fimbria said:if we get i-140 approved this june2006,how long we may have to wait for ead,i mean for dates to become current under eb-2 for indians.optimisticly and pessimisticly?2-8yrs?any one?or yrs toyrs
srini88 said:I dont completely agree with that calculation, Also the fact that it has moved 1 yr in 2months does show that it has progressed, I am not saying that it will continue at the same rate but atleast it has progressed. Werent there a lot of H1B applying back then too but still the dates did move...or am I totally missing something here
fimbria said:if we get i-140 approved this june2006,how long we may have to wait for ead,i mean for dates to become current under eb-2 for indians.optimisticly and pessimisticly?2-8yrs?any one?or yrs toyrs
newbies said:Remember there are not many people with PD of 1998-2001 left in the queue (many of them got GC already). So, you could expect the PD move fast up to 2001.
After 2001, around 2003-2005, alot of big companies start profitable. They start to file GC. My company files over 1K LC during that period (the wait time for people to get their LC file is 8-10 months since submiting all paper works, even they hired 3 big law firms to take care visa people)
All H1B get into the country during the years 2001, 2002, 2003 , 2004 should already have their GC filed (LC stage or I140 or I485 stage).
Total H1B visa = 195*3 + 65 = 650K.
Assume 1/3 of them are indian (I am sure more than 1/3).
650K/3 = 216K
Assume 2 people per family (I am sure most family has more than 2 people
GC needs 216K*2 = 432K
Let see how many GC per year allocated to Indian : 140K & 7% = 10K.
Just see the number of how many years. I did not count people who get H1B in 2005.
Of course, you can hope that PD move 6 months every month and get GC in 3 years (Hope all other H1B left the country so you can get GC).
Either way, just wait then. There is no limited for H1B extension. Many people I know in their 9 years of H1B, but none of them leave the country yet since they could not get 120+K/year from home
fimbria said:eb-3 is understood,coz lot of people qualify for it and they apply.but eb-2 also you all say it might take 10yrs-15 yrs,then if thats the case why would any one want to come to this country?if we are here just for good salaries,there are other european countries as well.anyways did such retrogression happen in the past?
fimbria said:how can you be so sure?do you think there will be some changes regarding these visa retrogression issues in the senate?
are you being too optimistic?