Can citizenship be denied due to dual nationality and conscription?
Dear Forum,
after I filed a WoM and my AUSA filed the third continuance on my case, the FBI name check cleared and the DHS/USCIS sent me an email (!) that they would like to talk to me.
The adjudicating officer told me that...
Defendant's Third UUnopposed Motion for an Extension of Time To Respond
Dear Paz and other members,
in a recent email discussion with my AUSA who asked me for a third continuance in my WoM, my AUSA mentioned that the case just came back from USCIS HQ to be adjudicated by the field office. As...
Surprise, evidently this is not the 9th circuit
Hi Paz,
this is hilarious. While I was waiting for your answer an email from the AUSA popped up in my mail box.
"Dr. W:
Please note that I will be out of the office April 13-17, 2007. In that regard, if we will be filing an agreed...
Hi Paz,
I also talked to two lawyer friends who are not immigration experts. They told me to keep the case in the judicial system as long as possible.
So from what I gather my best option is
a. to ask for another 60 day continuance to provide the USCIS with the option to adjudicate, and if...
Wording of Joint Stipulation
Hi Paz,
I saw that snorlax was also looking for the wording by his AUSA. I was unable to locate it.
1. What is important to include at this point. I am going to write him tomorrow.
2. Given the fact that I leave May 15 and don't return until my teaching...
Urgent: Joint stipulation?
Hi Paz,
thank you for the info. Yes, I thought I had to be the prevailing party. So what is the smartest thing is to keep the AUSA in the picture as long as possible which means I should only agree to another 60 day extension and not discuss remanding the...
Dismissing the case with prejudice
Hello Paz and other forum members,
"my" very active AUSA wrote me today the following email:
Dear Dr. W:
I have been informed that your file was forwarded from Washington and has now been received by the Jacksonville Field Office. All that remains...
Extensions vs. Motion to Remand a Case
Paz and group friends,
In my case (WoM 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b)) the second extension is going to expire at the end of this week. After a follow up, I received an email message a message on 03/30/07 from my AUSA which reads
Dr. W.:
I communicated...
Responsibilities of HQ USCIS after Name Check
Dear Bushmaster,
thanks so so much. So if I understand this from your and other member;s input correctly after the name check is completed the file is sent to the HQ USCIS for review if
a, there is a lawsuit pending and/or
b. there is a...
Selection of Immigration Lawyer
Dear Manuel,
I went through the whole process including the pallication for citizenship. I can just reinforce how important it is to get a good immigration lawyer. I fired mine and did the stuff mysself. However, mine was an easy case.
Traditionally, the...
The end in sight?
Michael, Paz, and other experts:
Hi Paz and other gurus ,
I received a note form my AUSA today reading:
Dr. W:
I communicated with Mr. K. on March 28, 2007, and he advised that Headquarters has yet to forward the background check. If there had been issues raised...
Pending at USCIS Headquarters - are they slow?
Hi Paz and other gurus ,
I received a note form my AUSA today reading:
Dr. W:
I communicated with Mr. K. on March 28, 2007, and he advised that Headquarters has yet to forward the background check. If there had been issues raised...
Due Process
So does this mean that my negative hit - which will come up to to a DUI arrest (cleared later on)- will automatically send it to the USCIS headquarters in DC instead of straight to the field office?
Thanks so much?
Process after the Name Check has been completed?
Dear Snorlax and other members,
what I am wondering are future obstacles once the Name Check makes it out of the FBI administration. Is it normal that the USCIS in DC reviews the "background check" and then refers it to the District Office...
Dera Paz and other members,
after my name check made it out of the FBI I asked my AUSA for an update. this is the response:
I spoke with Mr. K. of USCIS in J. on Friday, and he has
advised that your background check was released by the FBI to the USCIS
Washington DC office for review...
U.S. Senators and the Name Check Process
This is interesting. My name check is completed and evidently on the way back to USCIS.
Nonetheles, I contacted my Senator several weeks ago and received the standard letter from his staff. However, what was interesting was an attachment by the...
Quick Court System
This is unbelievable. After having to deal with the evidentlly slower pace of the DHS and FBI I found this on the pacer this morning. The AUSA filed his unopposed motion on Friday, 02/16/07.
ORDER: Defendants' Second Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond...
Dear Paz,
I tried to look through the old postings. In my case with the judge who is in all likelihood going to grant the 60 day extension requested by the AUSA chances to recover the costs seem evidently pretty slim. The motion of the AUSA is already in the PACER.
Can I pro forma later on...
N-400/Name Check/ $$
Dear Paz and other helpful members,
after I talked to my AUSA and he told me that according to the litigation report the FBI has completed my name check which is now waiting to be sent in a batch (the results are not sent individually but the FBI evidently waits till...
Dear Paz:
I received the following email from my AUSA.
Greetings Dr. W.:
I have tried calling you today, but your answering machine is set to receive faxes and I have not been able to communicate with you or leave a message. Please call me back at
The FBI has advised that your name...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.