Search results

  1. S

    marriage to dependant less than 2 years

    No Title My lawyer said it is probable that if you were merried
  2. S

    Anyone with ND < 01/01/01 not approved? Please post here.

    No Title Hi,         That is the reason I created this thread.
  3. S

    Anyone with ND < 01/01/01 not approved? Please post here.

    No Title You can make an enquiry now. The easiest thing to do is to call IIO and check on status. The IIO may help you. If this doesn\'t help, proceed to do fax inquiries. This should defenitely help. But I guess you might have to wait for atleast one month before you can send a fax enquiry.
  4. S

    Anyone with ND < 01/01/01 not approved? Please post here.

    Please explain if there is a reason for delay. If not , you should be happy now, since you can make inquiries.
  5. S

    JIT Moved ahead

    No Title This means that if your ND
  6. S

    Internal transfer after 180 days.

    No Title AS long as the job description is the same, it should in no way affect your process
  7. S

    Approved 01-243-xxxxx

    No Title Congrats
  8. S

    ***Thread(s) SUMMARY updated (01/30/2001)

    No Title Pcee ,         Thanks for such a deatiled answer. The only reason I suggested this was , I(and maybe many others) realized you had to put in a lot of effort to maintain this. If you are fine with it, that\'s good...
  9. S

    ***Thread(s) SUMMARY updated (01/30/2001)

    No Title THANKS PCEE. Great job. Is it possible to automate data submission, so that people can addd and edit entries by themselves in your website? This will reduce your work load. Thanks
  10. S

    request to dee rod, pcee, venkatramu, ciba, other gurus, other analysts

    No Title My PD is 04/99. AVM says processing resumed on Jan 11. As of yesterday, case is not yet assigned.
  11. S

    request to dee rod, pcee, venkatramu, ciba, other gurus, other analysts

    No Title Most appprovals are for Oakland/Bay area because most of the people are from Bay area . You casn look at PCee\'s list to confirm this
  12. S

    Just talked To IIO

    No Title I think the only reliable info we can get is if the case is assigned to an officer or not. ( sometimes this also fails)
  13. S

    Just talked To IIO

    No Title FYI, for me, AVM says processing resumed on JaN 11TH. One IIO told me they received the reports on Jan 8th
  14. S

    Just talked To IIO

    No Title People were beleiving that process resumed message means case was assigned to an officer
  15. S

    Just talked To IIO

    No Title I had the same experience once. But only once.
  16. S

    Just talked To IIO

    No Title This is the first time I am hearing where AVM says processing resumed but CSC has not received the FBI reports. I think you should check again by calling IIO, b\'cos everyone beleives that AVM changes to process resumed only after CSC receives all agency reports. My two cents.
  17. S

    *** Thread(s) SUMMARY updated (01/28/2002)

    No Title Pcee Thanks for continuously posting updates. Also appreciate your effort to include latest. One suggestion : If you automate data submission, (so that the tables get updated automatically) ( Like ciba\'s) but maintain the same format, your workload will be significantly reduced...
  18. S

    Talked with IIO

    No Title Processing resumed doesnot mean it is assigned to officer. For me, AVM says processing resumed. I called IIO today. They said case is not yet assgned to officer.
  19. S

    Just spoke to IIO

    No Title Did you check if your case was assigned?
Top