I can't help but notice that there are very few denials each month at the asylum office. I wonder what that implies.
This is an example from NYAO but they all seem similar. In one month;
637 cases completed, 9 denials, 121 approvals, rest referred to immigration court.
Clearly most cases are just referred. But since applicants in status cannot be referred, I wonder which of the following it implies;
1) Since in status cases are 'low priority' they aren't among the completed cases in the first place - that is why we wait longer to get decisions?
2) In status cases cases are not denied often
3) There are very few in status cases to begin with
This is an example from NYAO but they all seem similar. In one month;
637 cases completed, 9 denials, 121 approvals, rest referred to immigration court.
Clearly most cases are just referred. But since applicants in status cannot be referred, I wonder which of the following it implies;
1) Since in status cases are 'low priority' they aren't among the completed cases in the first place - that is why we wait longer to get decisions?
2) In status cases cases are not denied often
3) There are very few in status cases to begin with