h-80h week working hours week, could they attract more Americans there ? I will leave the conclusion up to you.