I’m with mom on this one. The constitutional amendment supporting this was made for a noble reason (to ensure citizenship for the children of slaves) but it’s being widely abused these days.
However jbuff you may want to note it’s not just about children of illegals but many non-citizens, including tourists and other visa holders (work, study etc). I haven’t seen enough detail to understand if he means to exclude the children of green card holders too, though one of the news stories mentioned this group has been protected by legal decisions before. There has apparently not been any attempted action taken in the past against the children of birth tourists.