Search results

Very good thinking. I believe only the last VB would be the one with calculations, percentages etc though and not this one. This VB should be more straightforward- as is. It'll come up today vs tomm.

Could you please consider erasing the post # 440? I could not do it on my side as there are no options for edit or delete. Thank you.

Sir: I had no intentions to upset or offend you in anyways. I respect the work that you have been doing and appreciate it. Please do not get into the feeling that I am in anyways underestimating you, your work or whatsoever. I have always found you manner friendly and joyful. Please apologize me...

Well. I am aware of that fact. That's why I mentioned him of the two probabilities that he and we have. It totally depends upon him. And sometimes people may get into the feeling that the things that they consider doing for others may not be within their interest area anymore and so I just...

Sleep at 9:45PM? In summer? Come on Simon. Please consider doing it today before you go to sleep if you trust something is different. Otherwise, we'll extract things from your last comment: Where are the predictions?

Anything new Brit?:(

No it won't be that low. Where did you get that impression from? I'd more more optimistic if I were. Pessimism does not add anything at this stage but unhappiness.

I understand what you are saying Simon. I have some questions though. So, between 42000 and 45006, there are 1113 cases. That roughly makes a little less than 400/1K . So how this density is any different than any range after the CN35700. I am thinking that they are all the same. You said 46000...

Good points bro. Keep up the good work. I never thought that language was even an issue on your side but actually mine. :(

From where did you get the impression that the gap between those numbers is very small Brit? We knew that the density was stable at 350-400/1K till the end. Also what did you mean by derivative growth? I guess, you meant the current mean derivative rate. Is that right?

I'd say. EU: 38-40K.

I do not get it. If Backlog is cleared, then it should all be the newer and actually the higher CNs. Why should it squeeze within 40K if all backlog is cleared? Should not it be more and more higher CN? Or is it again a language thing in btw us? :D

Agreed. But I guess you wanted to mean "there will be some backlog" and not (there will be no backlog). Right?

I might have underestimated the effect of AP cases if that's what it is. Other than that, I better see the effect of backlog cases in a specific month. There could be a small number of CNs announced current in the very last VB but there could potentially be a larger amount of ppl being...

I understand 2K will/may come from June interviews. But, how could 1575 CN produce almost under 2K though if we are calculating the AOS and AP separately?

That's right. Very good memory indeed. 39K- and first half. Thanks bro! Our fingers crossed. :cool:

Available visas left and corresponding CNs that I have provided are kind of educated guesses towards pointing the big picture. I might be wrong eventually. I do not think there will be any visas left unassigned for the EU region unless there are a huge number of no-shows, refusals etc. What I...

I re-read his note. Apparently, he is talking of a density increase w.r.t. DV-2014. He correlates at least some part of this increase to agents in U2 countries. Per your analysis, the RR in the U2 countries has decreased which should at least partially level off the increased density- if it...

Strong work n.n. How did you come up with the finding of density being increased for EU though? Is that because there are 1700 less forms being filed when compared to last year but still we are a bit behind of the May 2014 cut-off?

I am sorry. By late-comers I meant those with high confirmation numbers. It is my bad if this resulted in a language issue. Nevertheless, your points are solid but still, I am expecting a better case scenario for the EU despite your concern.