Child Citizenship Act (CCA) information

boatbod

Registered Users (C)
In the light of recent discussions concerning child citizenship under N-600 and N-600K, I thought people might be interested in the following Appendix to the USCIS Adjudicators Handbook.

Appendix 71-7 Implementation Instructions for Title I of the Child Citizenship Act of 2000.

Of particular interest is the section covering how officers are to handle cases where children have been living outside of the US. Text of that section follows:

Lawful Admission and Maintenance of Status


To qualify under section 320 of the CCA, applicants must establish not only that they have been admitted to the United States as lawful permanent residents, but also that they are “residing in” the United States pursuant to admission in such status. Admission in any immigrant classification satisfies the lawful permanent resident requirement. A more difficult question is raised by the requirement that the applicant be “residing in” the United States. Under the section 101(a)(33) of the Act, “residence” is d efined as “the place of general abode; the place of general abode of a person means his principal, actual dwelling place in fact, without regard to intent." On the other hand, in certain circumstances, an alien with lawful permanent resident status may live outside the United States without losing that status, and for some purposes U.S. citizens living outside the United States are considered to still have a residence in the United States.


The Service, in conjunction with the Department of State, is reviewing the legal question of whether, and if so, under what circumstances, a child with lawful permanent resident status who is actually living outside the United States can be described as “residing in” the United States for purposes of the CCA. Until this question is resolved, the Service and Department of State will only document as a United States citizen a child in two instances. First, the child will qualify if on or after February 27,200 1, the child is admitted as a lawful permanent resident and actually living in the United States. Second, the child will qualify if the child was previously admitted as a lawful permanent resident, but was absent from the United States on February 27, 2001, the child will qualify only if that child has returned to the United States and was re-admitted as a lawful permanent resident. The child must also be in the legal and physical custody of the U.S. citizen parent. The Service and Department of State, in t he interim, will regard that child as residing in the United States.


Under section 322 of the Act, a foreign-born child who resides outside the United States must be lawfully admitted to the United States and maintain such lawful status until the application for certificate of citizenship is approved and the oath of allegiance administered (unless waived). “Admission” is defined under section 101(a)(13)(A) of the Act. A child may be admitted in any nonimmigrant classification. A child is considered to have maintained lawful status if his or her nonimmigrant classification ha s not been revoked or has not expired by operation of law.


The Service should determine whether an applicant has maintained such lawful status by reviewing the Form I-94, Arrival-Departure Record. Applicants should be permitted to submit this information at the time of examination, as many section 322 applications are filed prior to the child's actual entry into the U.S. on a nonimmigrant visa.
 
boatbod, thanks for the post, it's very interesting.

Here goes a trick question, for which I don't have an answer:
Family has a child, child has a Green Card, child is under 18, child goes out of the country for study or vacation, and during child's stay out of the country, the parents do the oath. When does that child become an automatic citizen, when the child gets admitted at the border, or while staying outside of the country, at the time the parents do the oath?

Originally I would have thought the child becomes a citizen at the time the child gets admitted back to the country with a GC. This clear as mud implementation is not too clear in this aspect, but it seems that perhaps my interpretation is valid, at least until they solve those legal aspects they are studying.

My 2 cents.
 
My understanding...

The child becomes a citizen at the moment that all of the statutory requirements are met. So, in your case, the child will become a citizen at the moment he/she begins to reside in the US in the physical custody of the US Citizen parent.

Now, consider the case of a child who automagically became a citizen, and then, at a later date moves to another country (whether the country of his birth or some other country). The child never submitted an N-600. That's when an N-600K comes into play. The child satisfied all of the CCA rules at some point in his life, became a citizen and now wants a citizenship cert, so he/she applies from outside the country.

My $0.02
 
My understanding...

The child becomes a citizen at the moment that all of the statutory requirements are met. So, in your case, the child will become a citizen at the moment he/she begins to reside in the US in the physical custody of the US Citizen parent.

That would be my interpretation too.

Now, consider the case of a child who automagically became a citizen, and then, at a later date moves to another country (whether the country of his birth or some other country). The child never submitted an N-600. That's when an N-600K comes into play. The child satisfied all of the CCA rules at some point in his life, became a citizen and now wants a citizenship cert, so he/she applies from outside the country.

My $0.02

My understanding of N-600K is a little different. From what I've read, I think it applies more to a situation where a USC parent lives abroad with a non-citizen child in their custody. Providing the parent has met prior residency requirements (5yrs... blah, blah) they can apply for citizenship for the child. The big differences between N-600 and N-600K are:
- N-600 child must be LPR residing with the USC parent in the US
- N-600K child does not have to be an LPR, but must be normally residing with the USC parent (presumably outside of the US), and lawfully admitted (temporarily at least) to the US for the purposes of filing N-600K application.

Seems like really bizarre and confusing rules....

Flydog - in the hypothetical situation you describe, where a child moves abroad after previously meeting all requirements of N-600, I believe they should still be able to claim citizenship through the regular N-600 route. They just have to prove they were resident and in the custody of the USC parent at the time of the parent's naturalization.
 
Could be. I tend to become pretty knowlegeable of the rules that pertain to me. If they have nothing to do with me, well, then, ...
 
Top