Recent content by vasilich

Guys, let me explain my point. Unless we understand logic of the _law_ and it's intension, we cannot argue that we satisfy NIW with certainty. If the law says it should be bad for the country not to grant GC to an expert than what kind of arguments can prove it? So far I see only these: 1) GC...

I'm not talking about web design. I just want to understand why Brian couldn't work for the same company in H1 status. I don't see any reason that this could affect the nation in anyway whoever he is. 6 years is enough to go through the labor certification, which as far as I understand is...

But how would it "adversely affect" the nation if you would live in H1 status and go through labor certification? Do you want to say that it's enough just to prove that whatever outcome of the labor certification is, the nation would benefit if you state even though someone may loose his jobs...

Is there anything but security or defense? I guess with these kind of projects you won't have any problem in any country. I understand that working in a lab that requires clearance for some projcts like LLNL can be used as an argument, but what about other labs and universities?

Can you give an example of what in principle it could be? Almost anyone can wait for a while (6 years for H1 at least). So there are just few real advantages of GC vs H1: you can easily change your employer (hardly very important to the nation), your wife can work (so what, how can this affect...