planecrazy
New Member
This is my first post in the forum. Recently, I filed EB2 I-140/I-485 concurrently in June. On 08/24 my case status changed to RFE sent and we recieved the RFE on 08/30 for company's ability to pay. The officer states that 2006 fincancial records show a net income of $-18M and net assets of just $4000
Now here is the strange part. One my colleagues also filed EB2 I-140/I-485 on the same day in June and his I-140 was approved on 08/23. Another colleague also got his EB3 I-140 approval in June. This has really got me perplexed. How come my I-140 got a RFE and others were approved
I also have a PERM EB2 I-140 approved in 04/2006 (details in my sig). Another positive point is that my W-2 salary for 2006 is much more that the offered wage on Labor and I-140 ( and the whole salary is from the same company).
The lawyer feels that there was a mistake on USCIS officer's part in interpreting the 2006 financial records. The confusion could arise because our company was acquired in Feb 2006 and as a result the financial statements for 2006 had to be adjusted.
So, what is the best way to respond to the RFE. My lawyer is going to send updated financial statements till Q2 or Q3 2007 along with my W2s for 2004, 2005 and 2006. In addition I feel that a letter from our CFO clarifying 2006 statements might also help.
What else can we add to the response?
Thanks in advance for the replies.
Now here is the strange part. One my colleagues also filed EB2 I-140/I-485 on the same day in June and his I-140 was approved on 08/23. Another colleague also got his EB3 I-140 approval in June. This has really got me perplexed. How come my I-140 got a RFE and others were approved
I also have a PERM EB2 I-140 approved in 04/2006 (details in my sig). Another positive point is that my W-2 salary for 2006 is much more that the offered wage on Labor and I-140 ( and the whole salary is from the same company).
The lawyer feels that there was a mistake on USCIS officer's part in interpreting the 2006 financial records. The confusion could arise because our company was acquired in Feb 2006 and as a result the financial statements for 2006 had to be adjusted.
So, what is the best way to respond to the RFE. My lawyer is going to send updated financial statements till Q2 or Q3 2007 along with my W2s for 2004, 2005 and 2006. In addition I feel that a letter from our CFO clarifying 2006 statements might also help.
What else can we add to the response?
Thanks in advance for the replies.