Final verion / dsatish

cinta

Registered Users (C)
dsatish,

Please see if you incorporate the appendices in the letter. See if you can entertain my comments as well as others. For an interesting article in its presentation and language, please reference,
"www.ilaf.org/ipc/ipf0402.asp"
For your convenience, here is the list again. Cheers
Appendix A: Draft version. Problems caused by Processing delays.

1: Hardships in our daily lives. As the EAD mostly serves our companies to a certain extent, we find ourselves with almost no legal status in the U.S. This is reflected in a lot of every day needs. A lot of states make it impossible to apply for a Driver license or even permit. Mortgage companies make it difficult or take advantage of the lack of the "green card". Investment companies require proof of citizenship or permanent residency for us to invest. All of these make us feel insecure, unable to plan or predict for ourselves and our families

2: Hardships in our working environment. The American workplace is structured in such a way that does not really recognize the EAD as a proof of residency. This is evident from the various companies Legal departments regarding the definition of a U.S. permanent resident. We are excluded from this definition. In many instances, the TPS is included. This often creates discrimination in the work place. As we have no legal representation our civil or labor rights may be violated and we have no choice.

3: Career hardships. The American economy is distinguished by its dynamic mobility and change under different economic and social periods, like recession and growth. The employee is supposed to adjust accordingly. Due to these delays we are not able to make any adjustments. The lack of the permanent residency makes it difficult for us to change jobs in the same company or another company, get promoted or simply decide to get a leave of absence for any personal or family reason. AC-21 regulations are only in a Memo statement subject again to the individual adjudicator interpretation.

4: Problems with Incompatibility with Government regulations. The workplace is governed by a lot of regulations from the Government often incompatible with our status. These again are "classified", "export control", "technology sensitive" and a lot of others coming from the various departments like State, Defense, Commerce, Labor and DHS. These often present a lot of obstacles and fear of violation. The only way to make us free of these regulations and restrictions is the approval of our application. There is no middle status as far as all these are concerned. One is either a permanent citizen or not.

5: Impact on Immigration process and Citizenship. Our process is probably the longest of Immigration with the Labor Certificate (LC), the I-140 application and the I-485 all of which are experiencing unfair delays. The whole process of Immigration with Employment becomes so difficult to apply. Companies maybe unable to "sponsor" somebody for a permanent job position after four or five years. From our point of view, our Citizenship eligibility gets postponed into the dark future.


Appendix B: Draft version. Our role and contribution.

1: We all work in a diverse array of jobs, sustaining on our part the ailing American economy. This is the basis of the Employment based Immigration.

2: We all pay federal, state, city, social security and unemployment taxes. In this way we contribute to all these funds supporting fellow American employees out of work or searching. It should be also noted that we do not claim unemployment benefits. Homeowners pay property and school taxes, thus supporting our communities and cities we live in.

3: Members of our group contribute towards the Homeland and National security, through their jobs in many different ways. It is unfair to be treated worse than criminals in many instances.

Appendix C: Draft version. Causes for Processing Delays.

1: Reorganization of INS into the BCIS under DHS. The priorities changed with DHS heavily weighted toward immigration policies that may make sense from an isolated enforcement prospective, but which show little understanding of how America's immigration policy relates to the U.S. economy or society, or to America's place in the world.

2: Availability of Resources. Allocated funds to the BCIS do not seem to be adequate, in view of the Backlogs. The number of adjudicators is not enough also, as they are most often assigned to higher priority immigration groups.

3: The number of experienced adjudicators is questionable especially after the reorganization. This results in a non-uniform adjudication process, unfair to the applicants.

4: The EB I-485 applications are the lowest priority right now. This really is meaningless, unfair and suspicious. We as a group deserve at least the same priority as the TPS and religious workers. Actually we should be at the top, as we contribute to the Government coffins in the form of TAXES and Unemployment taxes. Our contributions help all Americans including the TPS. We DO NOT RECEIVE UNEMPLOYMENT or any other benefits, but only pay towards these.

5: The current political climate, especially post September 11 along with a weak economy has created an anti-immigration sentiment in sections of the society and the Government. A look at current Congressional bills reveals this. We as a group, we are being ignored again. In this society and Government there are only two classes of people, the citizens (including permanent residents) and the non-citizens. We are in no man's land.

6: Security checks from a host of agencies (FBI, CIA, Customs, etc), separate watch lists from about half a dozen agencies, incompatibility of systems and databases all contribute to the current delays. Criminals in a lot of states are eligible for Driver licenses. We are not. It is also not clear how often these security checks are performed and by whom. It has become an infinite security process, which really treats us unfairly again.

7: ZERO TOLERANCE. The legacy of the previous BCIS director, has created such a fear among the adjudicators and has resulted in the current delays and other venues such as the transfers (transfer of responsibility), the more frequent RFEs, most of them unfounded and more denials, most of them unfair. This climate should change.

COMMENTS:

1): who we are: we need to state clearly that we are the Employment based I-485 applicants and briefly mention the process of LC, I-140 and I-485. We can collect a cross array of our job fields and include them. For example, Sciences, Research, Internet, Medical, Engineering, Computers, Bio, Chemistry. This instantly creates a memory image and shows that we are not picking their rotten apples and oranges on demand, nor we jumped any fences to come here.

2): our contribution. We need to expand our contribution to the American economy and its place in the global workplace. We need to state clearly the TAXES we pay and that we are proudly applicants of no unemployment or welfare. We are on the contrary the contributors to these coffers. This way we can show the unfairness and injustice done.

Additional comments: Let us anticipate the simple answer. BCIS is doing all it can and besides you guys have EAD to keep working. In this case, we need to show that the EAD does not solve our problems (see appendices) but actually perpetuates them forever. It does even allow us to reach our full potential and give this nation innumerable more benefits.

Finally, we are doing this as a group. Each member is valuable and can have a contribution to the Petition letter. Based on this, let us add somewhere in the contributions section/paragraph that not only we contribute to the Economy but also to the Homeland and National Security. I can claim this for myself and I believe there may be others with a similar claim. If not, even my presence alone qualifies the statement. In this way we provide them with something unknown and uncover the hypocricy. This is also important as the BCIS is under DHS and this is the pre-occupation of the Nation, not to mention that all the policies start from there.
Thanks and keep up the good work. We have very few friends around!

CORRECTION: The website is "www.ailf.org"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
4: The EB I-485 applications are the lowest priority right now. This really is meaningless, unfair and suspicious. We as a group deserve at least the same priority as the TPS and religious workers. Actually we should be at the top, as we contribute to the Government coffins in the form of TAXES and Unemployment taxes. Our contributions help all Americans including the TPS. We DO NOT RECEIVE UNEMPLOYMENT or any other benefits, but only pay towards these.

I presume you meant 'coffers', right?
 
There needs to be some more info in terms of $$ amounts, like for example, we are contributing to the tune of $ xxx (just a ball park figure not too exagurated) from the past 2-3 years (from the time we started our process (I am Sep 01 -- still waiting ) towards state/federal/county/other taxes, out of which we the contributor get nothing back.

The driver's licence thing is a good point.

Just my 2 cents worth. Any body need to get offline on any topic I can be reached on my personal emal vsagaram@yahoo.com

This is really a good effort, and we shall all hope for the best !!
 
driver's licence point is not a good point at all. Drivers license does not require GC. It requires only SSN
 
In the appendix, you said you don't feel respected, safe, but that's what the americans want your feel, they don't want you to feel you belong to this place at all.
 
I think this is wrong

The entire stuff is too negative and 2 me looks like a baby whining . We should start off with praising BCIS and how it is trying to cope with the security issues and then start bashing it. 2 much negative will never get positive. We have to be polite and not complaining. We should be firm and not pleading.
I think driving Permit is not that big an issue compared to the fact that longer time taken to process 485 means more mental burden and no feeling of belongness to a place.
Just my 2 cents. Dont bash it up.

BTW DSATISH is wrong. You need proof of legal immigration like EAD to get your DL. It is now mandatory and in some cases it does go to BCIS for confirmation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
WRONG

Originally posted by dsatish
driver's licence point is not a good point at all. Drivers license does not require GC. It requires only SSN
dsatish,

Respectfully, you are absolutely wrong. PA and more states will not issue even a PERMIT with SS and EAD. Driver licence is a very good point but ONLY one. It shows the collapse of the system between Federal and State policies. Some states they can issue Driver Licence with a SS alone? Maybe, but we are showing the bad states. Even one of them shows the policy.
Note: I tried to get Permit for my wife TWICE, with SS and EAD. NO, NO.
 
Originally posted by dengdeng
I don't like Appendix A. When you try to persuade someone to help you, you want to persude him it's in his benefit to help you not yours. The reason listed in Appendix A are only benefits for us, not to the government. Such as driver license, mortgage....
Government ppl won't feel its in their urgent need to help us get green card. And we shouldn't emphasize on those things. we can mention it, but not in details.

Remember, government want to show us the door, they want to save the jobs for americans. so they don't care about our career goal, or ambition, or whatsoever. We need point out, clean backlog will help the government to identify fraud application, terrorists and save them budget and resource. I think that what they are interested in. I'll try to find out the original AC21 proposal, see why the government pass such a law. We can copy the reason.
dengdeng,
The appendices were put in a draft format for everybody like you to comment. We need to show why we want a change from the current status. Those are the reasons we want our GC today, not tomorrow. If there are no concrete cases then we can stay on EAD for years. Do you want to become a US citizen one day? I do, ASAP.
Can you find more reasons to be added?
 
America

Originally posted by dengdeng
In the appendix, you said you don't feel respected, safe, but that's what the americans want your feel, they don't want you to feel you belong to this place at all.

America is too big to be defined like that. Once you prove yourself, anybody's feelings towards you become irrelevant. There will always be racism but it is up to us and everybody to change it.
 
Re: I think this is wrong

Originally posted by gambler
The entire stuff is too negative and 2 me looks like a baby whining . We should start off with praising BCIS and how it is trying to cope with the security issues and then start bashing it. 2 much negative will never get positive. We have to be polite and not complaining. We should be firm and not pleading.
I think driving Permit is not that big an issue compared to the fact that longer time taken to process 485 means more mental burden and no feeling of belongness to a place.
Just my 2 cents. Dont bash it up.

BTW DSATISH is wrong. You need proof of legal immigration like EAD to get your DL. It is now mandatory and in some cases it does go to BCIS for confirmation.

Well, if you have it is not an issue. It becomes an issue when you do not. As an example it shows exactly what you said "not belonging". The state laws, federal laws and the rest know only citizens and non-citizens.
 
Yes

Originally posted by mavishka
4: The EB I-485 applications are the lowest priority right now. This really is meaningless, unfair and suspicious. We as a group deserve at least the same priority as the TPS and religious workers. Actually we should be at the top, as we contribute to the Government coffins in the form of TAXES and Unemployment taxes. Our contributions help all Americans including the TPS. We DO NOT RECEIVE UNEMPLOYMENT or any other benefits, but only pay towards these.

I presume you meant 'coffers', right?

Yes, exactly.
 
Paragraph 2 should be omitted.. Most US businesses include a non-discrimination policy that applies equally toward citizens and non-citizens.. The idea expressed in the paragraph is quite vague and certainly doesn't help strengthen the case..

BTW, "dynamic mobility" is paragraph 3 is a tautology. Defining something as "dynamic" always implies a certain degree of mobility.
 
Top