Search results

  1. K

    Result of the court hearing 12th July 2010

    It's interesting to see how everyone is interpreting stuffs to his/ her own understanding. The judge will have the final word. Like I keep saying, the case is not a certain win or lose for DoS or Mr. White. It can go either way.
  2. K

    Result of the court hearing 12th July 2010

    I wouldn't say it is broken. When you analogized this with an iPod, sometimes on the iPod when you press "shuffle songs" it can play track 1, track 2 and track 3 in that order before it even plays track 50 or something. Is the iPod broken then? Certainly not. Back to the cd player,playing only...
  3. K

    Result of the court hearing 12th July 2010

    To help you guys out, this is the link you want to refer to http://www.ilw.com/articles/2011,0517-white.shtm I don't think it is any fatal blow to the case. The letter was sent on May 10 but the website was done from 6 and explanations from DoS indicated that they realized it around May 6. In...
  4. K

    Result of the court hearing 12th July 2010

    Note: I am not saying that the Rules of evidence applies or not, I just want you to know that is a legal meaning even in the Rules of Evidence. Besides, I am not saying Mr. Amin was impeached or not today. I am saying he could be impeached IF he provides inconsistent, inaccurate explanations or...
  5. K

    Result of the court hearing 12th July 2010

    Use "Black Law Dictionary" and not "Webster" for the legal definition of impeachment. You can google " impeaching-- Federal Rules of Evidence"
  6. K

    Result of the court hearing 12th July 2010

    Your explanation to the meaning of impeachment is a POLITICAL definition eg. The president could be impeached and convicted by the senate. So the impeachment here does not mean Mr. Amin should be fired or anything. The legal meaning of impeachment, which is what I was referring to means: when...
  7. K

    Result of the court hearing 12th July 2010

    No one should be optimistic...When it all started people said the case will be thrown out ; others said it is a slam-dunk case for DoS. "That seems fair to you" but is it also fair to the plaintiffs? . But remember that Mr. Amin can always be impeached if he provides inconsistent testimonies or...
  8. K

    Result of the court hearing 12th July 2010

    No court gives injunction for days. Either preliminary injunction or injunction itself. Preliminary injunction is given until the case is finally decided on merits. Injunction is given permanently after the case has been finally decided and the moving party for injunction won. TRO last for...
  9. K

    Litigation update this week

    A case began in July 2008 involving Caylee Anthony; many said, it was a SLAM-DUNK case and others said it was a already lost case. On July 5, 2011, the court shocked many with NO GUILTY VERDICT. Joaz Baez, out of no where is now being acclaimed as a hero. In 995, similarly in O. J Simpson , the...
  10. K

    Litigation update this week

    Refer to ABA Model Rule 6.1. The meaning of Pro Bono there.
  11. K

    Litigation update this week

    Win Dv: I concur, lets stick to the topic because people are from different backgrounds and also have different interpretations of the bible; some dont even believe in the bible at all. Sompe people are christians, but dont bring that up anywahere in their discussions or comments. It was just...
  12. K

    Litigation update this week

    Raesvky: All that I am trying to say is that, no lawyer puts up an argument for only one issue. You raise as many issues as the facts warrant, but it does not necessarily mean that you are right on those issues. The reason behind that idea is, if you dont raise those issues for the first time...
  13. K

    Litigation update this week

    read the laws about "mistake." Assuming this was even a mistake it is not easy for DoS to wring itself out of making a promise.
  14. K

    Litigation update this week

    what do u mean by without Congressional mandate? No one can just terminate an offer or revoke it when the other person has DETRIMENTALLY and HEAVILY relied on your promise. DoS did not require any power from Congress to send those letters: it is very simple. I have tied the facts to the possible...
  15. K

    Litigation update this week

    Interesting: as more details surface, people will realised that: 1. This not a SLAM-DUNK case for DoS nor Mr. White 2. The dots are not connecting about what actually happened I understand some people on other days between the 7th and 30th. But most importantly, with life-changing...
  16. K

    Litigation update this week

    But you are still wrong. The court has jurisdiction and plaintiffs have standing. Jurisdiction: this is a federal question and also Art III of the Constitution gives Supreme Court and other federal court jurisdiction over cases involving government officials... etc. That's why people from other...
  17. K

    Litigation update this week

    Font expect DoS definition of "random" to be the same as plaintiffs' definition: thats why it is an issue.
  18. K

    Litigation update this week

    It's not a good one. Results were cancelled on May 13, and Plaintiffs sent a letter to defendants on May 17 and subsequently on May 25. Plaintiffs have tried all means to settle the case out of court, but defendants neither responded to plaintiffs' letter nor phone calls. Plaintiffs expended...
  19. K

    Litigation update this week

    Unassailable credentials yet they (he) failed to make reasonable and diligent checks before publishing the results.
Top