AILA finally confirms and comments before breakfast.

PrinceofJungle

New Member
----------------------- Source Info start ------------------------
http://www.immigration-law.com/Canada.html

"10/21/2005: AILA Confirms Following Details of Senate Judiciary
Approvals Yesterday

According to the AILA, AILA has passed the following immigration
proposals yesterday:

Impose a new $500 fee on immigrant visa petitions for the EB-1, EB-2,
and EB-3 categories.​
Recapture unused employment-based visas from prior years for
immediate allocation of up to 90,000/year. (Estimates indicate there
are only 90,000-100,000 unused numbers to be tapped.)
Exempt spouses and minor children from counting against the annual
cap on employment-based immigrant visas. (Estimates are that this
would lead to an annual increase of 80,000-90,000 employment-based
immigrant visas.)​

Allow individuals to apply for adjustment of status before an
immigrant visa is deemed currently available. (Of course, approval
could not occur until the visa number is available.)​

Recapture approximately 300,000 unused H-1B numbers dating back to FY
1991. As a result of Senator Feinstein's amendment, 30,000 rather
than 60,000 would be available annually. (In other words, effectively
raising the cap from 65,000 to 95,000 for at least 10 years.)​
Impose a new fee on the recaptured H-1B visas so that the fees on the
original 65,000 H-1B allotment remain unchanged but the additional
30,000 available annually carry an additional $500 fee.​
Impose a new $750 fee on L-1 visas. (This was part of Senator
Feinstein's amendment and was necessary to offset the reduction in
revenue resulting from the limitation on recaptured H-1B numbers from
60,000 to 30,000.)​


We agree with the AILA that these are not final bills and we have a
long way to go to make these proposals into a reality. Businesses,
academic institutions, and other stakeholders should keep working
with their Congressional representatives to support the Senate
Judiciary bill.


------------------------- Source Info End -------------------------------

Good Luck
 
PrinceofJungle said:
----------------------- Source Info start ------------------------
http://www.immigration-law.com/Canada.html

"10/21/2005: AILA Confirms Following Details of Senate Judiciary
Approvals Yesterday

According to the AILA, AILA has passed the following immigration
proposals yesterday:

Impose a new $500 fee on immigrant visa petitions for the EB-1, EB-2,
and EB-3 categories.​
Ref# 1
Recapture unused employment-based visas from prior years for
immediate allocation of up to 90,000/year. (Estimates indicate there
are only 90,000-100,000 unused numbers to be tapped.)
Ref# 2 (and below)
Exempt spouses and minor children from counting against the annual
cap on employment-based immigrant visas. (Estimates are that this
would lead to an annual increase of 80,000-90,000 employment-based
immigrant visas.)​

Allow individuals to apply for adjustment of status before an
immigrant visa is deemed currently available. (Of course, approval
could not occur until the visa number is available.)​

Recapture approximately 300,000 unused H-1B numbers dating back to FY
1991. As a result of Senator Feinstein's amendment, 30,000 rather
than 60,000 would be available annually. (In other words, effectively
raising the cap from 65,000 to 95,000 for at least 10 years.)​
Impose a new fee on the recaptured H-1B visas so that the fees on the
original 65,000 H-1B allotment remain unchanged but the additional
30,000 available annually carry an additional $500 fee.​
Impose a new $750 fee on L-1 visas. (This was part of Senator
Feinstein's amendment and was necessary to offset the reduction in
revenue resulting from the limitation on recaptured H-1B numbers from
60,000 to 30,000.)​


We agree with the AILA that these are not final bills and we have a
long way to go to make these proposals into a reality. Businesses,
academic institutions, and other stakeholders should keep working
with their Congressional representatives to support the Senate
Judiciary bill.


------------------------- Source Info End -------------------------------

Good Luck
Ref #1: Very much POSSIBLE
Ref #2: Expect 'DELAY' for next 5-15 years.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
why do expect delay of Ref# 2 is 5 to 15 years.

If Ref#2 is not approved...Priority dates will never move ..90K visa numbers will last not more than 3 months,

I think Ref#2 is more Important than ref#1... being Ref#2 will release 80K visa numbers even in the current year quota...
 
dbwr said:
why do expect delay of Ref# 2 is 5 to 15 years.

If Ref#2 is not approved...Priority dates will never move ..90K visa numbers will last not more than 3 months,

I think Ref#2 is more Important than ref#1... being Ref#2 will release 80K visa numbers even in the current year quota...
DOS/USCIS is cooking something? what? only delay the cases. Money is always welcomed..
 
Top