Search results

It won't let you see the doc except judge's order. But you can see if your lawyer had to re-submit summons.

That sounds similar to my case. My lawyer was also based in CA and I live in AZ. He had to resubmit the summons. 60 days got wasted in my case. You can see more details about your case if you sign up for pacer.gov. There is a fee for it of course.

Finally the long journey is over! I received my GC today in mail. Like CuriousGeorge once said: I am no longer curious, I AM APPROOOOOVED!! Here is the timeline of my GC journey (not my entire US journey back in the 90s or 2004-2014 timeframe): April 2014: My new employer immediately started...

3/31/17: WOM complaint filed by my lawyer. 4/18/17: Judge ordered: "ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be...

Got the magical text/email that the case was approved today!

Latest update: AUSA has told my lawyer that she's been told by USCIS that they're trying to make a decision on my I-485 by Aug 18th (when their response to court is due). And they transferred my case again according to case tracker on USCIS website. Probably to field office or back to Nebraska...

I recommend Murthy in Washington DC. They're pretty good at WOM. And they quoted me almost half what Fragomen got from me. I was forced to use Fragomen because my case is EB2 I-485 and my sponsor's HR didn't let me hire my own lawyer even though I had to pay out of pocket.

I just got a call from the WOM lawyer. AUSA is willing to file a stipulation with the court that the case will be adjudicated in 30 days. And if it isn't, we can re-open the lawsuit. The transfer is not to the field office for an interview. But whatever they want to do (interview etc), they...

They transferred my case. Most probably means they want to interview me. I am not happy with that because it is another delay tactic unless they act fast on it. I emailed the lawyer to oppose any motions by AUSA for an extension. If we have to go to court hearings, so be it! They've had 2 years...

RFE was for re-doing the medicals. I mailed it yesterday. I guess I am not getting an interview because they went straight to RFE for medicals.

Almost 2 years ago.

Looks like my GC case is finally moving after I filed a WOM lawsuit. After my lawyer had a chat with their lawyer (AUSA), I got an RFE for re-doing the medical exams. Will keep you posted. And after getting the GC, I will provide details about the timeline of my case and all the things and steps...

Update: I got an email notification for RFE. Probably for expired medical. Finally the case is moving! Looks like lawyer's chat with AUSA has been helpful. She does not want to pick a fight and hopefully it'll all get resolved soon.

I talked to the lawyer today. It was court clerk's recommendation to re-submit summons (more like an ultimatum). However, he called AUSA office and they seemed to have been sitting on it all this time. He said he told them we would go to hearings with or without them and if we got a judgement in...

I know he has submitted summons but why twice? Why is he re-submitting summons now that the 60 day is up? Where do we go from here? Does the 60 day clock get reset? If so, that sucks :( Unfortunately I had to use my sponsor/employer's attorney and these corporate lawyers are not very responsive...

There have been some new entries on Pacer for my WOM case. Does anyone on this thread have any clue what these mean? Did my lawyer screw up with serving the summons back in April and now he's re-doing it? X; me; Y: my lawyer 4/20: - SERVICE EXECUTED filed by X: Certificate of Service re...

Now here's the question running in my head: was my lawyer incompetent by not submitting a summons upon AUSA in the first place? Or is it not common to submit a summons upon AUSA, and you only submit summons upon the defendants (USCIS, DHS, FBI et al)?

Here's the difference between the last executed service and this one: the last one says complaint upon Gallman, Kelly et al, and this one says complaint upon AUSA.

Ok, here is what the lawyer did today according to Pacer. Before this, the last status was: 4/20/17: SUMMONS Submitted by X (that'd be me) And now these new items are added: 6/13/17: SERVICE EXECUTED filed by X (that'd be me): Certificate of Service re: Complaint upon AUSA on 5/31/17...

Ok, here's what my lawyer said: "I'll reach out today. Unfortunately, we can't ask for a "default judgment," we can ask the court to request the gvt answer and if they don't treat the nonresponse as waiving the right to and just decide the case on your pleadings."