No Title
Found this in EZBoard:
http://pub35.ezboard.com/fisnforumsi1485forum.showMessage?topicID=9554.topic
Here\'s the text
Found this at rediff.com
A few years ago Ajay Sehgal (not his real name), a young Indian high tech
worker based in Connecticut, received a letter from the Social Security
Administration.
The letter stated that through the six years that Sehgal lived and worked in the
United States -- first on an H-1B visa and later while his greencard application
was pending -- he had contributed approximately $50,000 in social security
taxes.
Since he was unsure of whether his greencard petition would be approved, Sehgal thought he could cash in the $50,000 and return to India. So he approached his
local social security office.
"It is my money after all," Sehgal said recently. "If they will not allow me to live in this country, if I cannot retire in this country, then they should allow me to take
my money and return to India. Right?"
Wrong, said the local social security office. He was told that foreign employees (including those on H-1B visas) who may have worked in the America for a few
years could claim social security benefits upon retirement, but this depends on the country of their origin.
In fact, Sethi later learned, as an Indian citizen on a temporary visa such as H-1B, he could not receive any social security retirement benefits -- even though he
had legally paid his social security taxes.
"An Indian national on an H-1B visa is here for a period of six years," said Herb Loring, a social
insurance program specialist with the SSA office in New York City. "And this person would get
nothing. That is the law."
"But if this person came back and worked for four more years, under whatever status, and fulfilled
the \'40-quarters\' exception rule, then this person could receive social security retirement benefits,"
Loring added. "Basically they cannot collect their money if they are an Indian national, unless they
meet the exception."
The \'40-quarter\' exception rule, Loring explained, means that this person should have worked in the
United States for at least 10 years. He added that this exception rule applies to citizens of over 30
countries who may have been employed in America for part of their career. The list of countries
includes India, China, Afghanistan, Thailand, Kenya, Tunisia and Bangladesh, he said.
Loring added that workers from several Western European countries and Canada can claim social
security benefits even if they worked in the United States for less than 10 years. The reason he said
is the United States has treaties of reciprocity with these countries.
"The reciprocity rule in the treaties means that if a US citizen went to this other country and worked
there for a few years under that country\'s retirement system, then the US citizen could also collect
retirement benefits from that country," Loring said.
In addition, the United States also has \'totalization agreements\' with some countries, such as the
United Kingdom, under which US nationals can receive retirement benefits based on their combined
work history at home and in the other country.
But America has not signed any such treaty with India, Loring said. He suggested that the reason
could be that India does not have a national retirement system similar to the United States and many
other Western nations.
"I cannot comment on the question of fairness or unfairness," Loring said. "This is law in the United
States."
But for workers like Ajay Sehgal the laws reek of discrimination, especially since the largest
contingent of H-1B visa workers in the United States are from India and China.
"I call this daylight robbery," Sehgal fumed. "This rule has to be changed."
"Giving us a greencard or not giving us a greencard is your right. I fully appreciate it. But why do you rob us of our social security? If you are a fair country, either
give us the greencard or refund the social security."
