Search results

Hi there, i haven't been active on this forum for quite a while. For you who linger on this forum a lot you might have seen my posts. I was a dv15 selectee but got eliminated in the process due to my cn being too high due to some countries taking up most of the visas, i applied dv16 and didn't...

Fairness isn't at the top of kcc's priority list

KCC's interpretation of diversity sorely needs a fixing

long story short KCC just doesn't give a **** if the asian visas are mostly taken up by nepalese and iranians, to their eyes all asians are the same no matter which country they are from (which by the way could not be further from the truth) they just couldn't care less except going home...

Agreed 7650 is too far.. At least 9.xxx

Interview fees + medical checkup fees + elis fees + airplane ticket fees + bank account statement for the co All but bank account multiplied by 3..(me wife son)

so weird, then why did kcc stop asia at 7650 ? unless they clear out all those iranian ap cases there is no way they can meet the quota, Nepal is already limited. yes they should, they really should, but as a consequence they must lower the country limit (7%) otherwise there is risk of the visas...

they will clear you in no time trust me, otherwise they would have increased the sept vb for asia, but they didn't, to buy time to clear iranian ap cases

Well then congratulations your case is prioritized by KCC (nepal and Iran cases are so much more precious than other Asian cases in kcc's eyes) You will be fine, kcc will do everything they can to let you through, they didn't even increase the sept number in order for Iranian cases to pass If...

Too many Iranians and Nepalese taking up visas... About time they get disqualified (5-year 50k quota)

Its not about the issue of whether they give a s*** about what country they're from.. The name of the program is "Diversity Visa" and diversity means comprised of a mix of many things... The reality seems to suggest otherwise Otherwise, take the diversity part out of the programs name..

Your version is no different from what kcc is currently doing with the addition of "noting their case number and not allowing them to enter again next year" Me? Simple... Separate their vb from the beginning..reduce the country limit in order for the visa to not run out before the countries hit...

is this some kind of sarcasm or what ? bloody unbelieveable

Mr Britsimon let's suppose for a moment you're in control of the dv program, you can change the rules, anything.. What would your approach to these countries be? Or would you just sit by idly like kcc is doing now watching as iran and nepal play in the field while roa sit in the substitute...

it does raise into question if the draw process is really random when the early numbers are occupied by iran and nepal (80%), i believe there must be a better way to handle these two countries other than of course disqualifying them, it's more of a will thing...are they willing to fix this when...

yeah roa cases within those numbers have the same chance as nepal or iranian cases but what is the proportion of iran-nepal cases within those numbers to roa cases within the same numbers ? 8-2 iranian and nepalese entries have much higher chance of being put in the earlynumbers than roa cases...

SHE is just ANOTHER REASON for kcc to hold back ROA PROGRESS

Now the you're-safe-if-your-cn-is-below-10k thing is no longer valid... Also now that the waiting game is over, i might as well expose my cn in its entirity since there's no point in keeping it a secret, useless number anyways.. 13.623

If they can fill up the quota by only 7650 cases, who knows what may happen next year (especially given the recent iran-us nuclear deal), probably AS5000 ?? Might as well disqualify all asian countries except nepal and iran, as long as they can still meet the regional quota all is fine and...