V vidy5300 Registered Users (C) Sep 30, 2003 #1 Hello everyone, I ran the macro for 03-008 and found that a case was approved yesterday. It is nice to see approvals. The details of the case are as follows ND 10/10/2002 AD 09/29/2003
Hello everyone, I ran the macro for 03-008 and found that a case was approved yesterday. It is nice to see approvals. The details of the case are as follows ND 10/10/2002 AD 09/29/2003
M moja Registered Users (C) Sep 30, 2003 #2 Just Wondering: Is this a 485 case or something else. If so, how come a case dated 10/2002 being approved before cases in 2001 or jan-oct 2002. 03/2002 Filer
Just Wondering: Is this a 485 case or something else. If so, how come a case dated 10/2002 being approved before cases in 2001 or jan-oct 2002. 03/2002 Filer
V vidy5300 Registered Users (C) Sep 30, 2003 #3 yes it is a 485 case Yes it is a 485 case.... and also employment based 030085xxxx........ TSC is always random so this is another random theory
yes it is a 485 case Yes it is a 485 case.... and also employment based 030085xxxx........ TSC is always random so this is another random theory
M moja Registered Users (C) Sep 30, 2003 #4 Thanks vidy So there is no point of even tracking the processing dates
V vidy5300 Registered Users (C) Oct 1, 2003 #6 read it in the news group dinnu, I think i read it in quite a few places that if the sixth number after SRC is '5' it is employment based....... so I concluded from SRC030085xxxx that is it employment based.... here is one of the thread that i read from http://groups.msn.com/texasimmigrat...essage=21772&LastModified=4675440042154876237 vidy
read it in the news group dinnu, I think i read it in quite a few places that if the sixth number after SRC is '5' it is employment based....... so I concluded from SRC030085xxxx that is it employment based.... here is one of the thread that i read from http://groups.msn.com/texasimmigrat...essage=21772&LastModified=4675440042154876237 vidy
D dinnu Registered Users (C) Oct 1, 2003 #7 It is not correct vidy5300, It is not correct. Please read my post in the following thread for a detailed explanation. http://boards.immigrationportal.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=97246
It is not correct vidy5300, It is not correct. Please read my post in the following thread for a detailed explanation. http://boards.immigrationportal.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=97246
V vidy5300 Registered Users (C) Oct 1, 2003 #8 thank u dinnu dinnu, Thank you.. i was under the impression that 5 is for employment based.... thanks for the correction...... vidy
thank u dinnu dinnu, Thank you.. i was under the impression that 5 is for employment based.... thanks for the correction...... vidy