911 Decapitation Operation in Pasadena against ZHANG Hongbao, who is a China’s outstanding political leader and met with disaster in Pasadena
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Major consolidated report《The Decapitation Operation below the Rocky Mountain》Part I
“911 Decapitation Operation” was miserably defeated; ZHANG Hongbao won
three rounds out of three in the United States in the fight against persecution
------- A belated true account of the close of the criminal court case of
HE Nanfang vs. ZHANG Hongbao
Capitol Hill independent writer Fredric Wilson
Reported by Capitol Hill independent writer Fredric Wilson from Pasadena on March 15.
Today is the third anniversary of the false frame-up of ZHANG Hongbao after he settled down in Pasadena. Two weeks ago, which was February 28, the criminal court of the Los Angeles Superior Court in Pasadena rendered a final probation and sentence hearing on the five felonies of “kidnapping”, “assault with a deadly weapon”, “false imprisonment”, “dissuading a witness from report”, and “making criminal threat” that HE Nanfang had filed against ZHANG Hong-Ba. [sic] The final judgment is that all of the five felonies [charges] were dismissed; the US$ 150,000 “medical expenses” restitution and the imprisonment of ZHANG Hongbao for at least ten years demanded by the prosecution and HE Nanfang were denied. Even the agreement for payment of US$ 1,000 court costs by ZHANG Hongbao was cancelled. Nevertheless, the previous stay away orders that bar ZHANG Hongbao from getting near HE Nanfang remains in full force and effect. As such, the curtain comes down on this time consuming criminal case, which called for forty hearings and lasted three years, with ZHANG Hongbao winning the case.
This writer, being an eyewitness at the court trial on February 28, should have issued this article immediately. However, because the court trial termination documents were done only on March 3, and it took time to obtain the original documents for review and to translate the court trial documents and this article from Chinese to English and vice versa, this writer did not want to issue this article hastily. By doing so, this big case, which has caused a huge stir in the media in China mainland, the United States, and even around the world, can be reported prudently; at the same time a strong counter-strike can be launched against the twisted reports of the media, such as “The China Press” and the Justice Party, that are utilized by the Chinese Communist. In any case, this is a belated report; this writer can only make up for the blemish of lateness with a detailed true account of the court trial.
I. Inside and outside the court room
The case against ZHANG Hongbao, which contained five felony counts, was heard for the 40th time at the Los Angeles Superior Court North West District (Pasadena Court) Criminal Court H, at 8:30 a.m. on February 28. On ZHANG Hongbao’s side, only he himself and his attorney appeared in court. On HE Nanfang’s side, a team of twenty some people showed up. The team included four prosecutors (this was something that had never happened before; usually, only one prosecutor on the case would appear in court), reporters from The China Press which is a mouthpiece of the Chinese Communist, JI Xiaofeng who has been accused to be a Chinese Communist spy on the internet, WANG Chi, who has close ties with the Chinese Consulate and claims to be a member of HE Nanfang’s defense team, a crowd of reporters who have been invited to come by the Chinese Communist (this crowd of reporters apparently had received prior notice about the final battle on this date; before this, the reporters, with the exception of the reporters of The China Press, had not shown up for twenty some hearings), people who were organized to come to watch and to cheer them on, and HE Nanfang’s civil case attorney. HE Nanfang herself held two big boards each of which measured one square meter. It appeared that the people on the side of HE Nanfang came prepared and ready for an all out fight in a decisive battle.
ZHANG Hongbao was still wearing the smart-looking dark blue suite that fitted him very well, a dark blue neck tie that made him look serene, profound, dignified, and confident; his rosy complexion made him appear a lot younger than his actual age. HE Nanfang, on the other hand, stuck closely with WANG Chi each step of the way; she wore a light brown overcoat with a long scarf wrapped around her neck; her shoulder length hair made her stout stature look even shorter; her face is wax yellow and haggard; she appeared nervous and uneasy. WANG Chi constantly gave her some instructions, and HE Nanfang constantly nodded her head uncomfortably. Because all of her hair was combed backward, a one-inch long knife scar was appeared slightly above HE Nanfang’s eyebrows. It has been reported that the knife scar was the result of her fight with someone in the past.
The atmosphere in court was somewhat different. ZHANG Hongbao seemed to feel it. After his lawyer Mark Geragos arrived at court, ZHANG immediately asked him to go outside the court to tell him his own views and requests. ZHANG clearly told his lawyer: If the other side did not heed the judge’s idea of a compromise and was adamant on adding unreasonable requests and created troubles, then we would fight from the very begining, from the five felonies all the way to the jury. The US$ 96,000 medical expenses demanded by the other side were a fabrication; we must not bear even one penny of that amount!
Sure enough, the prosecutor made a request for a verdict today to the court. The judge granted the request and ordered court hearing to begin at 1:30 in the afternoon with the judgment to be made after the hearing.
Court hearing began in the afternoon. Instead of the usual apparel, ZHANG Hongbao wore a royal blue leather jacket; he did not wear a neck tie; although he looked casual, he did not lose the seriousness for court appearance; he held a heavy folder in his hands, which displayed an attitude of being ready for battle. ZHANG Hong-Bao sat next to the reporter from The China Press, opened the folder, took out a tape, and told the reporter of The China Press: It was a voice recording of JI Xiaofeng telling another person to demand from ZHANG Hongbao a list of the 38,000,000 Zhong Gong members and information of all of the assets of Zhong Gong; the recording, which was given to him by a friend of his, would show the spy identity of JI Xiaofeng. In a while, he would give the tape to the court as evidence to let the judge to understand what kind of people were involved in the case so that the judge would have a better understanding of the background of the case. After a while, the reporter of The China Press left. Moments later, JI Xiaofeng disappeared and, to the end, was never seen again.
The hearing began. Mark Geragos, ZHANG Hongbao’s lawyer, presented his case to the court first. He mentioned only two points. First, the medical records in the court file showed that: When HE Nanfang examined at the Arcadia Hospital for the first time, the doctor has said that he did not see any bruise or swelling. After a customary examination, the doctor was of the opinion that hospitalization for observation was not necessary and HE Nanfang was sent home without even a prescription. The pictures produced by HE Nanfang showing black and purple bruises were taken several days later by someone that HE Nanfang had asked. Second, there were several discrepancies in HE Nanfang’s testimonies. Mark Geragos simply spoke three sentences on these two points. Although few words were spoken, they were clear, concise, to the point, and very persuasive. The Arcadia Hospital is a famous church hospital in Los Angeles; its practice of medicine is meticulous and its diagnoses are authoritative. If anyone who goes to the hospital for external injuries is considered to need treatment, he would be required to be hospitalized for several days for observation; during hospitalization, he would undergo complete physical examination several times and treatment would be given; he would be released by the doctor only when he is fit to go. The answer would be very obvious if there was no hospitalization, no prescription, and the authoritative diagnosis was “no bruise or swelling observed”. It is also a strong rebuttal to HE Nanfang’s claim of “serious loss of work capacity” when she demands a restitution of 20,000,000 dollars. Whether HE Nanfang’s bumps and bruises were caused herself or someone else was no longer important to the judge who was trying the case. The judge’s eyes showed approval. Mark brought up the second point very skillfully and artfully; he did not say that HE Nanfang lied, deceived the judge, or scorned the court; he just said that were “several discrepancies” in her testimonies. There could only be one account of one fact. What does it tell you when different accounts are given in different situations at different times? The judge must have felt that too after she read the records. Mark led everyone in court to find HE Nanfang’s word unacceptable. Mark lived up to his reputation as a top criminal defense lawyer in the United States; ZHANG Hongbao picked the right person.
Next, prosecutor Susan Schwarts countered. First, she held up HE Nanfang’s two big one square meter photos and showed them to the court. Each of the photos showed bruises. Putting aside the issue of how they were made, these big photographs were truly quite impressive. They could easily evoke sympathy for the “victim” and anger toward the aggressor. The propaganda effect is quite effective. The prosecutor said that: When a person is injured, bruises and bumps do not necessarily appear right away. Sometimes, they would show up only after a few days. When such words were uttered, the audience was aroused. Was that because the rebuttal effective? No! It was because the prosecutor spoke words of ignorance; particularly, the words came from a criminal prosecutor! Clinical experiments in the fields of injury medicine and combat sport medicine have proved that the head and the face are the areas where the human skin is the most fragile; when impacted by a strong force, the head would immediately develop a bump and black and purple bruises would immediately show up on the face; the sport of boxing provide the best proof for that. No one athlete would get a bruised nose, a swollen face, and a black eye only days after being punched; instead, the results would be visible immediately at the time of the boxing game. On the other hand, black and purple bruises could appear gradually in other parts of the body two to three days later due to the different levels of impacts inflicted. Judges and prosecutors who work on criminal cases should know this professional clinical knowledge in the areas of injury medicine and combat sport medicine. The unprofessional remarks of the prosecutor caused everyone in court to examine closely the two big photographs. The amazing thing was that: One of the big pictures happened to show a deep bruise about the size of a chicken egg at the corner of HE Nanfang’s eye. How big was the force that caused such a result? With infliction of such a big force, how could “no bruise or swelling” have been found by the authoritative hospital when she was examined at the hospital eight hours later? People could not help questioning the truthfulness of the photograph. HE Nanfang does not know computer technology; then, who helped her fabricate it?
In any case, the judge was still very fair; she gave HE Nanfang the opportunity to testify, which let her recount what had happened. This time, she no longer cried or showed extreme sadness; neither was she emotional and confusing with what she was saying. Instead, she smiled first and then spoke eloquently; however, her smile was too fake and the two ends of her mouth pulled up unnaturally, which made everyone feel very uneasy. HE Nanfang might have realized that, so, twice she adjusted the upward movement of the ends of her mouth. However, such actions brought adverse results; they gave people an unexplainable feeling that she was an awful actress. In any case, HE Nanfang’s speech was calm and very slow, word by word. Apparently, she had been professionally coached over and over again; she was virtually like YAN Qingxin when she was putting on the deceitful performance. Just as she had recited to the media each time, HE Nanfang again recounted how she was kidnapped and physically assaulted by ZHANG Hongbao, and then she added something new; she testified to the judge that: “Last night, ZHANG Hongbao was still threatening her.” [sic] Those present in the court murmured when they heard it: Was that possible? HE Nanfang continued by mimicking YAN Qingxin’s performance: “ZHANG Hongbao said to me beside the swimming pool, ‘I am going to kick you into the pool!’” HE Nanfang said, “Master, wouldn’t that lead to death?” “ZHANG Hongbao said, ‘Who knows!’!” [sic] …
When the judge heard that, she abruptly asked HE Nanfang, “Did this happen on the day of the incident?” HE Nanfang, who was immersed in the state of story telling, was confused by the abrupt questioning of the judge; she did not know how to respond at that instant. After a moment of silence, she said, “Not on that day. It was around the New Year!” Then, the judge asked again, “Specifically, on which day? Was someone else present?” HE Nanfang falteringly said, “In any case, it was New Year’s time; it was around the Chinese New Year. No one else was around.” The judge showed impatience with the added piece of news, the inconsistencies, and the uncorroborated “testimonies” that she liked to give; the judge stopped HE Nanfang from talking further. She directly asked her, “What are you demanding?” This time, HE Nanfang replied without thinking, “The medical expenses that I have provided to the court came to 96,000 dollars. There were other expenses that have not been produced. The total was 150,000 dollars. I demand ZHANG Hongbao to pay for them. ZHANG Hongbao is still threatening the lives of my family members. I want the court to continue the restraining order and prohibit him from getting near me or interfering with me through the internet, the media, the telephone, or the email.” The judge immediately asked HE Nanfang, “How many years would you want?” HE Nan-Fang said, “Ten years.” At this point, Scandura, HE Nan-Fang’s civil case laywer, walked past the bar and said to the judge, “ZHANG Hongbao has also threatened the lives of my office staff and mine. We also want the court to issue a restraining order barring ZHANG Hongbao from getting near us.” When the judge heard that, she said plainly to Scandura, “You are in danger? You report it to the police!” Scandura was very embarrassed, but he still wanted to talk. The judge motioned for him to stop; he stepped back humiliated.
The untimely appearance of Scandura made people recall what happened about two years ago in the criminal court during ZHANG Hongbao’s criminal case. As the civil case lawyer of HE Nanfang, Scandura went past the gallery and unrestrainedly pointed his fingers and waved his limbs. With a series of machine-gun berates, Mark Geragos, who was firmly seated in the criminal lawyer’s seat, accused him of violating the rules of the criminal court and asked the judge to expel him. That led to Scandura’s being expelled from the criminal court in shame. For two years, Scandura had not appeared in criminal court again. Unexpectedly, he appeared in court again today. It seems that Scandura has not learned his lesson; he is really not sufficiently mature or well composed. One could not help but worry for HE Nan-Fang for entrusting him with the great task of handling her “restitution” of over ten million dollars.
It may have been because of the awful acting of HE Nanfang, or because of the apparent deceitful and malicious misuse of the law by Scandura, which had angered the judge, or because the judge had already formed her opinion and was only waiting for hearing to confirm her view, the judge announced a verdict that no one had anticipated: “I could not in good conscience find defendant guilty based on inconsistent testimonies.” Who were those words intended for?! What kind of interference and pressure was the judge under? Everyone that heard it was startled! The judge continued to announce: “According to the agreement, the charge of kidnapping is dismissed, the charge of assault with a deadly weapon is dismissed, the charge of false imprisonment is dismissed, the charge of dissuading a witness from report is dismissed, the charge of making criminal threat is dismissed.” “Defendant would not serve probation, pay a fine, go to jail, or pay restitution.” “However, all previous stay away orders remain in full force and effect”.
At that point, the judge asked Zhang’s lawyer Mark Geragos, “At the beginning, when the defendant was arrested by the police, for how long was he in custody? Two days?” Mark immediately asked Zhang; Zhang answered, “[I was] confined in jail for 45 minutes, not even a day.” After Mark answered the judge, the judge immediately said, “Defendant is sentenced to one day in jail in Los Angeles. But, because he had been locked up by the police for one day at the beginning, credit is for that.” Strange, since [she] “could not in good conscience find defendant guilty based on inconsistent testimonies”, and [she] had announced “would not go to jail”, why a “confinement for one day” [was imposed] and then a “credit” was given? What kind of game was that? What kind of balancing act was [she] doing? For who was the step laid? This case definitely does not look simple!
The judge declared the case closed and took a recess. Before ZHANG Hongbao’s side could express their gratitude, the judge had already left.
ZHANG Hongbao’s former lawyer Shapiro, a top lawyer in the United State, who happened to be sitting in the jury box, immediately came over and congratulated and embraced ZHANG Hongbao. Immediately thereafter, ZHANG Hongbao also shook the hand of attorney Mark Geragos and thanked him.
When ZHANG Hongbao left the bar, two persons who looked like Mexicans abruptly stood up from among the supporters of HE Nan-Fang. The two persons excitedly shook hands with ZHANG Hongbao and congratulated him. ZHANG Hongbao was puzzled. However, ZHANG Hongbao quickly remembered: Were they not the owners of the glass shop at the “location of incident” three years ago? They are “foreigners”; they would be most capable of verifying that nothing had happened on that day. HE Nanfang said [she] was beaten, kidnapped, and imprisoned at 8 o’clock in the morning, however, HE Nanfang had met face to face with the owners of the glass shop at 11 o’clock noon. [sic] She joked with them and then she held up an umbrella for them and went to do a quality inspection at the garage with them. These were the two Mexicans who had originally agreed to testify for ZHANG Hongbao but later said: They ran into problems and they could no longer testify. Thereafter, nothing was heard from these two persons again. The strange thing was that: Why were they among the supporters of HE Nanfang? When they said they “ran into problems and could not testify”, what problems did they run into? Were they threats? Now, they were congratulating ZHANG Hongbao from their own heart and they seemed to feel relieved. Why was that so? Were there people enticing or forcing them to give false testimonies? HE Nanfang’s utilization of her fellow country folk to give false testimony was voice- and video-taped by the professional investigation agency that had been hired by the lawyers of ZHANG Hongbao. Was this a second incident?
ZHANG Hongbao walked out of the court house with [these] questions and incomprehension. He ran into HE Nanfang, Scandura, WANG Chi, and others who happened to be standing at the door of the court house. The grimace-faced HE Nanfang was embarrassed to see ZHANG Hongbao; she wished that there were a hole in the ground into which she could burrow.
Outside the court room, the reporters surrounded the two sides and interviewed them. ZHANG Hongbao did not know whether standing so close to HE Nanfang would be a violation of the laws of the United States. Neither did [he] know whether standing so close would constitute a threat to the lives of HE Nanfang, Scandura, and WANG Chi. [He] also did not know whether a discussion of [his] opinion about the case would be a violation of the restraining orders of the United States. Therefore, they [sic] simply used a smile to take the place of a thousand words; with the original smile, [they] openly faced the media and let them take all the pictures that they wanted and then left.
HE Nan-Fang had weighty words for the media: “He got off this time.” “There is more to come.”
WANG Chi, the Shanghai man with six names, who has been in the United States for ten years but does not have his own personal properties, has neither an attorney’s license nor a legal assistant’s license, but he had the audacity to risk violating the felony of “abuse of legal rights” [sic] and explained for the media what offenses ZHANG Hongbao had committed after every appearance at court.
On May 6, 2003, through The China Press, WANG Chi made a legal analysis of ZHANG’s “offenses” by claiming: “ZHANG Hongbao has been charged with five felony offenses, such as kidnapping, assault with a deadly weapon, falsely coaching another person to give false testimony, etc. If convicted, he will be deported. When he leaves, China mainland is only place that he can go to. According to the information on the website of the Embassy of the People’s Republic of China in the United States, he is a wanted fugitive in China. And then WANG Chi indicated “They want ZHANG Hongbao to pay the victim a restitution of over ten million millions, which includes a restitution of five hundred thousand dollars for personal injuries, a restitution of two hundred fifty thousand dollars for mental distress, and a punitive damage of ten million dollars.” On May 4 of the same year, WANG Chi again told the media that “Evidence of ZHANG Hongbao’s other offenses will be published at the appropriate time.” On July 3 of the same year, WANG Chi published to the media by saying that they “have charged ZHANG Hongbao and his female followers with several offenses, including R.I.C.O violation, under provisions of the federal law”, and that R.I.C.O violation charges are filed against offenses committed by illegal gangs. WANG Chi indicated that “If convicted, the amount of restitution would be an astronomical figure.” On January 19, 2006, WANG Chi conducted a legal analysis of “no contest” through The China Press. WANG Chi said that ZHANG Hongbao’s “no contest itself means an admission of guilty.” After this case was closed on February 28, WANG Chi again explained for the media that “The judge in this case confirmed that ZHANG Hongbao has battered [another person]” (See《Chinese Daily News》, March 1, Section B3) “The most important thing about this case that it has confirmed that ZHANG Hongbao has raised his hand and battered [another person]” (See《Sing Tao Newspaper》, March 1, Section A4) From where did WANG Chi, who does not have the qualifications of a lawyer, get the audacity to explain the laws of the United States before the media over and over again? “Abuse of legal rights” is a felony in the United States. Who was backing him up so much so that he did not worry about being taken to jail and being sent back to China mainland? This is really something that people could not help but seriously think about. Unfortunately, the media just had to publish WANG Chi’s explanations of the law in the newspapers.
The most active outside the court room are the media that were sent and invited by the Chinese Communist. The China Press is on the top of the list; they changed “ZHANG Hongbao’s kidnap case” to “The case of HE Nanfang being battered”, they made up “The judge changed the verdict to violent battery” and “no meeting with or using the telephone or the internet, either directly or indirectly through another person, to get near the staff of the lawyer retained by HE Nanfang”. Some newspapers published in the headline position on the front page the news of Zhang being fined one hundred dollars, jailed for one day, and subject to a ten year restraining order. Some Chinese newspapers made up the headline of Zhang having “Admitted to six counts by no contest”. The most perplexing is that the news writer of an important radio station for the United States broadcasting to China fabricated that ZHANG Hongbao “requested penalty for misdemeanor by the district court in Los Angeles, California. He agreed to the penalty of a payment of US$ 100 and confinement in the Los Angeles district jail for one day.” [The person] also fabricated the lie that “Upon learning the charges, ZHANG Hongbao was very terrified.” The one that most represents lies like those listed above is the one by the known Chinese Communist spy SHI Lei, who had falsely accused others when he himself was the guilty one in the ensnared capture of WANG Binzhang. Using the penname of WANG Xinhua, he published the article “Zhong Gong master ZHANG Hongbao is sentenced to one day in jail, [and] penalty of one thousand.” The article claimed “On February 28, 2006, ZHANG Hongbao admitted to misdemeanor of battery on his housekeeper HE Nanfang at the Los Angeles court in California. He agreed to the terms of paying a fine of US$1,000 and imprisonment in the Los Angeles district court jail for one day for pleading guilty as suggested by prosecution. Furthermore, the judge also prohibited ZHANG Hongbao from getting near his housekeeper and four other people for 10 years”, “ZHANG Hongbao has already admitted to the crime of battery on HE Nanfang”, etc.
In order to clarify the facts regarding the close of the case, this writer records the certified case closing documents as follows:
On 02/28/06 AT 830 AM IN NORTHEASE DISTRICT DEPT NEH
CASE CALLED FOR PROBATION AND SENTENCE HEARING
PARTIES: JANICE CLAIRE CROFT (JUDGE) DENIS LEEDS (CLERK)
SUSAN L. VELASQUEZ (REP) SUSAN SCHWARTZ (DA)
DEFENDANT IS PRESENT IN COURT, AND REPSRESNTED BY MARK GERAGOS PRIVATE COUNSEL; CURTIS CHRISTLIEB, OFFICIAL COURT INTERPRETER, PRESNT AS CHINESE INTERPRETER.
OATH ON FILE.
AS TO COURT (06):
SERVE 001 DAYS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY JAIL
DEFENDANT GIVEN TOTAL CREDIT FOR 1 DAYS IN CUSTODY 1 DAYS ACTUAL CUSTODY AND 0 DAYS GOOD TIME/WORK TIME
NO PROBATION. ALL PREVIOUS STAY AWAY ORDERS REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.
COURT (06): DISPOSITION: CONVICTED
REMAINING COUNTS DISMISSED
COURT (01): DISMISSED DUE TO PLEA HEGOTIATION
COURT (02): DISMISSED DUE TO PLEA HEGOTIATION
COURT (03): DISMISSED DUE TO PLEA HEGOTIATION
COURT (04): DISMISSED DUE TO PLEA HEGOTIATION
COURT (05): DISMISSED DUE TO PLEA HEGOTIATION
DMV ABSTRACT NOT REQUIRED
NEXT SCHEDULE EVENT:
PROCEEDINGS TERMINATED
THIS DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATACHED IS A FULL, TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL ON FILE AND OF RECORD IN MY OFFICE
ATTEST 3-3-06 (HANDWRTING)
JOHN CLARKE (SIGNATURE)
CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELS, DEPUTY
(SEAL)
The court documents are clear; they require no explanations. However, one point deserves mentioning. When the court trial was over, the judge again returned to the court room. A well known person in the United States told the judge how the Chinese Communist has persecuted Zhong Gong and ZHANG HongBao. Since arriving in the United States, this was the third time that ZHANG HongBao had used the legal process to defeat persecution by the Chinese Communist. On the first occasion, ZHANG HongBao was faced with an interception by the Chinese Communist; the Superior Court on the Island of Guan rendered the decision that the Guam immigration service was to unconditionally release ZHANG HongBao. On the second occasion, ZHANG HongBao was faced with a “rape charge” brought against him by the Chinese Communist; the most authoritative organization of the United States Department of Justice --- i.e., the legal affairs department of the Library of Congress, scrutinized each of the items and determined the evidence produced by the Chinese Communist to be false; the highest level of immigration court of the United States Immigration Service rendered the decision that Mr. ZHANG HongBao be given political asylum. After listening, judge Croft indicated that she just had not believed the words of HE NanFang.
II. An evaluation of ZHANG HongBao’s third victory in court
ZHANG Hongbao’s lawyer Mark Geragos told the media: This court trial battle is a complete victory. This writer does not agree. I would only consider it a big victory because it leaves behind some unfavorable things.
If it were a complete victory, it is political one and not a legal one. The Chinese Communist uses “sustained warfare tactic” on ZHANG Hongbao and Zhong Gong. They had lost the previous rounds. At the end of 2002, they formulated the “911 Decapitation Operation”. The idea for the plan was provided by the Chinese Communist’s legal professionals in the United States. The plan begins with laying a felony trap starting from the dialing of “911 to call the police” so as to get ZHANG Hongbao in jail, and then, using large amounts of trade, [they] would engage in a “judicial transaction” with the United States and bring ZHANG Hongbao back to the country for decapitation. To realize this goal, the Chinese Communist commenced three series, a total of forty cases, of litigation against ZHANG Hongbao and they alternately used legal warfare, public opinion warfare, and psychological warfare. In the course of utilizing the three kinds of warfare, almost all of the heavy weight intelligence personnel in the United States were mobilized; a high cost was paid. Of these three series of litigations, HE Nangang was to take the lead role in the first series; YAN QingXin collaborated with and directed [her]; the criminal case was the dragon head. YAN QingXin was the new top player in the second series; LIU JunGuo and ZHANG Qi collaborated [with him]. In the third series, Ye Ning took the lead. Using the words that HE Nanfang has carelessly let slip out of her mouth: “ZHANG Hongbao must be moved this time” [sic] Nevertheless, heaven did not want to destroy Zhang. All five of the felonies were dismissed. Without a felony, there is no basis upon which to exchange for ZHANG Hongbao. The 911 Decapitation Operation has become a laughing stalk. What makes the Chinese Communist most mad is: This battle has made the Chinese Communist lose on both ends. The 911 Decapitation Operation has forced ZHANG Hongbao to expose their killer move, which they were most concerned about --- “The Chinese Communist’s fatal killer move and their global military strategic targets”. All of a sudden, it shed light for the once unsettled U.S. strategic policy toward China. All along, the United States strategic policy had been in an undecided state because the United States was uncertain of the Chinese Communist’s decision making mechanism, the decision makers, the goals of the decision makers, their intentions, the motives, the actions that the Chinese Communist would take, and the weapons that they would use to accomplish their goal of being the leader. ZHANG Hongbao broke each and every one of these puzzles in his article《The Goals》simply by using a limited number of words. Only then did the United States realize the weight and value of ZHANG Hongbao and understood why the Chinese Communist would not let go of ZHANG Hongbao. This was the reason why the United States government had to hastily close the case on February 28, before the arrival of HU Jintao! Uncle Sam has received a 13 billion dollar order for Boeing airplanes, but he would not hand over the person. On the other hand, in order to use the three warfare to win the 911 Decapitation Operation, the Chinese Communist has utilized almost all of their top spies and intelligence people that they had careful hidden in the United States; almost all of them have been exposed; this loss is immeasurable. The 911 Decapitation Operation lost miserably. Politically, ZHANG Hongbao won a complete victory. After the test of the judicial fire, he has become even more adept.
(Extracted from forum:
Message Board New York Time: http://messages.yahoo.com/
World Public Opinion Net: http://www.wpoforum.com/viewtopic.php?fid=1&tid=11715
Omnitalk Net: http://bbs.omnitalk.org/politics/messages/77042.html)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Major consolidated report《The Decapitation Operation below the Rocky Mountain》Part I
“911 Decapitation Operation” was miserably defeated; ZHANG Hongbao won
three rounds out of three in the United States in the fight against persecution
------- A belated true account of the close of the criminal court case of
HE Nanfang vs. ZHANG Hongbao
Capitol Hill independent writer Fredric Wilson
Reported by Capitol Hill independent writer Fredric Wilson from Pasadena on March 15.
Today is the third anniversary of the false frame-up of ZHANG Hongbao after he settled down in Pasadena. Two weeks ago, which was February 28, the criminal court of the Los Angeles Superior Court in Pasadena rendered a final probation and sentence hearing on the five felonies of “kidnapping”, “assault with a deadly weapon”, “false imprisonment”, “dissuading a witness from report”, and “making criminal threat” that HE Nanfang had filed against ZHANG Hong-Ba. [sic] The final judgment is that all of the five felonies [charges] were dismissed; the US$ 150,000 “medical expenses” restitution and the imprisonment of ZHANG Hongbao for at least ten years demanded by the prosecution and HE Nanfang were denied. Even the agreement for payment of US$ 1,000 court costs by ZHANG Hongbao was cancelled. Nevertheless, the previous stay away orders that bar ZHANG Hongbao from getting near HE Nanfang remains in full force and effect. As such, the curtain comes down on this time consuming criminal case, which called for forty hearings and lasted three years, with ZHANG Hongbao winning the case.
This writer, being an eyewitness at the court trial on February 28, should have issued this article immediately. However, because the court trial termination documents were done only on March 3, and it took time to obtain the original documents for review and to translate the court trial documents and this article from Chinese to English and vice versa, this writer did not want to issue this article hastily. By doing so, this big case, which has caused a huge stir in the media in China mainland, the United States, and even around the world, can be reported prudently; at the same time a strong counter-strike can be launched against the twisted reports of the media, such as “The China Press” and the Justice Party, that are utilized by the Chinese Communist. In any case, this is a belated report; this writer can only make up for the blemish of lateness with a detailed true account of the court trial.
I. Inside and outside the court room
The case against ZHANG Hongbao, which contained five felony counts, was heard for the 40th time at the Los Angeles Superior Court North West District (Pasadena Court) Criminal Court H, at 8:30 a.m. on February 28. On ZHANG Hongbao’s side, only he himself and his attorney appeared in court. On HE Nanfang’s side, a team of twenty some people showed up. The team included four prosecutors (this was something that had never happened before; usually, only one prosecutor on the case would appear in court), reporters from The China Press which is a mouthpiece of the Chinese Communist, JI Xiaofeng who has been accused to be a Chinese Communist spy on the internet, WANG Chi, who has close ties with the Chinese Consulate and claims to be a member of HE Nanfang’s defense team, a crowd of reporters who have been invited to come by the Chinese Communist (this crowd of reporters apparently had received prior notice about the final battle on this date; before this, the reporters, with the exception of the reporters of The China Press, had not shown up for twenty some hearings), people who were organized to come to watch and to cheer them on, and HE Nanfang’s civil case attorney. HE Nanfang herself held two big boards each of which measured one square meter. It appeared that the people on the side of HE Nanfang came prepared and ready for an all out fight in a decisive battle.
ZHANG Hongbao was still wearing the smart-looking dark blue suite that fitted him very well, a dark blue neck tie that made him look serene, profound, dignified, and confident; his rosy complexion made him appear a lot younger than his actual age. HE Nanfang, on the other hand, stuck closely with WANG Chi each step of the way; she wore a light brown overcoat with a long scarf wrapped around her neck; her shoulder length hair made her stout stature look even shorter; her face is wax yellow and haggard; she appeared nervous and uneasy. WANG Chi constantly gave her some instructions, and HE Nanfang constantly nodded her head uncomfortably. Because all of her hair was combed backward, a one-inch long knife scar was appeared slightly above HE Nanfang’s eyebrows. It has been reported that the knife scar was the result of her fight with someone in the past.
The atmosphere in court was somewhat different. ZHANG Hongbao seemed to feel it. After his lawyer Mark Geragos arrived at court, ZHANG immediately asked him to go outside the court to tell him his own views and requests. ZHANG clearly told his lawyer: If the other side did not heed the judge’s idea of a compromise and was adamant on adding unreasonable requests and created troubles, then we would fight from the very begining, from the five felonies all the way to the jury. The US$ 96,000 medical expenses demanded by the other side were a fabrication; we must not bear even one penny of that amount!
Sure enough, the prosecutor made a request for a verdict today to the court. The judge granted the request and ordered court hearing to begin at 1:30 in the afternoon with the judgment to be made after the hearing.
Court hearing began in the afternoon. Instead of the usual apparel, ZHANG Hongbao wore a royal blue leather jacket; he did not wear a neck tie; although he looked casual, he did not lose the seriousness for court appearance; he held a heavy folder in his hands, which displayed an attitude of being ready for battle. ZHANG Hong-Bao sat next to the reporter from The China Press, opened the folder, took out a tape, and told the reporter of The China Press: It was a voice recording of JI Xiaofeng telling another person to demand from ZHANG Hongbao a list of the 38,000,000 Zhong Gong members and information of all of the assets of Zhong Gong; the recording, which was given to him by a friend of his, would show the spy identity of JI Xiaofeng. In a while, he would give the tape to the court as evidence to let the judge to understand what kind of people were involved in the case so that the judge would have a better understanding of the background of the case. After a while, the reporter of The China Press left. Moments later, JI Xiaofeng disappeared and, to the end, was never seen again.
The hearing began. Mark Geragos, ZHANG Hongbao’s lawyer, presented his case to the court first. He mentioned only two points. First, the medical records in the court file showed that: When HE Nanfang examined at the Arcadia Hospital for the first time, the doctor has said that he did not see any bruise or swelling. After a customary examination, the doctor was of the opinion that hospitalization for observation was not necessary and HE Nanfang was sent home without even a prescription. The pictures produced by HE Nanfang showing black and purple bruises were taken several days later by someone that HE Nanfang had asked. Second, there were several discrepancies in HE Nanfang’s testimonies. Mark Geragos simply spoke three sentences on these two points. Although few words were spoken, they were clear, concise, to the point, and very persuasive. The Arcadia Hospital is a famous church hospital in Los Angeles; its practice of medicine is meticulous and its diagnoses are authoritative. If anyone who goes to the hospital for external injuries is considered to need treatment, he would be required to be hospitalized for several days for observation; during hospitalization, he would undergo complete physical examination several times and treatment would be given; he would be released by the doctor only when he is fit to go. The answer would be very obvious if there was no hospitalization, no prescription, and the authoritative diagnosis was “no bruise or swelling observed”. It is also a strong rebuttal to HE Nanfang’s claim of “serious loss of work capacity” when she demands a restitution of 20,000,000 dollars. Whether HE Nanfang’s bumps and bruises were caused herself or someone else was no longer important to the judge who was trying the case. The judge’s eyes showed approval. Mark brought up the second point very skillfully and artfully; he did not say that HE Nanfang lied, deceived the judge, or scorned the court; he just said that were “several discrepancies” in her testimonies. There could only be one account of one fact. What does it tell you when different accounts are given in different situations at different times? The judge must have felt that too after she read the records. Mark led everyone in court to find HE Nanfang’s word unacceptable. Mark lived up to his reputation as a top criminal defense lawyer in the United States; ZHANG Hongbao picked the right person.
Next, prosecutor Susan Schwarts countered. First, she held up HE Nanfang’s two big one square meter photos and showed them to the court. Each of the photos showed bruises. Putting aside the issue of how they were made, these big photographs were truly quite impressive. They could easily evoke sympathy for the “victim” and anger toward the aggressor. The propaganda effect is quite effective. The prosecutor said that: When a person is injured, bruises and bumps do not necessarily appear right away. Sometimes, they would show up only after a few days. When such words were uttered, the audience was aroused. Was that because the rebuttal effective? No! It was because the prosecutor spoke words of ignorance; particularly, the words came from a criminal prosecutor! Clinical experiments in the fields of injury medicine and combat sport medicine have proved that the head and the face are the areas where the human skin is the most fragile; when impacted by a strong force, the head would immediately develop a bump and black and purple bruises would immediately show up on the face; the sport of boxing provide the best proof for that. No one athlete would get a bruised nose, a swollen face, and a black eye only days after being punched; instead, the results would be visible immediately at the time of the boxing game. On the other hand, black and purple bruises could appear gradually in other parts of the body two to three days later due to the different levels of impacts inflicted. Judges and prosecutors who work on criminal cases should know this professional clinical knowledge in the areas of injury medicine and combat sport medicine. The unprofessional remarks of the prosecutor caused everyone in court to examine closely the two big photographs. The amazing thing was that: One of the big pictures happened to show a deep bruise about the size of a chicken egg at the corner of HE Nanfang’s eye. How big was the force that caused such a result? With infliction of such a big force, how could “no bruise or swelling” have been found by the authoritative hospital when she was examined at the hospital eight hours later? People could not help questioning the truthfulness of the photograph. HE Nanfang does not know computer technology; then, who helped her fabricate it?
In any case, the judge was still very fair; she gave HE Nanfang the opportunity to testify, which let her recount what had happened. This time, she no longer cried or showed extreme sadness; neither was she emotional and confusing with what she was saying. Instead, she smiled first and then spoke eloquently; however, her smile was too fake and the two ends of her mouth pulled up unnaturally, which made everyone feel very uneasy. HE Nanfang might have realized that, so, twice she adjusted the upward movement of the ends of her mouth. However, such actions brought adverse results; they gave people an unexplainable feeling that she was an awful actress. In any case, HE Nanfang’s speech was calm and very slow, word by word. Apparently, she had been professionally coached over and over again; she was virtually like YAN Qingxin when she was putting on the deceitful performance. Just as she had recited to the media each time, HE Nanfang again recounted how she was kidnapped and physically assaulted by ZHANG Hongbao, and then she added something new; she testified to the judge that: “Last night, ZHANG Hongbao was still threatening her.” [sic] Those present in the court murmured when they heard it: Was that possible? HE Nanfang continued by mimicking YAN Qingxin’s performance: “ZHANG Hongbao said to me beside the swimming pool, ‘I am going to kick you into the pool!’” HE Nanfang said, “Master, wouldn’t that lead to death?” “ZHANG Hongbao said, ‘Who knows!’!” [sic] …
When the judge heard that, she abruptly asked HE Nanfang, “Did this happen on the day of the incident?” HE Nanfang, who was immersed in the state of story telling, was confused by the abrupt questioning of the judge; she did not know how to respond at that instant. After a moment of silence, she said, “Not on that day. It was around the New Year!” Then, the judge asked again, “Specifically, on which day? Was someone else present?” HE Nanfang falteringly said, “In any case, it was New Year’s time; it was around the Chinese New Year. No one else was around.” The judge showed impatience with the added piece of news, the inconsistencies, and the uncorroborated “testimonies” that she liked to give; the judge stopped HE Nanfang from talking further. She directly asked her, “What are you demanding?” This time, HE Nanfang replied without thinking, “The medical expenses that I have provided to the court came to 96,000 dollars. There were other expenses that have not been produced. The total was 150,000 dollars. I demand ZHANG Hongbao to pay for them. ZHANG Hongbao is still threatening the lives of my family members. I want the court to continue the restraining order and prohibit him from getting near me or interfering with me through the internet, the media, the telephone, or the email.” The judge immediately asked HE Nanfang, “How many years would you want?” HE Nan-Fang said, “Ten years.” At this point, Scandura, HE Nan-Fang’s civil case laywer, walked past the bar and said to the judge, “ZHANG Hongbao has also threatened the lives of my office staff and mine. We also want the court to issue a restraining order barring ZHANG Hongbao from getting near us.” When the judge heard that, she said plainly to Scandura, “You are in danger? You report it to the police!” Scandura was very embarrassed, but he still wanted to talk. The judge motioned for him to stop; he stepped back humiliated.
The untimely appearance of Scandura made people recall what happened about two years ago in the criminal court during ZHANG Hongbao’s criminal case. As the civil case lawyer of HE Nanfang, Scandura went past the gallery and unrestrainedly pointed his fingers and waved his limbs. With a series of machine-gun berates, Mark Geragos, who was firmly seated in the criminal lawyer’s seat, accused him of violating the rules of the criminal court and asked the judge to expel him. That led to Scandura’s being expelled from the criminal court in shame. For two years, Scandura had not appeared in criminal court again. Unexpectedly, he appeared in court again today. It seems that Scandura has not learned his lesson; he is really not sufficiently mature or well composed. One could not help but worry for HE Nan-Fang for entrusting him with the great task of handling her “restitution” of over ten million dollars.
It may have been because of the awful acting of HE Nanfang, or because of the apparent deceitful and malicious misuse of the law by Scandura, which had angered the judge, or because the judge had already formed her opinion and was only waiting for hearing to confirm her view, the judge announced a verdict that no one had anticipated: “I could not in good conscience find defendant guilty based on inconsistent testimonies.” Who were those words intended for?! What kind of interference and pressure was the judge under? Everyone that heard it was startled! The judge continued to announce: “According to the agreement, the charge of kidnapping is dismissed, the charge of assault with a deadly weapon is dismissed, the charge of false imprisonment is dismissed, the charge of dissuading a witness from report is dismissed, the charge of making criminal threat is dismissed.” “Defendant would not serve probation, pay a fine, go to jail, or pay restitution.” “However, all previous stay away orders remain in full force and effect”.
At that point, the judge asked Zhang’s lawyer Mark Geragos, “At the beginning, when the defendant was arrested by the police, for how long was he in custody? Two days?” Mark immediately asked Zhang; Zhang answered, “[I was] confined in jail for 45 minutes, not even a day.” After Mark answered the judge, the judge immediately said, “Defendant is sentenced to one day in jail in Los Angeles. But, because he had been locked up by the police for one day at the beginning, credit is for that.” Strange, since [she] “could not in good conscience find defendant guilty based on inconsistent testimonies”, and [she] had announced “would not go to jail”, why a “confinement for one day” [was imposed] and then a “credit” was given? What kind of game was that? What kind of balancing act was [she] doing? For who was the step laid? This case definitely does not look simple!
The judge declared the case closed and took a recess. Before ZHANG Hongbao’s side could express their gratitude, the judge had already left.
ZHANG Hongbao’s former lawyer Shapiro, a top lawyer in the United State, who happened to be sitting in the jury box, immediately came over and congratulated and embraced ZHANG Hongbao. Immediately thereafter, ZHANG Hongbao also shook the hand of attorney Mark Geragos and thanked him.
When ZHANG Hongbao left the bar, two persons who looked like Mexicans abruptly stood up from among the supporters of HE Nan-Fang. The two persons excitedly shook hands with ZHANG Hongbao and congratulated him. ZHANG Hongbao was puzzled. However, ZHANG Hongbao quickly remembered: Were they not the owners of the glass shop at the “location of incident” three years ago? They are “foreigners”; they would be most capable of verifying that nothing had happened on that day. HE Nanfang said [she] was beaten, kidnapped, and imprisoned at 8 o’clock in the morning, however, HE Nanfang had met face to face with the owners of the glass shop at 11 o’clock noon. [sic] She joked with them and then she held up an umbrella for them and went to do a quality inspection at the garage with them. These were the two Mexicans who had originally agreed to testify for ZHANG Hongbao but later said: They ran into problems and they could no longer testify. Thereafter, nothing was heard from these two persons again. The strange thing was that: Why were they among the supporters of HE Nanfang? When they said they “ran into problems and could not testify”, what problems did they run into? Were they threats? Now, they were congratulating ZHANG Hongbao from their own heart and they seemed to feel relieved. Why was that so? Were there people enticing or forcing them to give false testimonies? HE Nanfang’s utilization of her fellow country folk to give false testimony was voice- and video-taped by the professional investigation agency that had been hired by the lawyers of ZHANG Hongbao. Was this a second incident?
ZHANG Hongbao walked out of the court house with [these] questions and incomprehension. He ran into HE Nanfang, Scandura, WANG Chi, and others who happened to be standing at the door of the court house. The grimace-faced HE Nanfang was embarrassed to see ZHANG Hongbao; she wished that there were a hole in the ground into which she could burrow.
Outside the court room, the reporters surrounded the two sides and interviewed them. ZHANG Hongbao did not know whether standing so close to HE Nanfang would be a violation of the laws of the United States. Neither did [he] know whether standing so close would constitute a threat to the lives of HE Nanfang, Scandura, and WANG Chi. [He] also did not know whether a discussion of [his] opinion about the case would be a violation of the restraining orders of the United States. Therefore, they [sic] simply used a smile to take the place of a thousand words; with the original smile, [they] openly faced the media and let them take all the pictures that they wanted and then left.
HE Nan-Fang had weighty words for the media: “He got off this time.” “There is more to come.”
WANG Chi, the Shanghai man with six names, who has been in the United States for ten years but does not have his own personal properties, has neither an attorney’s license nor a legal assistant’s license, but he had the audacity to risk violating the felony of “abuse of legal rights” [sic] and explained for the media what offenses ZHANG Hongbao had committed after every appearance at court.
On May 6, 2003, through The China Press, WANG Chi made a legal analysis of ZHANG’s “offenses” by claiming: “ZHANG Hongbao has been charged with five felony offenses, such as kidnapping, assault with a deadly weapon, falsely coaching another person to give false testimony, etc. If convicted, he will be deported. When he leaves, China mainland is only place that he can go to. According to the information on the website of the Embassy of the People’s Republic of China in the United States, he is a wanted fugitive in China. And then WANG Chi indicated “They want ZHANG Hongbao to pay the victim a restitution of over ten million millions, which includes a restitution of five hundred thousand dollars for personal injuries, a restitution of two hundred fifty thousand dollars for mental distress, and a punitive damage of ten million dollars.” On May 4 of the same year, WANG Chi again told the media that “Evidence of ZHANG Hongbao’s other offenses will be published at the appropriate time.” On July 3 of the same year, WANG Chi published to the media by saying that they “have charged ZHANG Hongbao and his female followers with several offenses, including R.I.C.O violation, under provisions of the federal law”, and that R.I.C.O violation charges are filed against offenses committed by illegal gangs. WANG Chi indicated that “If convicted, the amount of restitution would be an astronomical figure.” On January 19, 2006, WANG Chi conducted a legal analysis of “no contest” through The China Press. WANG Chi said that ZHANG Hongbao’s “no contest itself means an admission of guilty.” After this case was closed on February 28, WANG Chi again explained for the media that “The judge in this case confirmed that ZHANG Hongbao has battered [another person]” (See《Chinese Daily News》, March 1, Section B3) “The most important thing about this case that it has confirmed that ZHANG Hongbao has raised his hand and battered [another person]” (See《Sing Tao Newspaper》, March 1, Section A4) From where did WANG Chi, who does not have the qualifications of a lawyer, get the audacity to explain the laws of the United States before the media over and over again? “Abuse of legal rights” is a felony in the United States. Who was backing him up so much so that he did not worry about being taken to jail and being sent back to China mainland? This is really something that people could not help but seriously think about. Unfortunately, the media just had to publish WANG Chi’s explanations of the law in the newspapers.
The most active outside the court room are the media that were sent and invited by the Chinese Communist. The China Press is on the top of the list; they changed “ZHANG Hongbao’s kidnap case” to “The case of HE Nanfang being battered”, they made up “The judge changed the verdict to violent battery” and “no meeting with or using the telephone or the internet, either directly or indirectly through another person, to get near the staff of the lawyer retained by HE Nanfang”. Some newspapers published in the headline position on the front page the news of Zhang being fined one hundred dollars, jailed for one day, and subject to a ten year restraining order. Some Chinese newspapers made up the headline of Zhang having “Admitted to six counts by no contest”. The most perplexing is that the news writer of an important radio station for the United States broadcasting to China fabricated that ZHANG Hongbao “requested penalty for misdemeanor by the district court in Los Angeles, California. He agreed to the penalty of a payment of US$ 100 and confinement in the Los Angeles district jail for one day.” [The person] also fabricated the lie that “Upon learning the charges, ZHANG Hongbao was very terrified.” The one that most represents lies like those listed above is the one by the known Chinese Communist spy SHI Lei, who had falsely accused others when he himself was the guilty one in the ensnared capture of WANG Binzhang. Using the penname of WANG Xinhua, he published the article “Zhong Gong master ZHANG Hongbao is sentenced to one day in jail, [and] penalty of one thousand.” The article claimed “On February 28, 2006, ZHANG Hongbao admitted to misdemeanor of battery on his housekeeper HE Nanfang at the Los Angeles court in California. He agreed to the terms of paying a fine of US$1,000 and imprisonment in the Los Angeles district court jail for one day for pleading guilty as suggested by prosecution. Furthermore, the judge also prohibited ZHANG Hongbao from getting near his housekeeper and four other people for 10 years”, “ZHANG Hongbao has already admitted to the crime of battery on HE Nanfang”, etc.
In order to clarify the facts regarding the close of the case, this writer records the certified case closing documents as follows:
On 02/28/06 AT 830 AM IN NORTHEASE DISTRICT DEPT NEH
CASE CALLED FOR PROBATION AND SENTENCE HEARING
PARTIES: JANICE CLAIRE CROFT (JUDGE) DENIS LEEDS (CLERK)
SUSAN L. VELASQUEZ (REP) SUSAN SCHWARTZ (DA)
DEFENDANT IS PRESENT IN COURT, AND REPSRESNTED BY MARK GERAGOS PRIVATE COUNSEL; CURTIS CHRISTLIEB, OFFICIAL COURT INTERPRETER, PRESNT AS CHINESE INTERPRETER.
OATH ON FILE.
AS TO COURT (06):
SERVE 001 DAYS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY JAIL
DEFENDANT GIVEN TOTAL CREDIT FOR 1 DAYS IN CUSTODY 1 DAYS ACTUAL CUSTODY AND 0 DAYS GOOD TIME/WORK TIME
NO PROBATION. ALL PREVIOUS STAY AWAY ORDERS REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.
COURT (06): DISPOSITION: CONVICTED
REMAINING COUNTS DISMISSED
COURT (01): DISMISSED DUE TO PLEA HEGOTIATION
COURT (02): DISMISSED DUE TO PLEA HEGOTIATION
COURT (03): DISMISSED DUE TO PLEA HEGOTIATION
COURT (04): DISMISSED DUE TO PLEA HEGOTIATION
COURT (05): DISMISSED DUE TO PLEA HEGOTIATION
DMV ABSTRACT NOT REQUIRED
NEXT SCHEDULE EVENT:
PROCEEDINGS TERMINATED
THIS DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATACHED IS A FULL, TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL ON FILE AND OF RECORD IN MY OFFICE
ATTEST 3-3-06 (HANDWRTING)
JOHN CLARKE (SIGNATURE)
CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELS, DEPUTY
(SEAL)
The court documents are clear; they require no explanations. However, one point deserves mentioning. When the court trial was over, the judge again returned to the court room. A well known person in the United States told the judge how the Chinese Communist has persecuted Zhong Gong and ZHANG HongBao. Since arriving in the United States, this was the third time that ZHANG HongBao had used the legal process to defeat persecution by the Chinese Communist. On the first occasion, ZHANG HongBao was faced with an interception by the Chinese Communist; the Superior Court on the Island of Guan rendered the decision that the Guam immigration service was to unconditionally release ZHANG HongBao. On the second occasion, ZHANG HongBao was faced with a “rape charge” brought against him by the Chinese Communist; the most authoritative organization of the United States Department of Justice --- i.e., the legal affairs department of the Library of Congress, scrutinized each of the items and determined the evidence produced by the Chinese Communist to be false; the highest level of immigration court of the United States Immigration Service rendered the decision that Mr. ZHANG HongBao be given political asylum. After listening, judge Croft indicated that she just had not believed the words of HE NanFang.
II. An evaluation of ZHANG HongBao’s third victory in court
ZHANG Hongbao’s lawyer Mark Geragos told the media: This court trial battle is a complete victory. This writer does not agree. I would only consider it a big victory because it leaves behind some unfavorable things.
If it were a complete victory, it is political one and not a legal one. The Chinese Communist uses “sustained warfare tactic” on ZHANG Hongbao and Zhong Gong. They had lost the previous rounds. At the end of 2002, they formulated the “911 Decapitation Operation”. The idea for the plan was provided by the Chinese Communist’s legal professionals in the United States. The plan begins with laying a felony trap starting from the dialing of “911 to call the police” so as to get ZHANG Hongbao in jail, and then, using large amounts of trade, [they] would engage in a “judicial transaction” with the United States and bring ZHANG Hongbao back to the country for decapitation. To realize this goal, the Chinese Communist commenced three series, a total of forty cases, of litigation against ZHANG Hongbao and they alternately used legal warfare, public opinion warfare, and psychological warfare. In the course of utilizing the three kinds of warfare, almost all of the heavy weight intelligence personnel in the United States were mobilized; a high cost was paid. Of these three series of litigations, HE Nangang was to take the lead role in the first series; YAN QingXin collaborated with and directed [her]; the criminal case was the dragon head. YAN QingXin was the new top player in the second series; LIU JunGuo and ZHANG Qi collaborated [with him]. In the third series, Ye Ning took the lead. Using the words that HE Nanfang has carelessly let slip out of her mouth: “ZHANG Hongbao must be moved this time” [sic] Nevertheless, heaven did not want to destroy Zhang. All five of the felonies were dismissed. Without a felony, there is no basis upon which to exchange for ZHANG Hongbao. The 911 Decapitation Operation has become a laughing stalk. What makes the Chinese Communist most mad is: This battle has made the Chinese Communist lose on both ends. The 911 Decapitation Operation has forced ZHANG Hongbao to expose their killer move, which they were most concerned about --- “The Chinese Communist’s fatal killer move and their global military strategic targets”. All of a sudden, it shed light for the once unsettled U.S. strategic policy toward China. All along, the United States strategic policy had been in an undecided state because the United States was uncertain of the Chinese Communist’s decision making mechanism, the decision makers, the goals of the decision makers, their intentions, the motives, the actions that the Chinese Communist would take, and the weapons that they would use to accomplish their goal of being the leader. ZHANG Hongbao broke each and every one of these puzzles in his article《The Goals》simply by using a limited number of words. Only then did the United States realize the weight and value of ZHANG Hongbao and understood why the Chinese Communist would not let go of ZHANG Hongbao. This was the reason why the United States government had to hastily close the case on February 28, before the arrival of HU Jintao! Uncle Sam has received a 13 billion dollar order for Boeing airplanes, but he would not hand over the person. On the other hand, in order to use the three warfare to win the 911 Decapitation Operation, the Chinese Communist has utilized almost all of their top spies and intelligence people that they had careful hidden in the United States; almost all of them have been exposed; this loss is immeasurable. The 911 Decapitation Operation lost miserably. Politically, ZHANG Hongbao won a complete victory. After the test of the judicial fire, he has become even more adept.
(Extracted from forum:
Message Board New York Time: http://messages.yahoo.com/
World Public Opinion Net: http://www.wpoforum.com/viewtopic.php?fid=1&tid=11715
Omnitalk Net: http://bbs.omnitalk.org/politics/messages/77042.html)