Search results

Update on my appeal Lazy and others, So far I have updated you that Government filed to moot my appeal as my Green card was issued and I opposed the motion for mootness. The court granted the government's motion to dismiss the case as moot. The district court's judgment is vacated, and the...

Lazy, Do you remember that there was someone who filed notice of appeal with the third circuit and a few weeks afterward got his green card? I was wondering if you have his appeal docket number. I would like to add that the the 1st 4th and 7th cir cases that were mutually dismissed and I know...

Do you think Murthy.com or Washington post would be official enough for that purpose?

4 Questions for Lazy I need some sorts of official source/documents so that I can include them in my response to motion to dismiss as moot. They should be official enough to be presentable to the court 1-Do we have the statistics of the number of AOS mandamus lawsuits in 2007? 2- Also...

lazy_cis Now the time came and AUSA called for stipulation to dismiss the case for mootness. I did not agree and he is going to file for mootness tomorrow. I will have sent my response on Friday. I was wondering if any of the mandamus cases in appeal courts are still pending or all have...

Update on my case I have received my approval notice in the mail. Also received status update email that the Card has been mailed. Now the hard work starts for me. AUSA will file a status report with the circuit on April 25. The circuit will probably remove the abeyance and put the case in...

Some judges in ED Michigan are not even aware of the presedents of their own sixth circuit. The 6th Circuit does not preclude the possibility of the nunc pro tunc releif for I-485. I am buliding up my arguments for fighting mootness in my case and I am going to argue the availability of nunc pro...

Lazy and Wom_ri I do not think it is possible to change amend the complaint at this time. Furthermore, you cannot raise new issues in appeal if it has not already been raised in the district court. Therefore, I cannot explicitly raise the issue of backdating green card. However, I can probably...

Update As some of you know, the briefing on my appeals has completed on early Feb. On late Feb government filed motion to hold my appeal in abeyance. Following the new memo, they told the court that my case will become moot in 60 days. On the same day the court granted the motion to hold...

wom_ri can you bring me up to speed as what these citations you mentioned are referring to? In other words, are you building up some new argument for any particular purpose for which the above citations can help?

Gov. Br. at 29 = Government Brief in my case at page 29. You should find relevant page in Government's MTD in you case and quote that.

This is the argument I used in my reply brief. Line Cutting Finally, the government asserts that ordering the processing of the appellant’s application “would unfairly favors applicants with the means to file complaints in federal court.” Gov. Br. at 29. In other words, the...

Mootness exception Lazy and others, I have submitted my reply brief and the AILF is in contact to see if AUSA agrees with their filing amicus out of time. No response from AUSA yet. I think it is a good idea to start working on mootness exception and do some research. Do you think that the...

You should certainly file you opposition to MTD. The good thing is that you have not got the worst AUSA in E.D Mich. But Mona Majzoub is not a judge, she is a majistrate judge. Who is your judge and has he reffered the case to the majistrate?

hyyz, who is your judge? and who is your AUSA?

Lazycis Is the successful case in the fourth circuit the one that used the 4th cir. appellant Brief you helped preparing based on your own brief?

Specified under Subchapter II Lazy, Can you do me a favor and look at the 6th circuit opinion in Abu-Khaliel v. Gonzales 436 F.3d 627 (6th Cir. 2004). http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/06a0044p-06.pdf According to the Abu-Khaliel, are the regulations, which make explicit the implicit...

I vaguely remember having seen in some declarations that only 1% of the name checks last longer than 6 months; Meaning that 99% of the name checks are done within 6 months. Can any one provide me with the reference? Thanks,

Jefrey v. INS,

imcis, Usually the local rule requires you to file motion to reconsider within 10days after the opinion is issued. If i remember correctly, they do not count the weekends. Knowing that the judge issued his opinion on 11/30 you have already missed that deadline. However, since your judge was far...