Search results

It is definitely a result of Rajiv's lawsuit though all service centers should march consistently. They should all be working on November 2003 cases. Right now, only CSC is working on November 2003 applications.

Givemegreen, Do you know how to take a joke or do you become grumpy all the time? The following line was meant for humor "The focus is on getting GC fast for immigrants in California. It is the home state of a future president who happens to be an immigrant." No one is against improved...

GivemeGreen, The lawsuit has been filed for 485 delays in all service centers not just california. kashmir and other guys have been fighting for delays in all service centers not just california. please do not be that narrow minded or selfish to exult in the processing speeds in your...

The applicants from other service centers (VSC, TSC, NSC) want their applications to be approved with the same pace that the applications are being approved at CSC. That is their complaint. Is that too much to ask for in an un-fair world?

It is soooooo sloowwwwwwwwww.

The point is that other service centers should also speed up the processing like CSC? That was the entire purpose of this lawsuit. Why give benefit only to a select few?

Can it be pointed to the judges that Vermont, Texas and Nebraska are lagging by more than one year to California?

All the approvals are happening in California. California is processing 2004 cases already. How about other service centers?

The focus is on getting GC fast for immigrants in California. It is the home state of a future president who happens to be an immigrant. Does Vermont, Nebraska or Texas boast of such qualifications?

What does exhibit L (prima facie) mean?

njguy you are right, this needs to be stressed again and again that why are other service centers lagging so far behind compared to CSC? It is unrealistic and unacceptable.

In their quest to show some movement of dates, they have advanced the 485 dates in CSC to November 2003. Besides, they are also processing concurrent 485 filed in 2004 as part of pilot program. But the big question is what have they done to reduce the backlog in other centers? The dates in...

Rajiv, You might want to consider moving to NY/NJ and contesting for US senate. You have all our support. What do you say folks?

anyone wanna volunteer for the draft?

njguy that is a good idea, can someone draft a letter and then we can send it to ombudsman, senators and other officials highlighting the snail pace at VSC, NSC and TSC. When CSC can jump one year in one month, why cannt other three service centers?

That is a good idea, can someone draft an email or fax?

Dear Rajiv, Is it possible to point the VAST inconsistencies in processing of 485 at various service centers? It is extremely bizzare.

Exactly, the biggest issue is the inconsistencies in all steps of GC process. Since this hearing is for 485, doesn't it make sense to point the issue of inconsistencies in processing on 485 at various service centers? It is a big plus point for this lawsuit since the only thing in 485 is the...

perumpulli you are again just looking at your case which is probably filed using the pilot program. the processing date in california is nov 2003 while in other service centers it is still 2002. that is a big inconsistency not to take into account the pilot program cases that are getting...

Please don't take it personally. The comparison between 485 dates in different service centers was to point the inconsistencies among different service centers. It is not that only Californians have had to wait for LC, even the people from east coast like NY and NJ have had to wait for two to...