DIGS said:
Well, talking about processing dates, the latest update from each centers show only NSC stuck at Dec.2003, while all others are at March & April, 2005. Are the concerned Authorities sleeping with their eyes wide open ? This is scenario is for several months now. I have also requested my Attorney to initiate enquiry into such differences. I dont know if he is going to do anything.
Maybe by this month end, I might write to the Congressmen in charge of Immigration.
DIGS
DIGS,
A couple of ideas to suggest to the congressman, in case you do contact him:
1) It is ridiculous that USCIS issues APs and EADs that are valid just for 1 year. The average time it is taking for the I-485 stage is more than 2 years. Why can't USCIS issue the above mentioned for 2 or 3 years or indefinitely i.e until the approval or denial of I-485. Its in USCIS interest that they reduce the number of applications being filed. For each GC application filed with USCIS, they receive multiple AP and EAD applications. All the additional applications have to be processed. This takes time and resources. This directly affects the actual I-485/I-140 applications' processing time.
2) The same could be said about the fingerprinting. By making these valid for only 1 year to 1 1/2 years, the application process gets delayed further.
3) Yearly extension of H1 visa beyond six years is also very expensive to the individual/company and ties up USCIS resources. This should be valid until the I-485 has been either approved or denied.
4) The above scenarios not result in delay in process, but cause the applicant and USCIS to spend more money.
5) Assuming USCIS is reluctant to lose the revenue from multiple EAD/AP applications, they can give the applicants the option to choose from the current yearly option or choose an option where the applicant will have to apply only once, with the second option's fee being considerably higher. With these options, the applicant will have to option to either pay a one time higher fee or multiple lower fees. USCIS will not have to lose revenue. Instead of having the current status-quo, atleast USCIS will have the option to reduce the number of applications and that as we know is the key to the whole backlog reduction.
If USCIS decides to issue only one EAD/AP with a validity of more than 1 year, the number of GC related applications (I-140 and I-485) can be reduced by almost
30%. I'm not pulling these numbers out of my hat. Here's the analysis behind it:
GC process consists (generally) of 4 applications:
I-140
I-485 (Adjustment of Status)
I-131(Advance Parole)
I-765(Employment Authorization)
Total: 4
Based on the fact that I-485 is taking atleast 2 years(if you are lucky). We can expect additonal applications for I-131 and I-765
The new total is now 6 applications.
So for each GC application, USCIS has to process 6 applications at this time. This is likely to increase considering the retrogression.
So if we take an average of 6 applications per GC we get:
% in reduction = 2/6 * 100 = 33.33%
Bear with me please. I'm explaining this is to you as you might have to explain it to a congressman.
Correct me if I'm wrong with either my math or my logic.
Members of this forum, please consider any new ideas or corrections to mine. Like Benjamin Franlin said.."We must all hang together or most assuredly we will hang separately".
Contrary to the general belief that we temporary workers are cheap labor, I do believe that we are smart and intelligent enough(atleast I can vouch for myself
![Wink ;) ;)]()
) to come up with even more innovative ideas.
Let the debating begin