Frustrated! Reply for 2nd query through congresswoman

vidongre

Registered Users (C)
In reply to the 1st query, they asked to wait for 30-60 days. Now this reply -

The finger prints and FBI name check has cleared. Another liaison in the unit has already requested these files based on previous inquiry. They will forward to be assigned to an officer. I would anticipate that applicants will hear more about pending decision within 60-90 days.
 
Officially VSC's I-485 processing date is 01/31/02. So I suggest that you can send a expedite request to VSC director by e-mail and by fax.

Goodluck!!!!!
 
Not fair

It is not fair for people like you to wait this long and having UCSIS adjudicating 03 cases! The problem is that there is no accountability and too much "excuse" based on Security checks. I do not know you but your security risk is NIL. The problem is that we innocent people are paying all these. That is why, I objected two things wrt the lausuit: The interim GC and pending security checks. The government does not have a 100% technical error-proof capability to check all databases and thus cannot be trusted. There are databases scattered over 29 federal and state agencies...Good luck to all.

You can search for "expedite" on this forum: I think the VSC FAX number for Expedite is

VSC EXPEDITE FAX # 802-527-4913
VSC EXPEDITE FAX # (used for AP ??)802-527-4816

and if you missed the Ombudsman, send him an e-mail at

prakash.khatri@dhs.gov
 
Last edited by a moderator:
vidongre,
I am of the same mind what Edison wrote. Also try to get in touch with senator in yr area .Write him/her entire history and call that office time and again. I did follow up with Senator as well as congressman in my area ,and I think it worked for me. Another thing is you may now prepare for plaintiff for 485 litigation suit. I am feeling bad what CIS is playing with yr application.
 
This sux

I had the exact same response though not as detailed.

"Another liaison in the unit has already requested these files based on previous inquiry. They will forward to be assigned to an officer. "

What inquiry would this be? If you got an RFE, then you would have submitted paperwork long back. That is wierd.

Did you come on J1 by any chance?
 
Re: This sux

I thought the previous inquiry was the one that we made in December through the same congresswoman... God knows what they did in the past 60 days...


No I came on H1B, am in status throughout and am still with the sponsoring employer.
 
Liaison

"Another liaison" = Congressional liaison.

Since you probably requested some kind of Congressional inquiry, your files were moved to this liaison. They will go back where they belong, eventually and gather more dust..
 
Re: Liaison

Cinta,

I didn't understand your comment. what do you mean by "They will go back where they belong, eventually and gather more dust.." ?

Is it good or bad that the files were moved to this liaison?
 
Re: Re: Liaison

Originally posted by vidongre
Cinta,

I didn't understand your comment. what do you mean by "They will go back where they belong, eventually and gather more dust.." ?

Is it good or bad that the files were moved to this liaison?

It is neither good or bad. This is the sequence of events in the case one requests Congressional inquiry. The files are moved to the Congressional liaison and then they will go back for processing. This move can last several months, I think. I will post a ref. soon.
 
VSC is processing as of 08/07/01 as per tier2

Vidgore,

I just spoke with tier2 regarding my case, made status inquiry 3 times, today when I called I was connected with tier2, after 15 miniutes of wait, she gets back to me saying VSC is processing as of 08/07/01, I mentioned to her that as per online everywhere VSC is showing as of 01/31/02, she said they are working on backlogs and they are processing as of 08/07/01, so I need to wait couple of months for my case to get processed.

This really SUCKS.

Have already applied for 3EAD, no sign so far, my current EAD has expired.

My details
RD 12/21/01
FP2 08/16/03
3rd EAD applied 12/15/03

Waiting forever and ever and ever and.............
 
Congress

This is a view from an attorney: It does not mean is true of false. Take it as is:


Many people who have had to deal with the Immigration and Naturalization
Service quickly discover that the INS is inefficient and unfair in its treatment
of aliens. The INS unreasonably delays the processing of many applications
such as application for naturalization and adjustment of status.

In their frustration, many applicants and their families seek assistance from
their Congressional Representatives and Senators. However, assistance
from congressional persons rarely produce any results. In fact, those who
seek assistance from Washington soon discover that their effort to expedite
their case has caused even longer delays.

Those who seek assistance from their Congressperson or Senator
mistakenly believe that the Congressperson or Senator personally contacts
the INS. If the Congressperson or Senator actually picked up the phone and
called Doris Meissner, the Commissioner for INS, then and only then could
you expect results to occur. However, the reality of how an elected official
handles a request for intervention with INS does not result in a personal
phone call to the INS Commissioner or anyone else.

When a request for intervention is received by the Congressperson's office, it
is actually a low level assistant who reads the letter. The request letter never
reaches the desk of the Congressperson. The assistant prepares a
memorandum that is attached to the request letter. The assistant then
forwards a memorandum to the INS. INS routes it to the Congressional
Liaison Unit. This unit then sends for the file. This usually takes a few
months for INS to find the file. Then the file sits in the Congressional Liaison
Unit for a few more months awaiting a clerk to review and respond. In the
meantime, the original unit such as the Examination Section can no longer
act on the file simply because it is at the Liaison Unit.

When the file is finally returned to the responsible unit for adjudication, it is
now placed at the bottom of the pile. I suspect that is the punishment for
having the nerve to complain in the first place. The Congressional INS Unit
responds with the usual excuses by stating that they are understaffed and
overworked but they are taking the matter very seriously, and if they can be
of any further assistance, please write them again about "this matter of
mutual concern." This useless response letter is then forwarded to the
applicant with a cover letter from the Congressperson's office stating that
they hope the letter is of some assistance to them. And, if they need any
more assistance, just let them know.

By this time reality is now setting-in. After a few more months have elapsed,
the alien finally hires an attorney who, hopefully, has the wherewithal to
force INS to adjudicate the case.

The Law Office of XXXX does not want this to happen to anyone.
That is why we don't waste time with needless bureaucratic inquiries. Our
reputation for aggressive representation results in most of our cases being
approved without the need for further action. In those occasions when our
clients' cases are unfairly delayed or not treated properly, we seek
immediate court intervention thereby forcing INS to act on our clients' cases.


The Law Office of XXXX is the leader in its field in this area of
law. We use our experience and resources to insure that the INS acts on
our clients' cases. Our law office obtains positive results for our clients
because we demand nothing less.
 
A different Story..

Thanks for the excerpt, cinta.

Please read this thread Dec 01 Approved

In this case, the senator inquiry started on Jan 12 and case was approved by Jan 28. Even if we assume, that the inquiry didn't help in approval, but the senator's office was able to give a detailed status reply in a decent time frame.

Any thoughts....
 
cinta

That story is not entirely accurate. In my case, the Senator's office was very helpful in pushing for final adjudication. When I first initiated an enquiry for second FP generation, they wrote back saying it would be done within 60 days. I got the FP generated as soon as the request went in and on the day the congressional assistant wrote to me -- elapsed time: 7 days. Further, after the 60 days were up, the person at the Senator's office followed it up on his own and emailed me saying that FBI clearance is done and I should expect a judgement within 4 to 6 weeks. In fact, he forwarded the email he received from the congressional liaison officer at VSC. I could see the email thread where she says to him that she's requested my file to be moved for final adjudication ASAP. And, my case was approved in three weeks hence!
 
Re: A different Story..

Originally posted by gc_lotto
Thanks for the excerpt, cinta.

Please read this thread Dec 01 Approved

In this case, the senator inquiry started on Jan 12 and case was approved by Jan 28. Even if we assume, that the inquiry didn't help in approval, but the senator's office was able to give a detailed status reply in a decent time frame.

Any thoughts....

The post (my post) has a headline: take it as is!

In your case, you used the FAX, E_MAIL and SENATOR! Plus you were a DEC 2001 case. Your case is thus different than the above cases where only a Congressional inquiry was utilised. In any case we gave the advise for them to do the same. Do you know exactly what and how and all the timing events that took place for your approval? If you do maybe we should all follow your case in the same timely sequence!
 
Communication Gap...

The thread which I attached wasn't mine. The approval isn't mine either.

I am a Feb-02 filer, waiting my approval more than 5 months after my 2nd FP. No RFE. No nothing. Website still showing 1st FP results being received.

After reading that thread (which I attached above), I got excited and sent email, FAX to VSC and also initiated senator's inquiry (for the first time). The senator is Dianne Feinstein. Her staff told that, VSC is processing Jan-02 cases and that I should wait 60 days. I was thinking of pressuring the senator's office to do an inquiry with VSC before the processing date moves to Feb-02.

But, now after reading this thread, I think I will hold off and not push the senator's staff.. After all, I don't want to mess up things, when the end seems to be near (if my sight is good after all.. :()

Thanks all for all your input and keep going..
 
gc_lotto
Stella ( Diane Feinstiens Senators office ) did good job for my case . She did gave me exact status of my application and exact days when it will be seen,the reply from adjucation officer . First she said in 60 days then after 60 days were over she enquired and told 30 days more which is Feb end. I definately see my online message changed on 24th Feb . I am waiting for aproval notice. I Just made follow up politely with Senators office.
 
Kash777, You're correct

I too find Stella, to be a very professional and helpful staff member of fienstein's office.

I just got off the phone with her, and she said, she is currently querying on cases that were faxed to the senator's office on feb 2nd and she would query my case in next 3 weeks.

She has always called me back and I am hopeful that I will know more about my case with her help.
 
Top