KGY said:Sorry to post it here, don't know where is the best place.
I am planning to visit India after 6 years, wanted to know if anyone travelled through Luftahnsa? Does it required a transit visa, or my advance payroll will be fine.
shesharo12 said:If you fly by Lufthansa to India, you dont need advance parole.
poongunranar said:First of all, Advance Parole is not a visa. It is a substitute for a visa. It just says that one person has been "paroled" into the US just because he or she doesn't have a visa, but has a valid status. However, due to the vagaries of this document, many airlines and countries do not recognize them as a valid visa for bypassing the requirment for a transit visa.
Hence, if you are traveling by Delta, you need to get a French transit visa for CDG and if you are transiting at FRA by Lufthansa, you need to get the German transit visa and the same for KLM in AMS.
There are always exceptions where certain people may have been lucky to not have a transit visa with their AP. But, it is advisable to not take the risk.
The same is valid for anybody who doesn't have a plastic card, but just a temporary I-551 stamp.
Singapore (SIN) and Malaysia (KUL) airports are just fine. You will get a transit visa to go around the city on landing there. It is free of cost. However, Singapore Airlines on the east-coast transits at two points: either AMS (Netherlands) or FRA (Germany). Consult Singapore Airlines regarding any updated requirements. Malaysian Airlines on the east-coast transits at DXB (Dubai) at the United Arab Emirates. UAE doesn't require transit visas, but they have concern when you fly from KUL ---> EWR. Carry a copy of your AP and that should just be fine.
Hope this helps.
Your premise is dead wrong. Irrespective of whether you leave the airport or wish to stay "within" the flight, you ought to have transit visas for certain countries. You do not determine that, rather, that transiting country mandates that. That's how unfortunately it is. Even I was always bemused about this shanty requirement until I had the "pleasure" of transiting in France. Even if you are flying in the same flight, you ought to get out, they will take a long tour around the airport in a bus and then will drop you at the main terminal. Depending upon whether you are connecting at certain terminals, you will be asked for the transit visa. Else, you will have to undergo security check and again a very long bus ride to come back to the same flight you had flown in for your onward journey. How insipid it can get? Well, welcome to the 21st century of Rube Goldberg travel.SAMBOCICO said:Why would some one need a transit visa if he is going change terminals or conect to a flight within the same airport? I think you guyies are confused.
You would need a transit visa only if you have to leave the airport.
poongunranar said:Your premise is dead wrong. Irrespective of whether you leave the airport or wish to stay "within" the flight, you ought to have transit visas for certain countries. You do not determine that, rather, that transiting country mandates that. That's how unfortunately it is. Even I was always bemused about this shanty requirement until I had the "pleasure" of transiting in France. Even if you are flying in the same flight, you ought to get out, they will take a long tour around the airport in a bus and then will drop you at the main terminal. Depending upon whether you are connecting at certain terminals, you will be asked for the transit visa. Else, you will have to undergo security check and again a very long bus ride to come back to the same flight you had flown in for your onward journey. How insipid it can get? Well, welcome to the 21st century of Rube Goldberg travel.
You need transit visa and it is the mandate of the transiting country, irrespective of the preference of the traveler to either disembark the aircraft or not.