Search results

One more PM from him I got this PM. I tried to pursuade him, the best I can. I think action should be taken (Please send a warning mail, do NOT ban them yet) against following members, as their only motive is to post vulgar stuff and personal abuses. jiyojiyo - 65.238.28.100 (he is same...

You two don't know where to stop, do you? Why don't you two, put the other in your ignore list, so that you can't see the other's post? If you continue to post fighting with one another, I might have to delete all your posts, close this thread and report to 'Admin'.

I've deleted 2 of your posts and 4 of Joef's. You've deleted some of yours on your own, after JoeF responded. I don't want any fights here.

Thanks Rajiv

Obviously you can consider this as a future employment case and deal it like that.

I apologize for the big post , these are excerpts from 'Murthy's website'. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- The AC21 provisions statute speaks in terms of allowing a person with an application for adjustment of status, pending for 180 days or more, to...

Here is the exact concern on that thread (which has over 100 posts!), if you have some time. :) Law says that GC is for a future employment and once the GC is approved, he/she has to have the intent to work for the GC sponsoring employer. This intent might change after some time (say 6...

The concern is whether the new employer becomes the 'sponsoring employer' after the employee changes jobs under AC-21. 'Sponsor' is essentially an employer who is sponsoring GC for the employee.

INA: ACT 204 - PROCEDURE FOR GRANTING IMMIGRANT VISAS says this, (j) 3/ JOB FLEXIBILITY FOR LONG DELAYED APPLICANTS FOR ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS TO PERMANENT RESIDENCE- A petition under subsection (a)(1)(D)for an individual whose application for adjustment of status pursuant to section 245 has...

Which restriction? Both parties should have the 'intent' at the time of approval and the new employer should have the ability to pay. Don't put the words in my mouth, which I didn't say :) . Employ should have the 'intent' to work for the new employer at the time of approval, that didn't...

It is just the case of 'Ability to pay'.

INA: ACT 204 - PROCEDURE FOR GRANTING IMMIGRANT VISAS says this, (j) 3/ JOB FLEXIBILITY FOR LONG DELAYED APPLICANTS FOR ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS TO PERMANENT RESIDENCE- A petition under subsection (a)(1)(D)for an individual whose application for adjustment of status pursuant to section 245 has...

As long as you have full time employment with them, I don't see any problem.

Both of you, Stop this nonsense. If you guys don't agree with each other, just ignore the other person's post. Why are you keep on posting the same thing again and again?

Congrats, good luck.

He might have a problem if the company withdraws I-140.

Yes.

Thanks, I think the 'IP address' should be banned, otherwise, he might comeup with one more handle (He already has one more 'chigfu').

Yes, as long as you maintain your current permanent employment. But once you start working on EAD, you loose your H1 status.

Date of 485 approval, does not matter when the card is received.