I just received a RFE for my NIW from Nebraska Center. It is an unusual one, as per my understanding. Please give your comments..
(1)It says the first two criterias of NIW are met, while the 3rd one fails: waiver of laber certification will be contrast to national interest. My petition letter, recommendation letter and evidence addressed 3rd criteria significantly, in fact.
(2)RFE admitted referees speak highly of me, but asks for first-hand documentary about the appraisal of referees: significant contribution, important membership, breakthrough. It also ask for evidence that my research findings have been applied by others. If I had first-hand evidence, I would not need recommendation letter.
(3)RFE doubt the expertise of foreign referees in the availability of researcher in the States, because it is stated in the recommendation letter that my role is irreplacable.
(4)RFE also caught the slips in the application, saying I am submitting "false testimony".
(5) quantity and impact factor of publication
It seems the officer spent quite a lot time in reading my cases carefully and doubt the words in the recommendation letter, even though some of them are from federal and state government. Why they are doing this to me?
Any suggestions or comments appreciated.
Seabird
(1)It says the first two criterias of NIW are met, while the 3rd one fails: waiver of laber certification will be contrast to national interest. My petition letter, recommendation letter and evidence addressed 3rd criteria significantly, in fact.
(2)RFE admitted referees speak highly of me, but asks for first-hand documentary about the appraisal of referees: significant contribution, important membership, breakthrough. It also ask for evidence that my research findings have been applied by others. If I had first-hand evidence, I would not need recommendation letter.
(3)RFE doubt the expertise of foreign referees in the availability of researcher in the States, because it is stated in the recommendation letter that my role is irreplacable.
(4)RFE also caught the slips in the application, saying I am submitting "false testimony".
(5) quantity and impact factor of publication
It seems the officer spent quite a lot time in reading my cases carefully and doubt the words in the recommendation letter, even though some of them are from federal and state government. Why they are doing this to me?
Any suggestions or comments appreciated.
Seabird