Changes Aim to Speed Immigration Cases

macchupicchu

Registered Users (C)
Well ... not exactly :rolleyes:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060426/ap_on_re_us/naturalization_delays

Changes Aim to Speed Immigration Cases

DETROIT - With an Arab-American rights group threatening mass court filings, a U.S. immigration spokesman said Tuesday that the government would change its naturalization procedures to stave off such legal challenges.

Lawyers say it's not uncommon for cases to be delayed for years, particularly for people from the Middle East, even though immigration officials are supposed to rule on naturalization petitions within 120 days after interviews.

To call attention to the problem, the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee was coordinating an effort by 40 attorneys to file federal court petitions on behalf of dozens of immigrants starting Tuesday.

Chris Bentley, a spokesman for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, a division of the Department of Homeland Security, said Tuesday that "to avoid burdening the federal court with these cases," the agency would no longer schedule citizenship interviews until after background checks are complete.

The American-Arab committee said it was disappointed with the procedural change, which would not eliminate delays, but make it impossible for immigrants to fight them.

Bentley said only about 1 percent of naturalization petitions are not ruled on within 120 days. About 450,000 people are naturalized yearly, he said.

Immigration lawyer Ramsey Malkawi said he has about 14 clients facing long delays in their naturalization applications, including some who have waited five or six years.

"This is completely unacceptable," he said. "It's clearly a racial profiling issue."

Dr. Mohammad Attar, an Iraqi immigrant who has lived in the United States since 1991, petitioned for citizenship in November 2004. Six months later, he had an interview with immigration officials — then he waited. He was eventually cleared, but it wasn't until nearly a year after his interview. He was sworn in as a citizen April 14.

"My feeling about it is, it's OK, they can check, but it took too long," said Attar, a neonatologist on the faculty at the University of Michigan. "If they were concerned about something, they could have called, and I could have clarified something."
 
macchupicchu said:
Chris Bentley, a spokesman for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, a division of the Department of Homeland Security, said Tuesday that "to avoid burdening the federal court with these cases," the agency would no longer schedule citizenship interviews until after background checks are complete.

He makes it sound like he is the Superman who is saving the federal courts from those big bad immigrants - "to avoid burdening the federal court with these cases"... How about radically changing something in the way your approach the whole process so that nobody has to burden the federal courts? How about hiring more people to process those name checks? Ever thought about that?
 
macchupicchu said:
The American-Arab committee said it was disappointed with the procedural change, which would not eliminate delays, but make it impossible for immigrants to fight them.

Bentley said only about 1 percent of naturalization petitions are not ruled on within 120 days. About 450,000 people are naturalized yearly, he said.
."

There is no way that only 1% go thru the delay and if it is..this change does not address why it takes years...i could understand a few months delay but years!!! and the spokeman did not clarify what racial group is the majority of this 1%.

Again CIS needs a solution and that should come from the law makers, CIS was given a bad system and they made it worse. After 9/11, everyone wanted to go thru background checks, aganecies to start talking to each other and share info...but no one came up with a good process. Hence, all this unjustified delays and all the problems at hand.
 
This NEW change in USCIS policy is neither to hurt immigrants nor to jeopardize their rights, and of course it has NOTHING to do with profiling as some people always like to claim as such; rather it has to do with preventing lawsuits which are sapping USCIS valuable time/energy/efforts from the tasks they are supposed to do otherwise.

A lot of folks don’t know that USCIS has no control over background checks; rather it’s FBI jurisdiction. So obviously, there is nothing USCIS could do when it comes to background checks. In my opinion, USCIS did right thing when they have changed their policy now about conducting interview only when background checks are completed. This should be the way from the beginning. I mean, why does USCIS get penalized for the mistake/laziness of FBI, and why should USCIS waste all their time/energy/efforts in dealing with all these lawsuits when this is not even their fault if FBI does not clear background check on immigrants on time?

USCIS has been nice enough to have conducted interview on without the completion of background checks to expedite things up but in return they were slapped with lawsuits. Now, I wonder what people would do because they cannot file a lawsuit against USCIS if they will not be interviewed at all.

Since there is no any law in the book wherein people could take force FBI for this, thus they have been taking their frustration on USCIS just because they have a law out there to take USCIS on this.

Nevertheless, Congress and FBI are fully aware of all this blunders of background checks. And FBI has promised to change their ways by the end of this year to expedite things up, but who knows anyway unless we see for a fact. But I strongly believe that FBI should do something in that regard; otherwise it is nonsense for someone to wait for months (or even years) to be cleared.
 
I completely agree with Mr. Cash, USCIS is gaining bad reputation because of the FBI. If you look at any case where there's considerable delay to adjudicate a petition, you will always see that the delay is coming from FBI side. I have know instances where people filed N-400 and got interviewed withing two months, only decision could not be made due to pending security cleareance (FBI Name Check). USCIS has been speeding up things, only they don't have a good partner.

Unfortunately; the only way out is to sue USCIS, I wish one could sue FBI since they are the origin of the problem.
 
loveoklahoma said:
I completely agree with Mr. Cash, USCIS is gaining bad reputation because of the FBI. If you look at any case where there's considerable delay to adjudicate a petition, you will always see that the delay is coming from FBI side. I have know instances where people filed N-400 and got interviewed withing two months, only decision could not be made due to pending security cleareance (FBI Name Check). USCIS has been speeding up things, only they don't have a good partner.

Unfortunately; the only way out is to sue USCIS, I wish one could sue FBI since they are the origin of the problem.

Well, when you bring your car to a repair shop to fix a couple of things, it really doesn't matter how fast the mechanics can do the job if their suppliers don't supply parts fast enough. So, even if it takes the mechanics a couple of days to put everything together but it takes their suppliers a month to deliver the parts, I'm pretty sure it's gonna be the repair shop that will hear all the bitching....
 
uscis is in hot waters again,after a doctor was arrested a few days ago for practising with a suspended license.What does uscis had to do with him? Turns t his name was on the uscis site for doctors authorised for immunisation and bloodtest for 2 years unnoticed ....This went on for 2 years unnoticed.
check this out.He never tested the blood of any clients instead he would take blood from them and dispose it.Thats not all he even passed the tests of patients who had confessed to him that they were hiv infected.
And all the vaccines those poorppl got was pure H2O....


loveoklahoma said:
I completely agree with Mr. Cash, USCIS is gaining bad reputation because of the FBI. If you look at any case where there's considerable delay to adjudicate a petition, you will always see that the delay is coming from FBI side. I have know instances where people filed N-400 and got interviewed withing two months, only decision could not be made due to pending security cleareance (FBI Name Check). USCIS has been speeding up things, only they don't have a good partner.

Unfortunately; the only way out is to sue USCIS, I wish one could sue FBI since they are the origin of the problem.
 
I am very surprised why some people defend the CIS and want to give them a free pass. Yes the FBI mainly causes the delay but who cares...CIS is the agency that handles Naturalization and it is part of the USA govmt (and the Department of Homeland Security) just like the FBI is. I submitted my application to CIS not the FBI. I do not care who is responsible for the delay I just want to have the ability to sue the US Govt. the CIS, FBI etc should have thought about a good process to handle this before they implemented it, they are supposed to be talking with each other and pass info back and forth…Which is not the case. Instead CIS hides behind a bad process and leave us alone trying to track our cases. They even do not care to respond to letters....instead of addressing the real issue they are restoring to bad practices, i.e., sweep the problem under the carpet and leave thousands of immigrants and their families suffer for years.

The pending cases are not filed only against CIS, the list of defendants include the FBI, CIA etc i.e. all the relevant govmt agencies. You are suing the govmt the governmental agencies that can cause the delay. The DOJ does not like to see these kinds of cases and instead of trying to fix the real problem CIS stepped up and volunteered to create another problem at the expense of immigrants

And for racial profiling, it so obvious that they are singling certain people, i.e. Middle Eastern, Arabs, Muslims...Just look at the number of cases filed by this group of people.
 
Top