No Title
Dominant idea: Some say that there is nothing new about the new law if you applied for AOS before Oct 17,2000. In othere words, there is NO JOB FLEXIBILIY for most AOS applicants (around 90%).
Reasoning: This is because the law doesn\'t use the future tense. So when it was enacted (on Oct 17), it used the presesnt tense, thus making it ONLY applicable to employees who applied after Oct 17, 2000.
My opinion: It doesn\'t make sense. This is because many people are expected to cancel their AOS application and reapply after Oct 17 in order to make use of the new law. But this is too much overhead for the INS to handle; therefore, the new law will become effective to old applicants in the near future (i.e., less than a year from now, after Lawyers start asking to extend the new law).
In case you are in a hurry to change employers while on AOS, then please ask whether the I-140 redo required. If not, then there is noting to argue about. Just take your I-140 from the original employer and use it with the new employer who is willing to apply AOS for you. In this case, don\'t worry about AOS portability because you don\'t need it anymore because the I-140 and LC are the most consuming things. So start with a new AOS application with the new company and make use of the new law later (i.e., when you have worked 180 days at the new company).
Just think about whether I-140 is portable. This is because if you stay in the status quo, then you have no job flexibility. I assume you applied prior to Oct 17, 2000. Why wait until INS start clarifying to whom AOS portability law is valid? Why wait for the restrictions to be imposed (if any)?
The main question is:
Can the original I-140 be used for a new but similar occupation that\'s in the same metropolitan area if your AOS application was filed prior to OCT 17, 2000?