Search results

  1. S

    Will this fly

    If anyone thinks things are moving in DOL Land, read this The Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) was developed to assess and improve program performance so that the Federal government can achieve better results. A PART review helps identify a program’s strengths and weaknesses to inform...
  2. S

    S. 1932 Status

    Thanks. I agree that this is a point that many are uneasy about but think about these Firstly, does it make sense to anyone that we take zazona as our point of legal reference? Secondly, we would not be wasting time and not to mention money if we had not weighed in these options. Thirdly...
  3. S

    Meeting in Washington D.C. - Jan 14th and 15th

    At the outset, I would like to thank the other participants for spending so much of their personal time and money in this effort in making a channelized approach to our lawmakers. The participants - WaldenPond, SunJoshi, StuckLabor, Sandeep_N, LogicLife, GCBronco, BlackLogs, Vingivi- flew in...
  4. S

    S. 1932 Status

    Meeting in Washington D.C. - Jan 14th and 15th At the outset, I would like to thank the other participants for spending so much of their personal time and money in this effort in making a channelized approach to our lawmakers. The participants - WaldenPond, SunJoshi, StuckLabor, Sandeep_N...
  5. S

    S. 1932 Status

    Techy, I believe I replied to your questions here http://boards.immigrationportal.com/showpost.php?p=1328378&postcount=6 If you want step by step instructions and if anybody here is able to provide this, then we do not have any use of a lobbyist :) Seriously speaking, while questions are...
  6. S

    Lobbying, fund-raising and Conference calls for Retrogression Relief

    I am involved in the immigrationvoice effort currently - I strongly believe that we need a professional direction. And as usual all the help is welcome.
  7. S

    Lobbying, fund-raising and Conference calls for Retrogression Relief

    Just to give you an idea of the funds required, it is just sufficient to see the funds which anti immigration groups are spending. http://www.publicintegrity.com/lobby/profile.aspx?act=clients&year=2003&cl=L010033 indicates the amount that FAIR spent - a whopping 260k in 2004 when things were...
  8. S

    S. 1932 Status

    WHY WE "LOST" I believe we "lost" because the argument was that all immigration reforms would be addressed in a comprehensive manner next year. The flaw with that argument is that comprehensive immigration is mired in controversy over illegal immigration. To make us stand in line while they...
  9. S

    S. 1932 Status

    Have sent you a mail in your yahoo I.D. with an attachment showing authors/sections etc. Please check
  10. S

    S. 1932 Status

    The document indicates that the visa fees were excluded. All the H1, L1 and EB visa provisions were included in that. So that means that these provisions have not been included.
  11. S

    S. 1932 Status

    What exactly is the ambiguity? http://www.house.gov/budget/summarys1932.pdf Page 3 Judiciary Related Provisions: Included: Bankruptcy and civil case filing fee increases for $553 million in savings. Not Included: Ninth Circuit realignment and visa fees.
  12. S

    S. 1932 Status

    Conference Report Agreed to Conference Report Agreed to in the House
  13. S

    S. 1932 Status

    Judiciary Related Provisions: Included: Bankruptcy and civil case filing fee increases for $553 million in savings. Not Included: Ninth Circuit realignment and visa fees. Judiciary plans to make up 553 million from Bankruptcy and civil case filing fee..? None of the CBO estimates show...
  14. S

    S. 1932 Status

    http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/18/congress.roundup.ap/ House Republican leaders said they would call for a vote within hours, and a post-midnight session seemed likely. Passage would clear the way for a Senate vote as early as Monday.
  15. S

    S. 1932 Status

    Update on C-Span2 It looks like ANWR is holding things up. Looks like some compromise was reached an hour ago- if I heard it right. But some Democrats are threatening fillibuster - which would mean this would be a long night
  16. S

    People viewing thie S 1932 Status Thread...PLEASE SIGN UP HERE.

    My Details 1) Display Name: Sandeep_N 2) Email address (optional): sand_n@hotmail.com 3) Area staying in : KS
  17. S

    S. 1932 Status

    Noone is picking it up at the Senate Judiciary (202) 224-5225
  18. S

    S. 1932 Status

    I would think that she thinks we are organized group is kind of like a compliment :) and that the calls are having an effect atleast in showing that there are lot of guys in this position
  19. S

    S. 1932 Status

    Dont think that there is anything wrong if people call them - just goes on to show them the extent of the problem. Though it would be good if people affected by retrogression from all communities can participate and she can hear quite a few accents!
  20. S

    S. 1932 Status

    Option for sending separate message to Lamar Smith Option for sending separate message to Lamar Smith has been included in ISNAmerica's website It is there in the Individual Fax and is the 1st option
Top