Search results

My idea is to highlight the implicit injustice done to the old filers. i am extremely happy that people from August 2003 are getting green cards. In early 2002, the processing time was reduced to 9 months and by that token even August 2003 people deserve to get the green card. I don't think they...

GC022002, Thanks for coming forward. Please check your private message thanks,

Here are my details: My RD: 3/26/2002 ND: 4/10/2002 RFE replied : 10/23/2003 No second FP and no Approval notice.. I am not sure how many left before July 2002...it looks like very few and may be unfortunate people like me.... To me it looks like these people were going...

i just voted

Rajiv, Great effort !!! We have already won....I strongly believe that the recent spurt in adjudications is because of this law suit. I liked your fighting spirit. I will be in the court next time.

So, our assumption of invalidating AC 21 through indirect means is accurate. It is good news to learn the life of FP has no valid reason. Is there is any indication that USCIS will look into this. -rajum

Congratulations Buddy.. You earned it... :) Enjoy the life.... -rajum

I modified the original version produced by dsatish and here is my version... A sample PDF looks like this... -rajum To, xxx Congress member California xxx Dist Subject : Expressing our appreciation for your letter to USCIS to reduce the backlogs. Dear Sir, We want to...

I am veering towards two faxes. In the first fax, we send out "thanking you" and telling more about immigrationportal.org and in the second fax, we will will spill our views. -rajum

Thank you Rajiv for posting it. I read the whole transcipt. To me the judge seems to be favorable...

Congratulations... Kashmir, Hearty congratulations !!! You really deserve it.... -rajum

Technically you can stay till the INS approves H-1 cancellation petition by your current employer. You are eligible for the salary tilll that time... -rajum

Congratulations freenation.... I am happy for you & your family... It's so nice of you for volunteering to contribute... Hope to see to you sometime in train... -rajum

Rajiv has issued three corrections to the minutes of the conference call. The corrections are as follows: point no 5 is corrected and should be read as : 5) He explained what is Rule 16 statement. He said that we need to file Rule 16 statement. Basically, that statement explains to the...

I cannot comment further...I am not too sure on many aspects... However, I respect your opinion. -rajum

Re: Re: Re: Interesting fact about security checks... thanks Cinta I read it now in Murthy... Oh! my god..are they crazy..it't total paronoia on the part of USCIS...I am convinced...that they simply don't want to give green cards... so our files might have ran security checks 100 times...

Re: May I recommend this. If you request this, you are falling into the trap of USCIS...they already alleged that the plantiffs are requesting the court to order USCIS to adjudicate their cases first violating the queue... Second thing...if you put such a proposal and court accepts...

Re: Interesting fact about security checks... I think we need to ask USCIS whether this is true or not... If it is true, imagine the paronoia of USCIS...to me, it is like doing multiple post-mortems on dead bodies... -rajum

Re: Backlog injury to the US You got a good point... My personal opinion is that this is a political argument rather than argument about law. So, courts deal with law and they are not suppose to look into economic or political issues.... So, I perfectly agree with your opinion and we...

yes...it is in the Judge hands now...Rajiv has refused to give any time frames as he says that his guess is like anybody guess... -rajum