All
Is any body in the same boat. I recently got my labour certified (after 2 and 1/2 years) from california . Previously in July' 2003 my employer filed a I-140 (alone) using subs. labour
Now I asked my employer to revoke that one and file using my own labour ( 140 + 485). They asked me to reimburse the amount they paid to attorney during filing of I-140 (using subs. lanour)
As per my employer that amount would be $6000 or so. Do you think its a reasonable figure ??? As I understand Averagely attorney charge around $5000 for the complete GC process.
As per my employer they charge heavily if you file I-140 using subs. labour. I fail to understand why it is so.
Can anybody has similar experince or give me a proper advice.
Thanks
Is any body in the same boat. I recently got my labour certified (after 2 and 1/2 years) from california . Previously in July' 2003 my employer filed a I-140 (alone) using subs. labour
Now I asked my employer to revoke that one and file using my own labour ( 140 + 485). They asked me to reimburse the amount they paid to attorney during filing of I-140 (using subs. lanour)
As per my employer that amount would be $6000 or so. Do you think its a reasonable figure ??? As I understand Averagely attorney charge around $5000 for the complete GC process.
As per my employer they charge heavily if you file I-140 using subs. labour. I fail to understand why it is so.
Can anybody has similar experince or give me a proper advice.
Thanks