Approved!! - Not so peeved any more!!!

peeved

Registered Users (C)
Folks,

My case was approved on 01/13/2006. For those of you who are interested, here are my details:

I'm not from a retrogressed country. I live in CA but my case was filed in VT because my employer is headquartered in MA.

PD = 12/19/2000 (subst.)
I140 RD = 10/01/2002
I140 AD = 08/13/2003
I140 AD = 12/21/2005
(USCIS re-approved I140 after correcting my PD on it. On the first approval they had put my PD as 12/19/2001).

FP1 01/20/2003
FP2 06/22/2004
FP3 01/06/2006

I485 RD = 11/15/2002
I485 ND = 12/05/2002
I485 AD = 01/13/2006
Received approval email on 01/13/2006.
Received approval and biometrics appt. notice on 01/21/2006.

9th year H1 extension RD on 12/18/2006.

FBI Name check email sent in Oct. 2004. I received response from Mr. Hardy in Mar. ‘05 stating that my name check had been pending since Mar. 2003.

FBI FOIPA request sent in Mar. 2005 and received response around Mar. or Apr. 2005.

4 EADs and APs

I tell you, unless one goes through this process, one doesn't realize how tortorous it can be.

I’ve been coming to this site since 2003. I used to visit frequently to see what’s going on. At some point in Mar. 2004 I became a registered user. Around that time I also started visiting this forum daily; often multiple times a day.

Every day I would type a bunch of congratulations to people who posted their approvals here. It was really hard to see approvals for people who had applied way after me. I was happy for them, but I always wondered when my time would come.

At the time I was working for a client where I was extremely unhappy. I was thinking of making my move after getting approved. As unhappy as I was in the client environment, I also knew I could be on that assignment for years and not face unemployment prospects while still going through my I485 process. I was planning on asking my employer to give me to a different assignment or else look for another job once I got my approval. By the end of 2004 the wait had become too painful and I got sick of holding my breath. So I decided to try and put this out of my mind and move on with my life. I didn't frequent this site as much after that. (I felt I'd learnt a lot from this site and I owed posting my approval here. Hence, this long posting.)

There were a few screw-ups and set back in my case: My attorney should have filed me in EB2 but filed in EB3 instead. (I didn’t figure this out until Aug. ‘05. My attorney’s paralegal had convinced me to go with EB3 and I figured she should know what she’s talking about.) Filing in EB3 lowered my adjudication precedence. Also, my I485 was initially received by USCIS on 10/15/2002 but they returned the application to me because my attorney's paralegal had forgotten to enclose the check for processing fee along with my application. At the time it seemed like I lost a month because my adjudication would be delayed by month. Later on things changed so much that it didn't matter.

Towards the end of 2004, Rajiv filed the class action lawsuit against USCIS. I learnt about it after the initial set of names had already been sent with the petition. I really hoped a positive outcome of that case would change things for most of us but unfortunately the judge ruled against us. After that, occasionally I started hearing about people individually filing writs of Mandamus. I often thought about it but feared the repercussions of filing such a writ against a government agency. By the time, I’d already invested over 7 years of my professional life in this country. It was hard to let go of all that time and effort. So I decided to wait and hope for the best. It didn’t happen. Perhaps, I was too naïve.

In May ’05 I asked my employer to reassign me on the grounds that the conditions in my assignment were fast becoming an HR situation. I 485 approved or not, I couldn't take it any longer. In July I was pulled out of that assignment and reassigned to another project in Aug (no bench time).

I had started putting pressure on my attorney through my employer’s immigration dept. I was thinking since they paid the attorney’s fees, they stood a better chance of being heeded. The attorney tried to get things moving through the AILA liaison. Unfortunately, the first time my attorney contacted the AILA liaison, it was around the middle of Jun. ‘05 and within two weeks USCIS was out of VISA numbers and dates retrogressed for everyone. So I had to wait until Oct. My attorney advised me to wait for a few weeks in Oct. to see if anything happens. Nada. Nothing. Zilch. Towards the end of Oct. ’05, under pressure from me, my attorney contacted the AILA liaison again. The AILA liaison got back to us in a few weeks saying that my name was still stuck in FBI name check and that nothing could be done.

I was sick of being in a limbo. I had started feeling like a prisoner. Things got to the point where I didn't care anymore about repercussions. One way or another, I just wanted to move on with my life. I had already been talking to attorney about the possibilities of filing Mandamus since Aug. ‘05. After a negative response from AILA liaison, my attorney was also convinced that it was our only option to get things moving along.

In Dec. 2005 my attorney sent USCIS a notice of intent for filing Mandamus. After which they fixed my I140, sent me another FP notice (though I thought they'd changed their system so finger prints didn't expire any longer and that my FP2 from Jun. 2004 should still have been valid). Within a week of my FP3 they approved my case. I believe USCIS still wouldn't have approved my case had it not been for the notice of intent to file a writ of Mandamus. I'm glad things worked out without actually having to go to court.

Over the last year or so I'd started thinking they probably would never approve my case and I'd started thinking about alternate immigration plans to other countries. I also thought, even if I do get approved, given everything that I’ve gone through, it probably wouldn’t make me too happy. Well, to my surprise, I was wrong on that one. It still made me happy and the relief is immeasurable.

Good luck to all of those who are still waiting. My sincerest support goes to all of you. Hang in there and do not give in and do not give up.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Congratulations

Congratulations Peeved !
Enjoy your much deserved freedom.
Can very well understand your journey. I am still going through it.
Interesting to note that they acted on your notice of intent to file for Manadamus. I guess I will first do that.
 
h1empl said:
Congratulations Peeved !
Enjoy your much deserved freedom.
Can very well understand your journey. I am still going through it.
Interesting to note that they acted on your notice of intent to file for Manadamus. I guess I will first do that.
h1empl,

Thank you very much. I pray yours follows soon.

One thing to remember about filing Mandamus is that you should be able to demonstrate that you made every possible effort to resolve the issue before you went to court. If you can demonstrate that then the judge is sympathetic to you and views your case favorably. Otherwise s/he thinks you're wasting the court's time because you're a lawsuit-happy person who pulled the trigger too soon. You'd probably be asked to try and resolve the issue outside the court before coming back to it.

I had already started collecting ammunition to prove I had made every possible effort before going to court. (USCIS inquiries, FBI name check status requests, FOIPA request etc.) The only thing I didn't try was congressional inquiry because in CA the congressmen do not provide that service due to the huge immigration influx from Mexico and other Latin American countries.

Throughout my dialogue with AILA and USCIS (via my attorney), my mantra was "I want to be reasonable and seek an amicable resolution".

I'm glad I didn't have to go to court. It saved me $5000. My employer paid all my immigration fees and expenses. The company was willing to pay for yearly EADs, APs and H1 renewals. But there is no corporate policy to pay for filing Mandamus. So I was supposed to pay for it. Not wanting to incur that expense was another reason why I put off filing the law suit for as long as I did. But eventually, I realized my freedom is worth far more. That's what really gave me the courage and helped me make up my mind.
 
Congratulaitons Peeved. I had a question though. You say you were filed under EB-3 and PD is PD = 12/19/2000 (subst.)

Does this mean thy ar processing Dec 2000 cases for EB-3 NOW?
Thanks
--Naveen Oshos
 
Your case gives us hope ...

peeved,

I was delighted to read that you have been approved. It seems like your journey was pretty rough. I am currenty going through a similar phase. In my case however, the USCIS messed up badly and transferred it to the wrong local office. Ever since that dreaded mistake my case has been abused. After a year of effort I got the TSC (my service center) to recall my case from the wrong local office but all that mess resulted in lots of delays and now I am stuck in retrogression. I totally understand what you went through because I am going through the same. Right now I am at the stage where I really don't care about this outcome. I have moved beyond that. I am active in this forum, I try to keep up with the latest but I do not obsess about my case anymore. I must admit though that your posting has given me more hope. It makes me feel that someday my day shall also come.

Good luck with your career and make the most of it. You truly deserve the freedom.

regards,

saras76
 
May God Bless You. Thanks for the honest detailed posts.

peeved said:
h1empl,

Thank you very much. I pray yours follows soon.

One thing to remember about filing Mandamus is that you should be able to demonstrate that you made every possible effort to resolve the issue before you went to court. If you can demonstrate that then the judge is sympathetic to you and views your case favorably. Otherwise s/he thinks you're wasting the court's time because you're a lawsuit-happy person who pulled the trigger too soon. You'd probably be asked to try and resolve the issue outside the court before coming back to it.

I had already started collecting ammunition to prove I had made every possible effort before going to court. (USCIS inquiries, FBI name check status requests, FOIPA request etc.) The only thing I didn't try was congressional inquiry because in CA the congressmen do not provide that service due to the huge immigration influx from Mexico and other Latin American countries.

Throughout my dialogue with AILA and USCIS (via my attorney), my mantra was "I want to be reasonable and seek an amicable resolution".

I'm glad I didn't have to go to court. It saved me $5000. My employer paid all my immigration fees and expenses. The company was willing to pay for yearly EADs, APs and H1 renewals. But there is no corporate policy to pay for filing Mandamus. So I was supposed to pay for it. Not wanting to incur that expense was another reason why I put off filing the law suit for as long as I did. But eventually, I realized my freedom is worth far more. That's what really gave me the courage and helped me make up my mind.
 
noshs said:
Congratulaitons Peeved. I had a question though. You say you were filed under EB-3 and PD is PD = 12/19/2000 (subst.)

Does this mean thy ar processing Dec 2000 cases for EB-3 NOW?
Thanks
--Naveen Oshos

Naveen Oshos,

Thank you very much!

I do not know if they are processing the Dec. 2000 cases now. (Who knows what USCIS is doing any way? I don't think even their managers know what they are doing.)

I believe my case was adjudicated because my attorney sent a notice of intent to file a suit of Mandamus to the USCIS VSC's attorney. (Yes apparently, VSC has an attorney of its own). This was done so that in case we went to court, we could show the judge we tried to resolve the issue outside the court and that we're asking the judge to intercede only as a last resort. Judges like it if you convince them you tried not to waste their time. :rolleyes: (For some more info. on Mandamus strategy please see me response to h1empl in the same thread).

I wish I could give you a definitive answer, but I do not have one.

Good luck and God speed.
 
saras76 said:
peeved,

I was delighted to read that you have been approved. It seems like your journey was pretty rough. I am currenty going through a similar phase. In my case however, the USCIS messed up badly and transferred it to the wrong local office. Ever since that dreaded mistake my case has been abused. After a year of effort I got the TSC (my service center) to recall my case from the wrong local office but all that mess resulted in lots of delays and now I am stuck in retrogression. I totally understand what you went through because I am going through the same. Right now I am at the stage where I really don't care about this outcome. I have moved beyond that. I am active in this forum, I try to keep up with the latest but I do not obsess about my case anymore. I must admit though that your posting has given me more hope. It makes me feel that someday my day shall also come.

Good luck with your career and make the most of it. You truly deserve the freedom.

regards,

saras76

Saras76,

Thank you very much. My heart truly goes out to you and all those who've suffered because of the incompetent bureaucracy. I know what it can do to one's morale. I totally agree with your approach to coping with the situation. Doing something similar helped me cope with things.

I've learnt that one can upgrade their EB category from 3 to 2 based on work experience acquired. I would suggest to explore that possibility and if feasable to go that route as soon as you become eligible. It may really help with the retrogression.

Whenever your date becomes current, if USCIS takes unreasonably, do file a lawsuit against them. I believe, most of the USCIS adjudicators have a clerical mentality. They do not care. If your file is sitting somewhere gathering dust, the only way to force them fish it out and take a look at it may be to file a law suit.

Good luck and God speed.
 
CONGRATULATIONS!!!

I am also stuck in name check since 2003. Your case atleast gives me something to think about. Enjoy the GREEN
 
VSC attorney

>I had already started collecting ammunition to prove I had made every possible >effort before going to court. (USCIS inquiries, FBI name check status requests, >FOIPA request etc.) The only thing I didn't try was congressional inquiry >because in CA the congressmen do not provide that service due to the huge >immigration influx from Mexico and other Latin American countries.

peeved,
Appreciate your replies.
I am very much in the same situation. I did several USCIS enquiries, myself and through congressman. Did FBI inquiry and FOIPA and the reply was standard after 8 months. Congressman also recently wrote to FBI Asst director. No progress. Congressman made enquiries at USCIS on my behalf and received the same standard reply - security checks not complete cannot promise when it will be done.
In my wife's case - FBI replied the name check is completed. USCIS says name check not complete.

Can you provide the VSC Attorney's name and address where you sent the notice ?

Thanks
 
expected said:
CONGRATULATIONS!!!

I am also stuck in name check since 2003. Your case atleast gives me something to think about. Enjoy the GREEN

expected,

Thank you very much.

Work permitting, within the next few days I plan on posting some tips in a new thread on how to expedite name check if one's PD is current. Please stay tuned.

Hope you get your approval soon.
 
h1empl said:
>
peeved,
Appreciate your replies.
I am very much in the same situation. I did several USCIS enquiries, myself and through congressman. Did FBI inquiry and FOIPA and the reply was standard after 8 months. Congressman also recently wrote to FBI Asst director. No progress. Congressman made enquiries at USCIS on my behalf and received the same standard reply - security checks not complete cannot promise when it will be done.
In my wife's case - FBI replied the name check is completed. USCIS says name check not complete.

Can you provide the VSC Attorney's name and address where you sent the notice ?

Thanks

h1empl,

Unfortunately, I do not have that information. My attorney corresponded with VSC's attorney on my behalf.

When I asked for copies of emails etc. I was told I could get only print outs of the emails with the names and address of the AILA liaison and the VSC attorney blacked out. This information, I was told, is confidential. The confidentiality, I believe, is stipulated by AILA. Quite understandably, AILA wants to protect this information so we'll keep needing attorneys and paying them, and AILA will keep having it's members paying the subscriptions.

Sorry, couldn't be of more help here.
 
I485 Withdrawl and File a new one for spouse

First my heartiest congratulations to Peeved in his success of obtaining a GC. Long awaited journey but every effort worth it.

I have the following question for Saras and Peeved and other veterans of the fourm.

My spouse does not want to wait any longer for the GC process since we are stuck in retrogression and thus wants to file a separate 485 using a substitute labor. In this case does she need to withdraw her dpependent 485 which was filed with me when I had filed the 485 and included spouse in the application? Right now I am in my 7th year of H1 and both are working in our respective EADs.Will withdrawing spouse's name from the 485 delay my adjudication of the application or will effect either in denial or in any other shape or form towards my application.
Please help as I am thinking to talk to my attorney in withdrawing spouse's application
Please Advice
Thanks
Khadash

EB3-India
PD 10/16/2002 AD 8/12/2004 (Own Labor)
I140 RD 8/16/2004 ND 8/16/2004 AD 10/6/2004
I485 RD 10/2/2004 ND 10/6/2004 AD Awaiting
First FP 2/25/2005 LUD 03/7/2005
 
Congrats!

Peeved, you deserve a double congrats, and the long waiting period of 9 years!
Wish you all the best with GC
----------
EB2-NIW VSC
I-140, I485 RD 10/26/2005
I140 AD 1/11/2006
I485 AD--?
 
khadash said:
First my heartiest congratulations to Peeved in his success of obtaining a GC. Long awaited journey but every effort worth it.

I have the following question for Saras and Peeved and other veterans of the fourm.

My spouse does not want to wait any longer for the GC process since we are stuck in retrogression and thus wants to file a separate 485 using a substitute labor. In this case does she need to withdraw her dpependent 485 which was filed with me when I had filed the 485 and included spouse in the application? Right now I am in my 7th year of H1 and both are working in our respective EADs.Will withdrawing spouse's name from the 485 delay my adjudication of the application or will effect either in denial or in any other shape or form towards my application.
Please help as I am thinking to talk to my attorney in withdrawing spouse's application
Please Advice
Thanks
Khadash

Khadash,

Thank you very much. For your particular situation, I would suggest to seek legal advice, perhaps from multiple attorneys. I can offer my opinion, but that's all it will be. I am not a legal expert. Through out my journey, I researched and learnt a few things, but they are all specific to my situation. I am afraid, if I open my mouth on your situation, I can probably do more damage than good.

One thing that you did not make clear in your question: does the substitute labor that your wife want to use have a current priority date? If it does, than perhaps it is really worth considering. In fact, perhaps, you too can apply as a dependent with your wife?

The other thing I would consider is the stability of your wife's job and the integrity of the employer. I've read about quite a few scandals here how the employers lure people with substitute labors, and then withdraw the I-140 and the underlying labors for one reason or another, especially if the employee leaves or is laid off after more than 6 months after approval of I-140. Then they reuse those labors for applying another I-140 for someone else. So if your wife's job is steady and secure with long term stability and her employer has ethical integrity, then perhaps that would be another positive factor to consier.

Lastly, your question would be visible to more experts if you started your own thread. People might over look it here in my thread thinking it's only about my approval experience.

Good luck and God speed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
merovingian, Baski555, GaramChai2go, good_y

Thank you very much.

Hope you all get your approvals soon.
 
Top