Action Time

C

checkthisout

Registered Users (C)
Why don't we send our petition to this Aguilar Director of BCIS. In my view we all should go to VSC office and request for appointment with the Director. Atleast let start doing really action or we will here forever.
 
That is good idea. It now leads to the question of who is to bell the cat. This thing might just work. We just need volunteers close to the Vermont region. 5-6 should suffice and they can have a petition from us all.
 
Already emails and petition has been sent.

But there has been no follow-up or response.
 
I mine email wont be enough. We might have to put our petition on frontpage of Newspaper we all can chip in plus we all have to visit vermont and ask for the appointment with the director. We have to show your petition to the media. Why we are suffer for doing nothing. We should increase our voice.

Please lets fights.


Even god wont help if you don't do anything.

Lets do something.

I am really frustated with this GC process it is already more than 4years from LC to 485
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Divide everyone depending on their state of leaving, and everyone should visit togthere and mee their congressman and senators.
 
people:

We are all in the battle too looong, many weak appealings won't make the voice louder, the past already proved that. It is the time for us to come together and work out a solution. This solution must be a strong one, and unique, one punch for all.

I have an idea:

Let's hire a lawyer to sue the service center, everyone pay $50, meanwhile let the lawyer post an appealing ad on major news paper for the action, or contact some human right groups and contact senator or congressman. the web hosting law office will be a good option, because we all have benefited from them.
 
Originally posted by checkthisout
Why don't we send our petition to this Aguilar Director of BCIS. In my view we all should go to VSC office and request for appointment with the Director. Atleast let start doing really action or we will here forever.
Click to expand...
Hi, checkthisout,
The BCIS top management including him looks coward and stupid, so I think it is useless.

At first, as I wrote at another thread:

I encourage everyone to send the petition to your three local Congressional offices phisically such as Fax or USPS Mail.
As Edition already mentioned,
The Honorable Senators and The Honorable House of Representatives give high priority to the messages received from the constituents of their state or district.
You should receive written letters from Congressional members within a month.

We have to have at least one Congressional member to introduce a bill and several ones for co-sponsers to amend the INA.
-kashmir
 
If you have been following the petition threads created by Cinta, Edison, Sai and others, all ideas raised here have been discussed extensively. Law suit is once of our last options.

We have submitted the petition to the immigration ombudsman and we have been forwarding the petition to the congress to George Bush, our local congress members and the media. We’ll send a reminder to the ombudsman in a few days with updated signature list.

Sending the petition to CIS director Eduardo Aguirre may not have added benefit to what we have been doing. But it will not hurt if we do. To talk to him in person may require a big effort from our side. By the way, does CIS director (not the VSC director) reside in Vermont? Should not he be Washington D.C. (I am not sure).

For everyone’s reference, here is a petition for refugees (3 pages petition, 10 pages signature)


http://www.refugeesusa.org/who/govt/SignOnDHS-RCUSA.pdf




Originally posted by checkthisout
Why don't we send our petition to this Aguilar Director of BCIS. In my view we all should go to VSC office and request for appointment with the Director. Atleast let start doing really action or we will here forever.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: Re: Action Time

Originally posted by kashmir
Hi, checkthisout,
The BCIS top management including him looks coward and stupid, so I think it is useless.
...
Click to expand...
Originally posted at CSC forum:

http://www.immigration.gov/graphics/AguirreMPI090303.pdf
Eduardo Aguire
Director
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Prepared Rmarks (Note: Director May Deviate)
Migration Policy Institute
September 3, 2003

...

... CIS cannot afford to have employees frozen by the fear of making a mistake. Finding solutions to the many challenges we face will require calculated, well-informed risk taking.

...

- USCIS -

He was not only coward and stupid but also a liar.
 
http://www.aila.org/contentViewer.aspx?bc=268

Will it be an idea if we ask the help from AILA?:confused:

All we want is fairness! People like us around this time period encounter the slowest processing speed from LCA to I140 to I485. It's good BCIS want to improve their service, but they should practice it with a rational way.
 
Re: Re: Re: Action Time

I thought he was referring the "zero tolerance policy". Now it's withdrawn.

Why do you say he is a liar?


Originally posted by kashmir


... CIS cannot afford to have employees frozen by the fear of making a mistake. Finding solutions to the many challenges we face will require calculated, well-informed risk taking.

- USCIS -

He was not only coward and stupid but also a liar.
Click to expand...
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Action Time

Originally posted by YJay
I thought he was referring the "zero tolerance policy". Now it's withdrawn.

Why do you say he is a liar?
Click to expand...
Eduardo Aguire said "CIS cannot afford to have employees frozen by the fear of making a mistake." on 9/3/2003.

The memo was written by James W. Ziglar on 3/22/2002.
For 18 months, the legacy INS and the USCIS had had the Zero Tolerance Policy.
At least for a couple of months since Eduardo Aguire became the Director of BCIS, his employees had been frozen by the fear of making a mistake.
 
Kashmira and all,


I already know that we have mailed/fax petition to senators/Congressman. I was talking about we should physically meet with this senators and have face to face meetings.

This will help in a way if he see 30 or 40 apporaching at same time and want to discuss this matter personally. He cann't say no to this 30 or 40 people this is the rule of politics. YOU cannot deny a group that is the main and the most rule of politics.
 
Originally posted by checkthisout
Kashmira and all,

I already know that we have mailed/fax petition to senators/Congressman. I was talking about we should physically meet with this senators and have face to face meetings.

This will help in a way if he see 30 or 40 apporaching at same time and want to discuss this matter personally. He cann't say no to this 30 or 40 people this is the rule of politics. YOU cannot deny a group that is the main and the most rule of politics.
Click to expand...
Hi, checkthisout,
Of course, our next target is face to face meetings
because a bill must be introduced.

Before that, I'd like to confirm the NUMBER, (30 or 40 you said).
I don't count people who can not even send the petition directly to Congressinal offices physically.

I am working in California.
http://www.immigrationportal.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=594550#post594550
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top